공정성 확보를 위한 소수파주주 보호제도
Protection of Minority Shareholders against Unfair Prejudice
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Stock of the close corporation is typically owned by a small number of shareholders. The directors and shareholders may in some cases be the same individuals. By the way, the majority shareholders dominate the management of close company. The doctrine of majority rule creates the possibility for majority shareholders to make decisions which further their own interests at the expense of the minority owners. Moreover, the majority shareholders often oppress the minority with the unfair prejudice. Therefore, The UK Company Law has developed to 'oppression and remedy of minority shareholders. The doctrine of shareholder oppression attempts to safeguard the close corporation minority investor from the improper exercise of majority control. First, this thesis examines how protect minority shareholders against oppression or unfair prejudice on a comparative analysis of the United Kingdom, United State America, German and Japan . A review of remedies for shareholder disputes in the UK, USA, German and Japan reveals considerable diversity in company law. The UK and USA has adopted the measures for the relief, that is, court's ordering one or more members to purchase the shares of other members. German has the expulsion remedy. But we have not the relief statutory for minority shareholders oppressed in the company's affairs such as the UK, USA, German. Conclusionally, I think, it is necessary to adopt the Uk way of remedy. And it is necessary to adopt unconditional appraisal remedy under the particulars matters.
Abstract
The Stock of the close corporation is typically owned by a small number of shareholders. The directors and shareholders may in some cases be the same individuals. By the way, the majority shareholders dominate the management of close company. The doctrine of majority rule creates the possibility for majority shareholders to make decisions which further their own interests at the expense of the minority owners. Moreover, the majority shareholders often oppress the minority with the unfair prejudice. Therefore, The UK Company Law has developed to 'oppression and remedy of minority shareholders. The doctrine of shareholder oppression attempts to safeguard the close corporation minority investor from the improper exercise of majority control. First, this thesis examines how protect minority shareholders against oppression or unfair prejudice on a comparative analysis of the United Kingdom, United State America, German and Japan . A review of remedies for shareholder disputes in the UK, USA, German and Japan reveals considerable diversity in company law. The UK and USA has adopted the measures for the relief, that is, court's ordering one or more members to purchase the shares of other members. German has the expulsion remedy. But we have not the relief statutory for minority shareholders oppressed in the company's affairs such as the UK, USA, German. Conclusionally, I think, it is necessary to adopt the Uk way of remedy. And it is necessary to adopt unconditional appraisal remedy under the particulars matters.
참고문헌 (30)
- 정동윤, "閉鎖會社의 法理" (1982), 법문사
- 안동섭, "소수파주주의 주식매수청구권 in 상사법학에의 초대, 無碍 徐燉珏 博士 八秩頌壽紀念論叢" (2000), 법문사
- 김성배, "다수파주주의 억압행위와 소수파주주의 합리적 기대", 기업법연구, 10(9) (2002), 한국기업법학회
- 양동석, "미국회사법상 소수파주주의 보호", 기업법연구, 3 (1998), 한국기업법학회
- 김재형, "폐쇄회사에 있어서의 소수파주주의 보호", 기업법연구, 9 (2002), 한국기업법학회
- 허덕회, "미국회사법에 있어서 주주간의 이해조정", 상사법연구, 20(4) (2002), 한국상사법학회
- 육태우, "소수파주주의 합리적 기대의 보호", 상사판례연구, 19(4) (2006), 한국상사판례학회
- 北澤正啓, "少數波株主保護の一方法 in 現代企業法の理論と課題" (2002), 信山社
- 川島 いづみ, "少數派株主に對する不公正な侵害行爲等の救濟制度(一)", 民商法雜誌, 98(5) (1988)
- 川島 いづみ, "アメリカ會社法における少數派株主保護の擴大 in 現代英美會社法の諸相" (1996), 成文堂
- 大野正道, "非公開會社の法理" (2007), システムファイブ
- 大野正道, "少數派株主の救濟制度と會社法改正試案について", 判例タイムズ, (640) (1987)
- 浜田道代, "株式·持分の買取請求權", 商事法務, (1093) (1961)
- 浜田道代, "株主の無條件株式買取請求權(一)", 商事法務, (982) (1958)
- 浜田道代, "閉鎖會社における投下資本の回收と閉鎖性の維持", 商事法務, (983) (1958)
- 法務省民事局參事官室, "大小會社區分立法等の問題點-各界意見の分析", 別冊商事法務, (77) (1985)
- こいけ 由美, "株式買取請求權の現代的意義と少數波株主の保護(二)", 法學論叢, 143(2) (1998), 京都大學法學會
- 野村修也, "閉鎖的資本會社における除名制度の必要性について", 西南學院大學 法學論集, 28(1) (1995)
- 川島 いづみ, "少數派株主の保護と株主間の利害調整", 私法, (59) (1997), 日本私法學會, 有斐閣
- ?神田秀樹, "資本多數決と株主間 の利害調整(五ㆍㆍ完)", 法學協會雜誌, 99(2) (1982), 有斐閣
- 山本 眞知子, "フランス會社法における少數派株主ㆍ社員の權利濫用槪念の生成 in 商法の歷史と論理-創澤康一郞 先生 古稀記念" (2005), 新靑出版
- John. H. Matheson, "A Aimple Statutory Solution to Minority Oppression in the Closely Held Business", Mine. L. Rev, 91, pp.660~ (2007)
- Sandra K. Miller, "Minority Shareholder Oppression in the Private Company in the European Community: A comparative Analysis of the German, United Kingdom, and French 'Close Corporation Problem'", Cornell In. L. J, 30, pp.383~ (1997)
- Douglas K. Moll, "Shareholder Oppression and 'fair value': Of Discounts, Dates, and Dastardly deeds in the Close corporation", Duke L. Jour, 154, pp.305~307 (2004)
- Brain R. Cheffins, "Company Law : Theory, Structure, and Operation" (1997), Clarendon
- Derek, French, "Company Law 2007-2008" (2007), OXFORD
- Douglas K. Moll, "Shareholder Oppression and 'fair value': Of Discounts, Dates, and Dastardly deeds in the Close corporation", Duke Law Journal, 54, pp.310~ (2004)
- Hetherington, "Illiquidity and Exploitation : A Proposed Statutory Solution to the Remaining Close Corporation Problems", Va. L. Rev, 63, pp.1~52 (1977)
- Franklin A. Gevurtz, "Corporation Law" (2000), West Group
- O'Neal, "Resolving Disputes in Closely Held Corporations : Intra-Institutional Arbitration", Harv. L. Rev, 67, pp.786~793 (1954)