『새로운 로빈슨』(Новые Робинзоны)에 나타난 ‘탈주’의 양상 고찰
Study on the aspect of 'Escape' appeared in 『New Robinson』
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
The things that a lot of thinkers who urge the critics and reflection on the pathological phenomena that the modern society have, pay attention in common are invisible control device that has expanded to the whole area of lives and oppression by the micro power, dissolve 'subject called system' and try the exploration on the possibility of escape from all kinds of invisible oppression, absurdity, and limitation. Russian comtemporary literature was not excepted from these kinds of characteristics. Most of all, after opening, the Post-Soviet literature was indulged and described 'individual subject' and the return 'to the daily routine' with the critics on the visible oppression and control, changing Russia that entered to the post capitalism, and social pathological phenomenon that he was belong, as a whole. This study has analyzed 『New Robinson』of Lyudmila Petrusepskaya that forms this escape desire directly. 『New Robinson』forms the desire of escape from the oppression and the reality of capture through a life of family that chooses absolute isolation and separation from the society. The sad thing about the escape can be breaking 'unconscious illusion' called escaping from the reality. Here, the unconscious illusion means a vague adoration and romantic imagination of modern people who want to be isolated from the irregular reality. Therefore, the escape of new Robinson is only a movement of another closed code and shows that it is not different from the escape from the reality eventually. Through the aspect of this kind of escape, the writer emphasizes that the dissolution of irregular reality and overcoming do not simply mean to escape to another cultural space. It prepares a clue to reflect the relationship between the world and people again in the time of chaos and loss. The complete isolation that 『New Robinson』seeks and tragedy soaked in freedom reflect the world view of the writer who seeks the communication between the literature and society and show his worries of 'closed aesthetics' of novel talking 'communication impossibility' that seeks excessive private freedom. For Petrusepskaya, the real escape should have the dynamic power that is born as the new subject through the dissolution of the reality confined in the reality. It agrees with the meaning of 'Chaosmos' and is a main factor that does not make『New Robinson』as a private novel of infiltrated with nihilism by the individual confinement. In conclusion, if Robinson Crusoe made a myth of survival and control in the isolated island for 26 years, the writer looks for a possibility that makes a myth of finding the subjective power of real reality dissolution in the reality that is not isolation and disconnection from the reality. That is, the myth of 『New Robinson』is not blind support for the breaking of gloomy time that does not have any exit but seeks the stepping stone for the building of mutual world living together even in the irregular society and dreams the born of the subject that leads the life and death battle in the detailed relationship with the world. The real social meaning of Robinson's changed 'new' and writer's spirit of critical literature of reality are inherent here.
참고문헌 (20)
- 근대영미소설학회, "18세기 영국소설강의" (1999), 신아사
- 오창은, "비평의 모음" (2005), 서울:실천문학사
- 윤우섭, "Л.Петрушевская 소설에 나타난 주거 공간의 사회학", 노어노문학, 2 (2008)
- 이홍균, "소외의 사회학" (2004), 한울아카데미
- 전경갑, "욕망의 통제와 탈주" (1999), 서울:한길사
- 정익순, "로빈슨 크루소:문학적 상상력" (2006), 철학과 현실사
- 폴 패튼, "들뢰즈와 정치" (2005), 태학사
- А.Барзах, "О рассказах Л.Петрушевской: Заметки аутсайдера", Постскриптум, ~ (1995), №1
- А.Бастриков, "Особенности женской картины мира(на материале текстов Л.Петрушевской)", ~ (2004), Русская и сопоставительная филология, Казань: КГУ изд
- А.В.Демичев, "Художественное пространство в рассказах Л.Петрушевскаой", ~ (2005), Восток-Запад пространство русской литературы, Волгоград: Волгоградское научное издательство
- А.Ганиева, "Мотивы изгойства и отчуждения в современной прозе", Новый мир, ~ (2007), № 3.
- А.Немзер, "Замечательное десятилетие (О русской прозе 90-х годов)", ~ (2003), Русская литература ХХ века в зеркале критики, Москва: Асадема
- В.Ерофеев, "Русские цветы зла", ~ (2003), Русская литература ХХ века в зеркале критики, Москва: Асадема
- арипова, "Хаосмос’ в повести Л. Петуршевской 『Время Ночь", ~ (2003), Международый академический журнал
- Д.Маркова, "Четвертое путешествие", намя, ~ (2003), №2
- Е.Щеглова, "Во тьму-или в никуда?", Нева, ~ (1995), № 8.
- Л.Петрушевская, "Новые Робинзоны?, Где я была Москва: Вагриус", ~ (2002)
- М. Липовецкий, "Трагедия и мало ли что еще", Новый мир, ~ (1994), №10.
- М.А.Черняк, "модель мира в современной антиутопии", ~ (2004), Современная русская литература, Москва: Сага-форум
- О.В.Багданова, "Технология мрака в прозе Людмилы Петрушевской", ~ (2004), Постмодернизм в контексте современной русской литературы, СПб., Фил-фак СПбГУ
