직접목적어로부터의 하위추출과 타동사
Subextraction from Direct Object and Transitive Verbs
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper focuses on grammaticality distinction in Spanish examples of subextraction from direct object. In Spanish, it has been analyzed that it is possible to extract wh-phrases out of base-generated object noun phrases. However, subextraction is not possible from direct object of some Spanish verbs such as golpear, ayudar, acusar, etc. I discuss that these verbs are analyzed as pseudo-transitive verbs which have a different derivation structure from transitive verbs and these two types of verbs have different syntactic properties. Concretely, the spell-out of pseudo-transitive verb involves a conflation operation of a nominal argument-that is, a cognate noun-into abstract verb. I argue that the derivation of pseudo-transitive verbs is naturally explained under the derivational structure proposed by Chomsky(2015) in which assumes the substantive elements of the lexicon. Following Chomsky(2013, 2015), the direct object of pseudo-transitive verb is generated in Spec-R and pseudo-transitive verb assigns a thematic role “GOAL” to direct object. Furthermore, I propose that subextraction from this position is not allowed based on the concept of phase cancellation.
Abstract
This paper focuses on grammaticality distinction in Spanish examples of subextraction from direct object. In Spanish, it has been analyzed that it is possible to extract wh-phrases out of base-generated object noun phrases. However, subextraction is not possible from direct object of some Spanish verbs such as golpear, ayudar, acusar, etc. I discuss that these verbs are analyzed as pseudo-transitive verbs which have a different derivation structure from transitive verbs and these two types of verbs have different syntactic properties. Concretely, the spell-out of pseudo-transitive verb involves a conflation operation of a nominal argument-that is, a cognate noun-into abstract verb. I argue that the derivation of pseudo-transitive verbs is naturally explained under the derivational structure proposed by Chomsky(2015) in which assumes the substantive elements of the lexicon. Following Chomsky(2013, 2015), the direct object of pseudo-transitive verb is generated in Spec-R and pseudo-transitive verb assigns a thematic role “GOAL” to direct object. Furthermore, I propose that subextraction from this position is not allowed based on the concept of phase cancellation.
참고문헌 (26)
- Bosque, I., "Fundamentos de Sintaxis Formal" (2009), Akal
- Bosque, I., "Reconsidering Subextraction: Evidence from Spanish", Borealis, 3, pp.223~258 (2014)
- Cano Aguilar, R., "Estructuras Sintácticas Transitivas en el Español Actual" (1981), Gredos
- Chomsky, N., "A festschrift for Morris Halle", pp.232~286 (1973), Holt, Rinehart & Winston
- Chomsky, N., "Barriers" (1986), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory", pp.133~166 (2008), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Problems of projection", Lingua, 130, pp.33~49 (2013)
- Chomsky, N., "Structures, Strategies and Beyond", pp.3~16 (2015), John Benjamins
- Demonte, V., "Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, Vol. 2", pp.2461~2523 (1999), Espasa
- Epstein, S., "Phase cancellation by external pair-merge of heads", Linguistic Review, 33, pp.87~102 (2016)
- Fábregas, A., "Differential Object Marking in Spanish: state of the art", Borealis, 2, pp.1~80 (2013)
- "Some notes on argument structure in Spanish and English" (2007)[URL]
- Fernández-Alcalde, H., "Boundaries, Phases and Interfaces", pp.306~324 (2017), John Benjamins
- Gallego, Á., "Phase Theory and Parametric Variation", 박사, pp.2007
- Gallego, Á., "Coreference, Modality, and Focus: Studies on the syntax semantics interface", pp.45~70 (2007), John Benjamins
- Hale, K., "Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure" (2002), MIT Press
- Harley, H., "Possession and the double object construction", Yearbook of Linguistic Variation, 2, pp.29~68 (2002)
- Huang, C. T. J., "Logical relation in Chinese and the theory of grammar", 박사, pp.1982
- Jiménez-Fernández, Á., "Extraction from dative and accusative DPs in psych verbs: a multifactorial approach", Paper delivered at II GETEGRA International Workshop: Nominals, pp.1~12 (2016)
- Jiménez-Fernández, Á., "Subextraction through doubled datives and beyond", Paper delivered at the International workshop: Dative structures and beyond (2017)
- Pensado, C., "El Complemento Directo Preposicional" (1995), Visor
- Pineda, A., "Double object constructions and dative", accusative alternations in Spanish and Catalan: A unified account, 2012, pp.2, 57~115
- Pylkkäanen, L., "Introducing arguments", 박사, pp.2002
- ", Corpus de referencia del español actual"[URL]
- Torrego, E., "The Dependencies of Objects" (1998), MIT Press
- Torrego, E., "Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, Vol. 2", pp.1779~1805 (1999), Espasa