신화 다시 쓰기: 李銳의 『人間』, 葉兆言의 『后羿』, 蘇童의 『碧奴』, 阿來의 『格薩爾王』의 ‘반영웅주의’ 비교를 중심으로
The Myths: focusing on the comparison of 'Anti-heroism' in <The Myth of Lady White Snake> by Li-Rui, <The Myth of HouYi and ChangE> by Ye-Zhaoyan, <The Myth of Meng Jiang Nu> by Su-Tong and <The Song of King Gesar> by A-Lai
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The objects of analyses in this paper, <The Myth of Lady White Snake> by Li-Rui, <The Myth of HouYi and ChangE> by Ye-Zhaoyan, <The Myth of Meng Jiang Nu> by Su-Tong, and <The Song of King Gesar> by A-Lai are the re-written novels in which the subjects of myths and sagas are re-told in much more abundance, and the metaphors, symbols, mystics, and fantasies naturally accumulated in the mind of the chinese for the long history were met with the authors' distinctive imaginations. These works are in common that they inherited the motive of 'Brother-Sister Got Married in Flood Myth' in terms of acceptance of the handed-down stories, and directed themselves to literary variations through the anti-heroic narrative strategy in terms of 're-writing'. One of the reasons of mystical beings birth is that in an absurd society where power has dominance and violation is rampant, people desire heroes who would make them escape from the pains and threats in reality. The primitive desires brought births of the mythical beings like White Snake, Yi, Meng Jiang Nu, or Gesar. They are the pre-cursors of the main characters of the four works. The four works went along the narrative structure with the flood(water)-survival of the siblings(man and woman with forbidden lusts) - test(crises and trials) - success(marriage and great achievement) - conclusion(catastrophe/harmonization), and the plots and the mythical beings were newly tranformed(re-written). The heroes of the stories re-written by the four authors were all the 'true human-being', who tried to approach to people but were excluded by the people, being ended in poor mythical-legendary beings. They were the lone beings who possessed the destiny and necessity and were supposed to be sacrificed for people. They revealed their characteristic deficits such as simplicity and immatureness such as being fallen to blind lusts. Meanwhile, they were all altruistic philanthropists, optimists without desire for power, and liberalists practicing love. The four authors throw the question of 'who are the real human-beings?', by revealing the 'anti-heroism' of the mythical beings in a paradoxical way. Lady White Snake, HouYi, BiNu, and Gesar, re-created by the four authors, were futuristic true human-beings with open minds who wanted to practice love and make society of co-existences. They wanted to live as human-beings in the world of human-beings. Nevertheless, the violence and exclusiveness of the majority not to accept different and other species caused the characters' tragic ends.
Abstract
The objects of analyses in this paper, <The Myth of Lady White Snake> by Li-Rui, <The Myth of HouYi and ChangE> by Ye-Zhaoyan, <The Myth of Meng Jiang Nu> by Su-Tong, and <The Song of King Gesar> by A-Lai are the re-written novels in which the subjects of myths and sagas are re-told in much more abundance, and the metaphors, symbols, mystics, and fantasies naturally accumulated in the mind of the chinese for the long history were met with the authors' distinctive imaginations. These works are in common that they inherited the motive of 'Brother-Sister Got Married in Flood Myth' in terms of acceptance of the handed-down stories, and directed themselves to literary variations through the anti-heroic narrative strategy in terms of 're-writing'. One of the reasons of mystical beings birth is that in an absurd society where power has dominance and violation is rampant, people desire heroes who would make them escape from the pains and threats in reality. The primitive desires brought births of the mythical beings like White Snake, Yi, Meng Jiang Nu, or Gesar. They are the pre-cursors of the main characters of the four works. The four works went along the narrative structure with the flood(water)-survival of the siblings(man and woman with forbidden lusts) - test(crises and trials) - success(marriage and great achievement) - conclusion(catastrophe/harmonization), and the plots and the mythical beings were newly tranformed(re-written). The heroes of the stories re-written by the four authors were all the 'true human-being', who tried to approach to people but were excluded by the people, being ended in poor mythical-legendary beings. They were the lone beings who possessed the destiny and necessity and were supposed to be sacrificed for people. They revealed their characteristic deficits such as simplicity and immatureness such as being fallen to blind lusts. Meanwhile, they were all altruistic philanthropists, optimists without desire for power, and liberalists practicing love. The four authors throw the question of 'who are the real human-beings?', by revealing the 'anti-heroism' of the mythical beings in a paradoxical way. Lady White Snake, HouYi, BiNu, and Gesar, re-created by the four authors, were futuristic true human-beings with open minds who wanted to practice love and make society of co-existences. They wanted to live as human-beings in the world of human-beings. Nevertheless, the violence and exclusiveness of the majority not to accept different and other species caused the characters' tragic ends.
참고문헌 (49)
- 김희영, "중국고대신화" (2001), 육문사
- 나다니엘 앨트먼, "물의 신화" (2003), 해바라기
- 魯迅, "아Q정전" (2003), 선학사
- 劉安, "淮南子" (2013), 명문당
- 르네 지라르, "희생양" (2007), 민음사
- 李銳, "사람의 세상에서 죽다" (2010), 詩作
- 朴一峰, "山海經" (1995), 육문사
- 박정혜, "신화의 세계" (2000), 성신여자대학교출판부
- 성각 스님, "백사전" (1996), 답게
- 蘇童, "눈물" (2007), 문학동네
- 孫郁, "루쉰과 저우쭤런" (2005), 소명
- 아침나무, "세계의 전설: 동양편" (2009), 삼양미디어
- 葉兆言, "후예" (2014), 문학동네
- 요시다 아츠히코, "세계의 신화 전설" (2010), 혜원출판사
- 袁珂, "중국신화전설" (2005), 민음사
- 유원수, "몽골 대서사시: 게세르 칸" (2007), 사계절
- 장기근, "중국의 신화――천지개벽과 삼황오제" (1999), 범우사
- 장기근, "중국의 신화·후편" (1999), 범우사
- 장지영, "나르시스의 연못" (2008), 이화여자대학교출판부
- 전인초, "민족혼으로 살다" (1999), 학고재
- 정재서, "사라진 신들과의 교신을 위하여" (2010), 문학동네
- 홍석표, "중국현대문학사" (2009), 이화여자대학교출판사
- 배도임, "李銳 小說 硏究", 박사, 중어중문학과 중국문학전공, pp.2012
- 鄭燦學, "중국 홍수남매혼 신화 연구", 석사, 중어중문학, pp.1997
- 권광호, "『老子』와 中國神話에 나타난 물의 상징성", 순천향 인문과학논총, 31(3), pp.197~219 (2012), 인문과학연구소
- 徐裕源, "중국 太陽起源神話와 多日神話의 연구", 人文論叢, 5 (1996)
- 徐裕源, "中國 洪水神話에 보이는 同胞配偶型 神話 硏究", 중어중문학, 21 (1997)
- 徐裕源, "중국의 주요 홍수신화의 연구", 중국어문논역총간, 11, pp.1~27 (2003), 중국어문논역학회
- 서유원, "중국 홍수신화와 인류기원신화에 보이는 호로와 중국민족의 호로숭배", 아시아문화연구, 17, pp.285~306 (2009), 아시아문화연구소
- 서유원, "중국 주요 시조신화에 보이는 태양숭배와 태양 감응신화의 연구", 아시아문화연구, 28, pp.93~119 (2012), 아시아문화연구소
- 전영숙, "한국과 중국의 창세 및 건국신화 속에 깃든 물 숭배 관념", 한중인문학연구, (24), pp.247~274 (2008), 한중인문학회
- 정재서, "금지된 욕망과 물의 서사-홍수신화·소나기·비(rain)", 문학동네, 8(3)통권 : 28 (2001)
- 정재서, "주목왕(周穆王)이 서쪽으로 간 까닭은?", 문학동네, 9(3)통권 : 32 (2002)
- 정재서, "食人ㆍ狂氣ㆍ近代 ― 狂人日記에 대한 신화적 독법, 兼論 황제를 위하여", 중국현대문학, (35), pp.81~110 (2005), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 박소영, "“눈엣가시 걸리기만 해” … 색안경 낀 검열의 눈", 한국일보, ~ (2014)
- 신효령, "신경숙 표절 파문 '후폭풍'…문학·출판계, 대책 마련 부심", 뉴시스, ~ (2015)
- 양성진, "Canongate Books' ‘The Myths’ series greet Korean readers", The Korea Herald, ~ (2005)
- 阿來, "格薩爾王" (2014), 重慶出版社
- 丹珍草, "藏族當代作家漢語創作論" (2008), 民族出版社
- 顧希佳, "孟姜女哭長城" (2006), 廣東敎育出版社
- 李銳, "人間" (2007), 重慶出版社
- 魯迅, "魯迅小說全集" (2005), 長江文藝出版社
- 蘇童, "碧奴" (2006), 重慶出版社
- 孫琦, "白娘子傳說" (2008), 中國社會出版社
- 田漢, "白蛇傳" (1955), 作家出版社
- 葉兆言, "后羿" (2011), 長江文藝出版社
- 張恨水, "白蛇傳" (1990), 莊嚴出版社
- 王宏印, "集體記憶的千年傳唱--藏蒙史詩格薩爾的飜譯與傳播硏究", 中國飜譯, (2) (2011)
- 王治國, "民族誌視野中的 格薩爾 史詩英譯硏究", 西北民族大學學報(哲學社會科學版): 中文核心期刊, (5) (2010)
