루소의 ‘자연’ 개념에 관한 연구
A Study on Rousseau's The Idea of Nature
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Lots of researchers have studied the meaning of nature by Rousseau. The idea of nature, however, is still one of the most controversial issues in studying Rousseau. This dissertation aims to examine the idea of nature on the historical context. The Ionions thought that nature itself circulates. Although they comprehended nature from the scientific point of view getting over the early myth, they thought nature from the view of hylozoism. The Pythagoreans claimed that whole the universe and nature is mystical and eternal. Nature has harmony in accordance with ratios of numbers. From their view human-being is microcosm while nature is macrocosm. Although Plato was affected by the Pythagoreans, he found the transcendence-theory instead of immanence-theory. He claimed that the material world as it seems to us is not the real world, but only an image or copy of the real world. Rousseau disagreed the modern idea of nature based on Enlightenment. He opposed rationality based on reason and rejected to regard nature as a huge machine. He borrowed ideas from the understanding of nature by ancient Greek. He was influenced by the Ionions, Pythagoreans, and Plato and he believed the power of nature organizing the order. Borrowing the macrocosm-microcosm model of ancient Greek, he claimed that human being has capacity to follow the order of nature. He insisted that human being has self love, compassion and perfectibility which are given from nature itself as a microcosm and thus he should be accorded to the order of nature as macrocosm.
Abstract
Lots of researchers have studied the meaning of nature by Rousseau. The idea of nature, however, is still one of the most controversial issues in studying Rousseau. This dissertation aims to examine the idea of nature on the historical context. The Ionions thought that nature itself circulates. Although they comprehended nature from the scientific point of view getting over the early myth, they thought nature from the view of hylozoism. The Pythagoreans claimed that whole the universe and nature is mystical and eternal. Nature has harmony in accordance with ratios of numbers. From their view human-being is microcosm while nature is macrocosm. Although Plato was affected by the Pythagoreans, he found the transcendence-theory instead of immanence-theory. He claimed that the material world as it seems to us is not the real world, but only an image or copy of the real world. Rousseau disagreed the modern idea of nature based on Enlightenment. He opposed rationality based on reason and rejected to regard nature as a huge machine. He borrowed ideas from the understanding of nature by ancient Greek. He was influenced by the Ionions, Pythagoreans, and Plato and he believed the power of nature organizing the order. Borrowing the macrocosm-microcosm model of ancient Greek, he claimed that human being has capacity to follow the order of nature. He insisted that human being has self love, compassion and perfectibility which are given from nature itself as a microcosm and thus he should be accorded to the order of nature as macrocosm.
참고문헌 (60)
- 강성훈, "루소사상에서 정치적 이데올로기로서의 ‘종교’: 플라톤과의 비교를 중심으로", 교육철학연구, (49), pp.1~24 (2010), 한국교육철학학회
- 고봉만, "시원(始原)의 신화와 루소의 사상체계", 프랑스학연구, (31), pp.29~51 (2005), 프랑스학회
- 김상섭, "루소에 있어서 사적 가정교육과 공적 시민교육의 통합문제", 교육철학연구, (29), pp.1~25 (2003), 한국교육철학학회
- 김상섭, "현대인의 교사 루소" (2009), 학지사
- 김수동, "루소의 자연주의 교육사상" (1997), 문음사
- 김용민, "루소의 정치철학" (2007), 인간사랑
- 김재홍, "그리스 사유의 기원" (2006), 길
- 박영욱, "루소의 사회 계약론의 방법론적 의미" (2002), 시대와 철학
- 박주병, "루소의 ‘소극적 교육’의 의미", 도덕교육연구, 19(2), pp.145~170 (2008), 한국도덕교육학회
- 박호성, "루소의 자연개념-‘비판적’ 자연과 ‘창조적’", 자연 (1993), 한국정치학회보
- 박호성, "루소 사상의 이해" (2009), 인간사랑
- 송유진, "루소의 교육과 아동의 행복 : 『에밀』: 제2권을 중심으로", 교육철학, (36), pp.93~116 (2008), 한국교육철학회
- 신응철, "캇시러의 문화철학" (2000), 한울아카데미
- 안인희, "루소의 자연교육사상" (1992), 이대출판부
- 이혜령, "쟝 쟈끄 루쏘의 자연법 사상 : 자연 상태를 중심으로", 서양사연구, (9) (1988)
- 임태평, "루소와 칸트,교육에 관하여" (2008), 교육과학사
- 임태평, "교육철학" (2010), 교육출판사
- 주영흠, "자연주의 교육사상" (2003), 학지사
- Albert, K, "플라톤 철학과 헬라스 종교" (1980), 아카넷
- Berlin, I, "낭만주의의 뿌리" (2005), 이제이북스
- Bloom, A. trans, "에밀" (2005), 한길사
- Boyd, W, "서양교육사" (1964), 교육과학사
- 유한구, "서양교육사" (2008), 교육과학사
- Bronowski, J, "서양의 지적전통" (1960), 학연사
- Leonard to Hegel, "서양의 지적전통" (2008), 학연사
- Cassirer, E, "An Essay on Man.Yale.최명관 역(2008)" (2008), 창
- Collingwood, R. G, "자연이 라는 개념" (1960), 이제이북스
- Cornford, F. M, "소크라테스 이전과 이후" (1932), 박영사
- Cornford, F. M, "종교에서 철학으로" (2004), 이화여대출판부
- Cornford, F. M, "쓰여지지 않은 철학" (2008), 라티오
- Cropsey, J, "서양정치사상사 2" (2007), 인간사랑
- Damrosch, L, "루소-인간 불평등의 발견자" (2011), 교양인
- Dewey,J, "민주주의 와 교육" (1916), 교육과학사
- Dickinson,G.L, "그리스인의 이상과 현실" (1967), 서광사
- Diels. H, "소크라테스 이전 철학자들의 단편 선집" (1903), 아카넷
- Egan,K, "The Future of Education. New Haven and London" (2008), Yale University Press
- Eliade,M, "영원회 귀의 신화" (1949), 이학사
- Goertz,H.J, "역사학이 란 무엇인가" (2003), 뿌리와 이파리
- Guthrie, W. K. C, "희랍철학 입문" (1960), 서광사
- Hare, R. M, "플라톤의 이해" (1982), 문학과 지성사
- 박구용, "도구적 이성 비판" (2006), 문예출판사
- Lejeune,P, "문학과 지성사" (1975), 자서전의 규약
- Melzer, A. M, "ROUSSEAU AND THE PROBLEM OF BOURGEOIS SOCIETY JEAN-JACQUES ROUSSEAU. Critical Assessments of Leading Political Philosophers" (2006), Routledge
- Plamenatz, J. P, "정치사상사 2" (1965), 풀빛
- Plato, "티마이오스" (1902), 서광사
- Plato, "에우 티프론, 변론, 크리톤, 파이돈" (2006), 서광사
- Plato, "국가" (2005), 서광사
- Reisert,J.R, "Jean-Jacques Rousseau-A Friend of Virtue" (2003), cornell university press
- Roger D. M, "학문예술론, 보르드씨에게 보내는 두 번째 편지 서문" (2007), 한길사
- Roger D. M, "인간불평등기원론" (2009), 책세상
- 김중현, "사회계약론" (2010), 웅진씽크빅
- Snell, B, "정신의 발견" (2006), 까치
- Strauss, L, "야생의 사고" (1996), 한길사
- Strauss, L, "자연권과 역사" (2001), 인간사랑
- Strauss, L, "슬픈 열대" (2006), 한길사
- Strenski, I, "20세기 신화이론" (2008), 이학사
- 고봉만, "덧없는 행복 - 루소 사상의 현대성에 관한 시론" (2006), 문학과지성사
- 김재홍, "그리스 사유의 기원" (2006), 길
- Vernant, J. P, "그리스인들의 신화와 사유" (2005), 아카넷
- Wokler,R, "ROUSSEAU A Very Short Introduction" (2001), Oxford University