인도의 도심 보행친화성에 관한 리빙랩 모델 연구
A Study on the Urban Living Lab Model connected with Walkability of Cities in India
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
혁신 프로세스는 기후 변화, 고령화 도시, 보건 및 이동성 문제와 같은 전 세계적으로 존재하는 사회적 과제를 해결하는 데 핵심적 요소이다. 이러한 측면에서 도시의 역할과 어반 콘텍스트는 매우 중요하다. 어반 리빙랩은 다중 이해관계자와의 협업을 통해 현대 도시가 직면한 문제를 해결할 수 있는 방법론이다. 본 연구에서는 남아시아의 중추 국가인 인도의 도심 보행친화성 향상을 주제로 벵갈루루의 의 말레스와람 어반 리빙랩과 고아의 파나지 어반 리빙랩 사례를 분석한다. 첫째, 사례 랩을 분석 방법론인 혁신 개발 프로세스에 따라 설명한다. 둘째, 유럽리빙랩네트워크(European Network of Living Labs, ENoLL)의 평가 기준 20개를 확장된 비즈니스 모델 캔버스(Extended Business Model Canvas, EBMC)에 매핑시키고, 세부 구성요소를 분석한다. 셋째, EBMC의 구성요소에서 그룹화하여 추출된 어반 리빙랩의 특성을 제시하고, 그 특성을 기반으로 어반 리빙랩의 지속가능한 발전을 위한 제언을 한다.
Abstract
Innovation processes are highly important in solving big societal challenges that exist on a global scale such as climate change, ageing cities, and health and mobility issues. The role of cities and the urban context is crucial in this aspect. Urban Living Labs is a great methodology for solving these modern city challenges through the complex integration of multi-dimensional solutions. This study analyzed the cases of the Malleswaram Urban Living Lab (M-ULL) in Bengaluru and the Panaji Project Urban Living Lab (P-PULL) in Goa in the context of improving walkability in urban areas in India. The research method was as follows. First, the selected living lab cases were explained according to the innovation development process. Second, the 20 evaluation criteria of the European Network of Living Labs (ENoLL) were mapped to the components of the Extended Business Model Canvas (EBMC). Based on this, a Stakeholder Map of Living Lab was analyzed. Third, the characteristics of Urban Living Lab (ULL) were presented by grouping in the components of the Extended BMC. And based on the suggested characteristics, we offer a Proposition for the sustainable development of an Urban Living Lab.
참고문헌 (37)
- 손정렬, "남아시아의 스마트시티: 구조와 방향" (2022), 진인진
- 손현식, "유럽 사례분석을 통한 어반 리빙랩(Urban Living Lab) 추진전략 연구", 대한건축학회논문집, 37(6), pp.137~148 (2021), 대한건축학회
- Akasaka, F., "Towards building infrastructure for living lab practices", Transactions of Human Interface Society, 24(1), pp.11~22 (2022)
- "Test and experimentation platforms for broadband innovation:Examining European practice" (2005)[URL]
- Bartelt, V. L., "Enabling collaboration and innovation in Denver’s smart city through a living lab: A social capital perspective", European Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), pp.369~387 (2020)
- Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., "A milieu for innovation: Defining living labs", Proceedings of the 2nd ISPIM Innovation Symposium: Simulating Recovery - the Role of Innovation Management (2009), The Fashion Institute of Technology
- Bhandari, A., "Inclusive Streets Inclusivity In Action", Project Urban Living Lab, ~ (2021)
- Buhl, J., "Rebound effects in living labs: Opportunities for monitoring and mitigating re-spending and time use effects in user integrated innovation design", Journal of Cleaner Production, 151, pp.592~602 (2017)
- Chronéer, D., "Urban living labs: Towards an integrated understanding of their key components", Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(3), pp.50~62 (2019)
- City of Panaj, "Panaji Smart City Proposal: Annexure 2", Corporation of the City of Panaji, ~ (2018)
- "Smart City Proposal, Bengaluru:Annexure" (2017)[URL]
- Stateof-the-art in utilizing living labs approach to user-centric ICT innovation: A European approach, "Eriksson, M.", Center for Distance-spanning Technology, Lulea University of Technology, ~ (2005)
- European Network of Living Labs, "The Living Lab Methodology Handbook" (2017), European Network of Living Labs
- European Network of Living Labs, "LiIving Lab Project 2020: Co-creation and Experimentation in Real Life & Digital Environments", European Network of Living Labs, ~ (2020)
- Evans, J., "Living labs and co-production: university campuses as platforms for sustainability science", Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, (16), pp.1~6 (2015)
- Eweg, R., "Living Labs: Innovating environments for metropolitan food production", Finding Spaces for Productive Cities, Proceedings of the 6th AESOP Sustainable Food Planning Conference (2014)
- Farm, D., "Universities as Living Labs for Sustainable Development", pp.167~182 (2020), Springer
- Do Living Labs Live in Russia?, "Kokareva, A.", National Research University Higher School of Economics, ~, pp.Higher School of Economics Research Paper WP BRP 81 (2018)
- Leminen, S., "A framework for understanding the different research avenues of living labs", International Journal of Technology Marketing, 11(4), pp.399~420 (2016)
- Leminen, S., "Categorization of innovation tools in living labs", Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1), pp.15~25 (2017)
- Leminen, S., "The effect of network structure on radical innovation in living labs", Journal of Business &Industrial Marketing, 31(6), pp.743~757 (2016)
- Liu, H., "Analysis of sustainable urban development approaches in China", Habitat Internationa, 41, pp.24~32 (2014)
- Mastelic, J., "How to keep a living lab alive? Applying business model canvas criteria to the ENoLL evaluation process", Conference Proceedings of OpenLivingLab Days 2014 (2014), European Network of Living Labs
- Nyström, A. G., "Actor roles and role patterns influencing innovation in living labs", Industrial Marketing Management, 43(3), pp.483~495 (2014)
- Mastelic, J., "How to keep a living lab alive?", info, 17(4), pp.12~25 (2015)
- Osterwalder, A., "Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries. Game Changers, and Challengers" (2010), Wiley
- "Project Urban Living Lab"[URL]
- Rodrigues, M., "Importance of living labs in urban entrepreneurship: A Portuguese case study", Journal of Cleaner Production, 180, pp.780~789 (2018)
- Santonen, T., "Comparison of Health and Wellbeing Living Lab Business Models: Preliminary result based on Business Model Canvas Evaluation", Research and Innovation Conference Proceedings 2018, OpenLivingLabs Days 2018, pp.339~357 (2018), European Network of Living Labs
- Schaffers, H., "Living Labs for cross-border systemic innovation", Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9), pp.25~30 (2012)
- Schuurman, D., "Bridging the Gap between Open and User Innovation? Exploring the Value of Living Labs as a Means to Structure User Contribution and Manage Distributed Innovation", Ph.D, pp.2015
- Schuurman, D., "Open Innovation Processes in Living Lab Innovation Systems:Insights from the LeYLab", Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11), pp.28~36 (2013)
- Walkable Malleswaram: Planning and Assessment Report, "Sensing Local", Sensing Local, ~ (2021)
- Smart Cities Mission, "Making a City Smart: Learning from the Smart Cities Mission", Smart Cities Mission, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Government of India, ~ (2021)
- Ståhlbröst, A., "A set of key principles to assess the impact of living labs", International Journal of Product Development, 17(1-2), pp.60~75 (2012)
- Zavratnik, V., "Living Labs for rural areas: Contextualization of Living Lab frameworks, concepts and practices", Sustainability, 11(14), pp.1~17 (2019)
- Zott, C., "Business model design: an activity system perspective", Long range planning, 43(2-3), pp.216~226 (2010)