価値としてのアジア －岡倉天心著『東洋の覚醒』の議論学的談話分析－
Asia as Value -A Discourse Analysis from a Perspective of Argumentation Studies on Okakura Tenshin’s The Awakening of the East-
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study, through a discourse analysis from a perspective of argumentation studies, addresses questions encountered in Okakura Tenshin (1863-1913)’s two works, The Ideals of the East, and The Awakening of the East. The questions prompted by considering historical contexts in which those two works were written are: 1) What motivated Okakura to proudly proclaim “Asia is one.” in The Ideals of the East? and 2) Was it the case that in the Awakening of the East Okakura indeed intended to encourage Asian people to fight against Western powers? First in the analysis, it is confirmed that in The Awakening of the East Asia is discursively constructed as an ethnic community, which is supposed to play an inevitable role in the formation of a nation. Next, a view is put forward that a practical reasoning, i.e., a reasoning that leads to a conclusion of the most possible appropriate action to do in a given circumstance, underlies a discourse of The Awakening of the East. Given that a practical reasoning can switch back and forth between an argumentation and an explanation according to context, the final phase of the analysis, by observing a relative weight shifted to the conclusion of the reasoning in the latter half of the work, demonstrates that the discourse of The Awakening of the East functions as an explanation. This leads to the conclusion that what Okakura indeed attempted to claim is that Asia is of irreplaceable value as an ethnic community. This is the way how this study reinforces that an approach from the viewpoint of argumentation studies can exert an effect on discourse analyses.
Abstract
This study, through a discourse analysis from a perspective of argumentation studies, addresses questions encountered in Okakura Tenshin (1863-1913)’s two works, The Ideals of the East, and The Awakening of the East. The questions prompted by considering historical contexts in which those two works were written are: 1) What motivated Okakura to proudly proclaim “Asia is one.” in The Ideals of the East? and 2) Was it the case that in the Awakening of the East Okakura indeed intended to encourage Asian people to fight against Western powers? First in the analysis, it is confirmed that in The Awakening of the East Asia is discursively constructed as an ethnic community, which is supposed to play an inevitable role in the formation of a nation. Next, a view is put forward that a practical reasoning, i.e., a reasoning that leads to a conclusion of the most possible appropriate action to do in a given circumstance, underlies a discourse of The Awakening of the East. Given that a practical reasoning can switch back and forth between an argumentation and an explanation according to context, the final phase of the analysis, by observing a relative weight shifted to the conclusion of the reasoning in the latter half of the work, demonstrates that the discourse of The Awakening of the East functions as an explanation. This leads to the conclusion that what Okakura indeed attempted to claim is that Asia is of irreplaceable value as an ethnic community. This is the way how this study reinforces that an approach from the viewpoint of argumentation studies can exert an effect on discourse analyses.
참고문헌 (47)
- "アリストテレス全集17 ニコマコス倫理学", pp.24~25 (2014), 岩波書店
- "アリストテレス全集18 弁論術･詩学", pp.34~38 (2017), 岩波書店
- 桶谷秀昭, "岡倉天心 人と思想", pp.216~237 (1982), 平凡社
- 塩川伸明, "民族とネイション─ナショナリズムという難問", pp.3~14 (2008), 岩波書店
- ジーゲルミューラー, G.W., "議論法 探求と弁論" (2006)
- 末木文美士, "近代日本の思想･再考I 明治思想家論", pp.288~ (2004), トランスビュー
- 菅沼晃, "インド神話伝説辞典", pp.159~165 (1985), 東京堂出版
- Smith, A.D., "ネイションとエスニシティ─歴史社会学的考察" (1999), 名古屋大学出版会
- スミス, A., "ナショナリズムの生命力" (1998), 昌文社
- 竹内好, "竹内好全集 第8巻", pp.162~176 (1980), 筑摩書房
- Tsutsui Akihiro, "岡倉天心著「東洋の覚醒」に現れたイデオロギー –antithesisに基づく談話分析–", 일본연구, (62), pp.333~356 (2014), 일본연구소[DOI]
- 筒井昭博, "エスニック共同体としてのアジア 岡倉天心｢アジアは一つ｣言説について", 2017年度 日中韓三国 日本言語文化に関する国際学術シンポジウム予稿集, pp.183~188 (2017)
- Tsutsui Akihiro, "岡倉天心『東洋の覚醒』における複問の虚偽 －議論学的視点からの談話分析－", 일본언어문화, (46), pp.35~58 (2019), 한국일본언어문화학회[DOI]
- Tsutsui Akihiro, "アジア主義と岡倉天心「アジアは一つ」言説", 비교일본학, 46, pp.71~86 (2019), 일본학국제비교연구소[DOI]
- 中島岳志, "アジア主義", pp.212~213 (2014), 潮出版社
- ペレルマン, C., "説得の論理学" (1980)
- ペレルマン, C., "法律家の論理" (1986)
- 松本健一, "竹内好｢日本のアジア主義｣精読", pp.94~ (2000), 岩波書店
- 三谷博, "近代日本とアジア 地政学的アプローチから", pp.1~4 (2016), 勉誠出版
- 宮川寅雄, "岡倉天心 人と思想", pp.202~215 (1982), 平凡社
- 山室信一, "思想課題としてのアジア─基軸･連鎖･投企─", pp.48~ (2001), 岩波書店
- Bharucha, R., "Another Asia Rabindranath Tagore & Okakura Tenshin", pp.51~ (2006), Oxford University Press
- Benwell, B., "Discourse and Identity", pp.4~ (2006), Edinburgh University Press
- Bex, F., "Argumentation and explanation in the context of dialogue", Explanation-aware Computing ExaCt, pp.6~7 (2012)
- Ching L., "Trajectories", pp.65~86 (1998), Routledge
- Damer, T. E., "Attacking Faulty Reasoning", pp.23~ (2009), Wordsworth
- De Fina, A., "Discourse Studies", pp.263~282 (2011), SAGE Publications
- Fairclough, N., "Discourse and Social Change", pp.61~73 (1992), Polity Press
- Fairclough, I., "Practical reasoning in political discourse: the UK government’s response to the economic crisis in the 2008Pre-Budget Report", Discourse & Society, 22(3), pp.243~268 (2011)
- Fairclough, I., "Exploring Argumentative Contexts", pp.23~42 (2012), John Benjamins
- Fairclough, I., "Political Discourse Analysis. A Method for Advanced Students", pp.39~51 (2012), Routledge
- Kock, C., "Defining Rhetorical Argumentation", Philosophy & Rhetoric, 46(4), pp.437~464 (2013)
- Korhonen P., "The Geography of Okakura Tenshin", Japan Review, 13, pp.107~128 (2001)
- Saaler, S., "Pan-Asianism A Documentary History Volume 1: 1850-1920", pp.1~2 (2011), Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
- Smith, A. D., "The Ethnic Origins of Nations", pp.32~ (1986), Blackwell Publishers
- Smith, A. D., "National Identity", pp.8~15 (1991), University of Nevada Press
- Tindale C. W., "Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument", pp.1999
- Tindale C. W., "Rhetorical Argumentation. Principles of Theory and Practice", pp.1~19 (2004), Sage
- Triandafyllidou, A., "Conceptual and Methodological Questions in the Study of Collective Identities: An Introduction", Journal of Language and Politics, 2(2), pp.205~223 (2003)
- Mayr, A., "Language and Power. An Introduction to Institutional Discourse", pp.7~8 (2008), Continuum
- van Eemeren, F. H., "Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse", pp.239~ (2010), John Benjamins
- van Eemeren, F.H., "A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach", pp.1~3 (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Walton, D., "How to Make and Defend a Proposal in Deliberation Dialogue", Artificial Intelligence and Law, 14(2006), pp.177~239 (2006)
- Walton, D., "Evaluating Practical Reasoning", Synthese, 157(2), pp.197~240 (2007)
- Walton, D., "Goal-based Reasoning for Argumentation", pp.20~ (2015), Cambridge University Press
- Wenzel, J. W., "Readings in Argumentation", pp.121~143 (1992), Foris Publications
- "岡倉天心全集１", pp.13~ (1980), 平凡社