유목적 주체와 가족 다양체- 드라마 ‘아일랜드’ 를 중심으로 -
The Nomadic Subject and Family Multiplicity -Focusing on a television drama "Ireland"-
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
Through the term "multiplicity(arrangement)" Deleuze and Guattari try to set up a model of the relationship between the subject and the other. And also they deny Freud's oedipalization through their book "Anti-Oedipus". The desiring-machine of schizophrenics examplifies the deterritorialized flows of desire, the process of life flow leading elsewhere beyond the oedipal codes. Deuleze and Guattari define as the essential reality the process of the production of a desiring-machine. In this article, I looked over the four main character's love, relationships and mode of building a family. Here, I recognized new a style of family and it can be explained with the term "multiplicity" or arrangement as used in Deuleze and Gattari. The four characters from "Island" draw a line of flight and made a new family multiplicity through new ways of producing desire. This is based on rhizome, however this family is neither broken nor abnormal. It is the only one dimension which shows the politics of production in the time of post-modernity. The drama of 'Island" attemts to deterritorialize and to draw a line of flight to displace the oedipalized family to a rhizome style multiplicity. It was shown the conventional meaning of family, desire and modes of thinking. Now, the structure of the labor market has changed and people have become extremely individualized. Family has to be beyond blood ties and marriage. At the same time, we can not explain desire only with the family romance structure. Deleuze and Gattari pointed out the problem of the Freudian family romance which confine everything to the family structure. It is a time to think about the post-modern mode of family through family multiplicity and the nomadic subject by Deuleze and Gattari.
참고문헌 (19)
- 기든스 앤소니, "친밀성의 구조변동-현대 사회의 성 사랑 에로티시즘" (2001)
- 김지영, "들뢰즈의 타자 이론", 비평과이론, 9(1), pp.49~80 (2004), 한국비평이론학회
- 김진옥, "울프의 올란도", 9(2) (2003)
- "프랑스 혁명의 가족로망스" (1992)
- 벡 울리히 외, "사랑은 지독한 그러나 너무나 정상적인 혼란" (2002), 새물결
- 오수원 역, "새로운 노마디즘을 향하여", (15) (1998)
- 서동욱, "들뢰즈의 초월적 경험론과 칸트" (2001), 한국칸트학회
- 서동욱, "들뢰즈와 레비나스에서 감성의 중요성―‘상처’의 경험에 관해서―", 철학과 현상학 연구, (20), pp.8~190 (2003), 한국현상학회
- 유재홍, "들뢰즈의 문학비평- 비인칭적 자아를 중심으로 -", 한국프랑스학논집, 41, pp.343~364 (2003), 한국프랑스학회
- 윤종범, "질 들뢰즈 연구" (1999), 상명대학교 어문학연구소
- 이동진, "가족 이동과 가족 중첩" (2002), 박영사
- 이박혜경, "끼어들기에 반대 한다" (2004)
- 이진우, "욕망의 계보학-니체와 들뢰즈를 중심으로", 니체연구, (6), pp.117~148 (2004), 한국니체학회
- 장시기, "들뢰즈 가타리의 몸철학과 페미니즘의 미래", (59) (2000)
- 최진석, "욕망과 혁명", (39) (2004)
- 푸코 미쉘, "성의 역사", 1 (1994), 나남 출판사
- 프로이트 지그문트, "토템과 타부" (2003), 열린 책들
- _ ,, "A Thousand Plateaus" (2003), Univ. of Minnesota
- Kang,, "The Flow of Desire in Deleuze and Guattari", (26) (2003)