본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

演示的談話としての「夢語り」 -中世日本の「夢語り共同体」における機能-

Dream-Telling as Epideictic Discourse -Its Functions in the Dream-Telling Community in the Medieval Period in Japan-

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

This paper aims to demonstrate from the perspective of rhetoric that what is called “dream-telling communities,” although seen as peculiar occurrences particularly identified in the medieval period in Japan, are a universal activity of human beings that makes society work. The dream-telling community is a sort of society formed by those who are aware of their being aboard the same boat and, by sharing their dream narrations, nurture their sense of unity, with the intensified aspiration for their shared ambition. The act of dream-telling, making the individual experience of dreaming dreams shareable with community members, turns it into being social. This paper argues that the act of dream-telling, which is indispensable for the formation of dream-telling communities, plays a role of epideictic discourse. Typically identified as ceremonial oratories, the epideictic, one of the three types of rhetoric identified by Aristotle, concerns praise and/or blame. Ch. Perelman and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca (1971) foregrounded the hitherto underestimated importance of the epideictic; “it strengthens the disposition toward action by increasing adherence to the values it lauds” (70).

Abstract

This paper aims to demonstrate from the perspective of rhetoric that what is called “dream-telling communities,” although seen as peculiar occurrences particularly identified in the medieval period in Japan, are a universal activity of human beings that makes society work. The dream-telling community is a sort of society formed by those who are aware of their being aboard the same boat and, by sharing their dream narrations, nurture their sense of unity, with the intensified aspiration for their shared ambition. The act of dream-telling, making the individual experience of dreaming dreams shareable with community members, turns it into being social. This paper argues that the act of dream-telling, which is indispensable for the formation of dream-telling communities, plays a role of epideictic discourse. Typically identified as ceremonial oratories, the epideictic, one of the three types of rhetoric identified by Aristotle, concerns praise and/or blame. Ch. Perelman and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca (1971) foregrounded the hitherto underestimated importance of the epideictic; “it strengthens the disposition toward action by increasing adherence to the values it lauds” (70).

참고문헌 (44)

  1. アリストテレス, "アリストテレス全集18 弁論術詩学" (2017), 岩波書店
  2. 秋山虔, "原色新日本文学史", pp.34~ (2000), 文英堂
  3. カイヨワ, R, "夢と人間社会 上", pp.35~42 (1978), 法政大学出版局
  4. 河東仁, "日本の夢信仰 宗教学から見た日本精神史", pp.8~503 (2002), 玉川大学出版部
  5. 香西秀信, "教材研究『ジュリアス・シーザ—』(明示書院 『基本国語Ⅱ新修版』)─ある修辞学徒の偏見─", 宇都宮大学教育学部紀要, 38(1), pp.1~20 (1988), 宇都宮大学教育学部
  6. 西郷信綱, "古代人と夢", pp.13~219 (1993), 平凡社
  7. 酒井紀美, "夢から探る中世", pp.7~215 (2005), 角川書店
  8. 酒井紀美, "夢の日本史", pp.2~166 (2017), 勉誠出版
  9. 酒井紀美, "夢語り・夢解きの中世", pp.13~157 (2021), 吉川弘文館
  10. 菅原昭英, "夢を信じた世界 九条兼実とその周囲", 日本学, 2(1), pp.53~54 (1984), 名著刊行会
  11. デュルケーム, E, "社会学的方法の規準" (2018), 講談社
  12. ペレルマン, Ch, "説得の論理学 新しいレトリック" (1980), 理想社
  13. ペレルマン, Ch, "法律家の論理" (1986), 木鐸社
  14. 横井清, "岩波講座 日本通史 第9巻 中世3", pp.321~322 (1994), 岩波書店
  15. 横井清, "中世文化史における「夢」の問題(一)", 国際文化論集, 11, pp.21~22 (1995), 桃山学院大学総合研究所
  16. 横井清, "室町時代の一皇族の生涯『看聞日記』の世界", pp.21~213 (2002), 講談社
  17. Amossy, R., "L’Argumentation dans le discours", pp.16~17 (2010), Armand Colin
  18. Bostdorff, D. M., "Epideictic rhetoric in the service of war: George W. Bush on Iraq and the 60th anniversary of the victory over Japan", Communication Monographs, 78(3), pp.296~297 (2011)
  19. Bostdorff, D. M., "John F. Kennedy at American University:The rhetoric of the possible, epideictic progression, and the commencement of peace", Quarterly Journal of Speech, 100(4), pp.411~412 (2014)
  20. Casper, C. F., "In praise of carbon, in praise of science: The epideictic rhetoric of the 1996 Nobel lectures in chemistry", Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 21(3), pp.304~ (1996)[DOI]
  21. Condit, C. M., "The functions of epideictic : The Boston Massacre orations as exemplar", Communication Quarterly, 33(4), pp.289~290 (1985)[DOI]
  22. Dow, B. J., "The function of epideictic and deliberative strategies in presidential crisis rhetoric", Western Journal of Communication, 53(3), pp.297~ (1989)
  23. Fairclough, I., "Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students", pp.81~92 (2012), Routledge
  24. Fairclough, I., "Argument, deliberation, dialectic and the nature of the political:A CDA perspective", Political Studies Review, 11, pp.339~ (2013)
  25. Firclough, N., "Discourse and social change", pp.3~ (1992), Polity Press
  26. Fairclough, N., "Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction Vol. 2", pp.258~284 (1997), SAGE
  27. Frank, D., "From vita contemplative to vita activa : Chaim Perelman and Lucie Obbrechts-Tyteca’s rhetorical turn", Advances in the History of Rhetoric, 7, pp.79~80 (2004)
  28. Graff, R., "Presencing “communion” in chaïm Perelman’s new rhetoric", Philosophy & Rhetoric, 39(1), pp.47~50 (2006)
  29. Lauer, I., "Epideictic rhetoric", Communication Research Trends, 34(2), pp.5~ (2015)
  30. López, P. F., "The newspaper as an epideictic meeting point: On the epidictic nature of the newspaper argumentation", Argumentation, 29(3), pp.286~ (2015)
  31. McKenzie, R., "Audience involvement in the epideictic discourse of television talk shows", Communication Quarterly, 48(2), pp.194~196 (2000)
  32. Murphy, J. M., "Epideictic and deliberative strategies in opposition to war : The paradox of honor and expediency", Communication Studies, 43(2), pp.65~76 (1992)
  33. Petre, E. A., "Understanding epideictic purpose as invitational rhetoric in women’s political convention speeches", Kaleidoscope: A Graduate Journal of Qualitative Communication Research, 6, pp.21~ (2007)
  34. Perelman, Ch., "The realm of rhetoric", pp.9~20 (1982), University of Notre Dame Press
  35. Perelman, Ch., "The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation" (1971), University of Notre Dame Pres
  36. Potter, J., "Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour", pp.6~7 (1987), SAGE
  37. Sheard, C. M, "The public value of epideictic rhetoric", College English, 58(7), pp.774~790 (1996)
  38. Sullivan, D. L., "The ethos of epideictic encounter", Philosophy & Rhetoric, 36(2), pp.115~118 (1993)
  39. Sullivan, D. L., "Identification and dissociation in rhetorical exposé: An analysis of St. Irenaeus’ Against Heresies", Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 29(1), pp.50~53 (1999)
  40. Sullivan, D. H., "The epideictic dimension of Galatians as formative rhetoric : The inscription of early Christian community", Rhetorica, 18(2), pp.121~138 (2000)
  41. Tindale, C. W., "Argumentation in practice", pp.33~34 (2005), Johns Benjamins
  42. van Eemeren, F. H., "Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion", pp.9~ (1984), Foris
  43. Walton, D. N., "The place of emotion in argument", pp.91~92 (1992), The Pennsylvania State University Press
  44. Walton, D. N., "Media argumentation: Dialectic, persuasion, and rhetoric", pp.90~160 (2007), Cambridge University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)