술부부사의 사건구조 기술에 관한 연구
Event-Structural Description of Some Adverbs
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to describe the meanings of some adverbs based on the event-structural semantics. The subclass of the adverb depends on the syntactic and semantic view of points. Traditionally the adverbs in syntax can be analyzed into a two major categories such as the sentential adverbs and the predicate adverb. On the other hand, the subclass of adverb in semantics is classified with the argument of modified constituent. However, the adverbs can be treated as a predicate of the event or individual as their arguments. It means that the adverbs take the sub-event which verbs represent, when decomposing the meaning of the verb. For instance, some adverb takes the ‘x CAUSE y' and ‘x BECOME y' as the arguments. We argue that it is necessary to introduce the some operators such as <, ∋, CR, UNDER. < represents the order of the event occurrence and ∋ represents the relation between two events, and one event is of a member of the other event. The CR is the contextual restriction, that is, the event can be interpreted in given domain. And the operator UNDER is a function from the event to the event. We try to describe the four different kinds of adverbs as the representative adverb having event structural meaning. That is the domain adverb, restitutive adverb, manner adverb, and measure adverb.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to describe the meanings of some adverbs based on the event-structural semantics. The subclass of the adverb depends on the syntactic and semantic view of points. Traditionally the adverbs in syntax can be analyzed into a two major categories such as the sentential adverbs and the predicate adverb. On the other hand, the subclass of adverb in semantics is classified with the argument of modified constituent. However, the adverbs can be treated as a predicate of the event or individual as their arguments. It means that the adverbs take the sub-event which verbs represent, when decomposing the meaning of the verb. For instance, some adverb takes the ‘x CAUSE y' and ‘x BECOME y' as the arguments. We argue that it is necessary to introduce the some operators such as <, ∋, CR, UNDER. < represents the order of the event occurrence and ∋ represents the relation between two events, and one event is of a member of the other event. The CR is the contextual restriction, that is, the event can be interpreted in given domain. And the operator UNDER is a function from the event to the event. We try to describe the four different kinds of adverbs as the representative adverb having event structural meaning. That is the domain adverb, restitutive adverb, manner adverb, and measure adverb.
참고문헌 (17)
- 이영헌, "평가부사와 증거부사의 의미 기술", 영어영문학21, 21(2), pp.151~171 (2008), 21세기영어영문학회
- 이환묵, "영어부사에 관한 연구: 문장부사와 술부부사의 차이를 중심으로", 영어영문학, 51(52) (1974)
- 이환묵, "문장부사 ‘다행히’에 대하여", 언어, 1(2) (1976)
- 李桓默, "국어 함수표현에 관한 연구 : 아니, 또, 도", 박사, pp.1982
- Davidson, D., "On The Logical Form of Action Sentences, In The Logic of Decision and Action" (1967), U of Pittsburgh P
- Ernst T., "Manners and Events, In Events as Grammatical Objects" (2000), CSLI
- Ernst T., "The Syntax of Adjuncts" (2002), Cambridge UP
- Ernst. T., "Towards an Intergrated Theory of Adverb Position in English" (1984), Indiana University Linguistics Club
- Hale, Kenneth, "On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations, In The View from Building 20 Essays in Lingusitics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger" (1993), MIT P
- Jackendoff, R., "Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar", MIT P (1972)
- Parsons, T., "Events in the semantics of English", MIT (1990)
- Tenny, C. L, "Aspectual Roles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface" (1994), Kluwer Dordrecht
- Tenny, C. L., "Core events and adverbial modification, In Events as Grammatical Objects" (2000), CSLI
- The Syntax of Adverbs in McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, Special Issue on Comparative German Syntax, "Travis, L.", McGill University, ~ (1988)
- Travis, L., "Event Structure in syntax, In Events as Grammatical Objects" (2000), CSLI
- Vendler. Z., "Linguistics in Philosophy" (1967), Cornell UP
- Voorst, J. Van, "Event Structure" (1988), John Benjamin