본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Osteoporosis on Reoperation Rates and Complications after Surgical Management of Lumbar Degenerative Disease

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류정형외과학

초록

Background: There is considerable heterogeneity in findings and a lack of consensus regarding the interplay between osteoporosis and outcomes in patients with lumbar degenerative spine disease. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to gather and analyze existing data on the effect of osteoporosis on radiographic, surgical, and clinical outcomes following surgery for lumbar degenerative spinal disease. Methods: A systematic review was performed to determine the effect of osteoporosis on the incidence of adverse outcomes after surgical intervention for lumbar degenerative spinal diseases. The approach focused on the radiographic outcomes, reoperation rates, and other medical and surgical complications. Subsequently, a meta-analysis was performed on the eligible studies. Results: The results of the meta-analysis suggested that osteoporotic patients experienced increased rates of adjacent segment disease (ASD; P=0.015) and cage subsidence (P=0.001) while demonstrating lower reoperation rates than non-osteoporotic patients (7.4% vs. 13.1%; P=0.038). The systematic review also indicated that the length of stay, overall costs, rates of screw loosening, and rates of wound and other medical complications may increase in patients with a lower bone mineral density. Fusion rates, as well as patient-reported and clinical outcomes, did not differ significantly between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic patients. Conclusions: Osteoporosis was associated with an increased risk of ASD, cage migration, and possibly postoperative screw loosening, as well as longer hospital stays, incurring higher costs and an increased likelihood of postoperative complications. However, a link was not established between osteoporosis and poor clinical outcomes.

Abstract

Background: There is considerable heterogeneity in findings and a lack of consensus regarding the interplay between osteoporosis and outcomes in patients with lumbar degenerative spine disease. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to gather and analyze existing data on the effect of osteoporosis on radiographic, surgical, and clinical outcomes following surgery for lumbar degenerative spinal disease. Methods: A systematic review was performed to determine the effect of osteoporosis on the incidence of adverse outcomes after surgical intervention for lumbar degenerative spinal diseases. The approach focused on the radiographic outcomes, reoperation rates, and other medical and surgical complications. Subsequently, a meta-analysis was performed on the eligible studies. Results: The results of the meta-analysis suggested that osteoporotic patients experienced increased rates of adjacent segment disease (ASD; P=0.015) and cage subsidence (P=0.001) while demonstrating lower reoperation rates than non-osteoporotic patients (7.4% vs. 13.1%; P=0.038). The systematic review also indicated that the length of stay, overall costs, rates of screw loosening, and rates of wound and other medical complications may increase in patients with a lower bone mineral density. Fusion rates, as well as patient-reported and clinical outcomes, did not differ significantly between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic patients. Conclusions: Osteoporosis was associated with an increased risk of ASD, cage migration, and possibly postoperative screw loosening, as well as longer hospital stays, incurring higher costs and an increased likelihood of postoperative complications. However, a link was not established between osteoporosis and poor clinical outcomes.

참고문헌 (70)

  1. Salari N, "The global prevalence of osteoporosis in the world : a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis", J Orthop Surg Res, 16, pp.609~ (2021)[DOI]
  2. Clynes MA, "The epidemiology of osteoporosis", Br Med Bull, 133, pp.105~117 (2020)[DOI]
  3. von Rüden C, "Failure of fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone", Injury, 47(Suppl 2), pp.S3~s10 (2016)[DOI]
  4. Sharma M, "Factors impacting outcomes and health care utilization in osteoporotic patients undergoing lumbar spine fusions : a marketscan database analysis", World Neurosurg, 141, pp.e976~e988 (2020)[DOI]
  5. Ravindra VM, "Degenerative lumbar spine disease : estimating global incidence and worldwide volume", Global Spine J, 8, pp.784~794 (2018)[DOI]
  6. Buchbinder R, "Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 11, pp.CD006349~ (2018)[DOI]
  7. Chandra RV, "Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures : what are the latest data?", AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 39, pp.798~806 (2018)[DOI]
  8. Papanastassiou ID, "Comparing effects of kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty, and non-surgical management in a systematic review of randomized and non-randomized controlled studies", Eur Spine J, 21, pp.1826~1843 (2012)[DOI]
  9. Formby PM, "Clinical and radiographic outcomes of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with osteoporosis", Global Spine J, 6, pp.660~664 (2016)[DOI]
  10. Page MJ, "The PRISMA 2020 statement : an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews", BMJ, 372, pp.n71~ (2021)[DOI]
  11. Concato J, "Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards analysis. I. Background, goals, and general strategy", J Clin Epidemiol, 48, pp.1495~1501 (1995)[DOI]
  12. Peduzzi P, "A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis", J Clin Epidemiol, 49, pp.1373~1379 (1996)[DOI]
  13. Austin PC, "Events per variable(EPV)and the relative performance of different strategies for estimating the out-of-sample validity of logistic regression models", Stat Methods Med Res, 26, pp.796~808 (2017)[DOI]
  14. Greco T, "Meta-analysis : pitfalls and hints", Heart Lung Vessel, 5, pp.219~225 (2013)
  15. "Data extraction template for included studies version 1.8" (2016)[URL]
  16. Guyatt G, "GRADE guidelines : 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables", J Clin Epidemiol, 64, pp.383~394 (2011)[DOI]
  17. Wright JG, "Introducing levels of evidence to the journal", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 85, pp.1~3 (2003)
  18. Löffler MT, "Opportunistic osteoporosis screening reveals low bone density in patients with screw loosening after lumbar semi-rigid instrumentation : a case-control study", Front Endocrinol(Lausanne), 11, pp.552719~ (2020)[DOI]
  19. Cho JH, "Effect of osteoporosis on the clinical and radiological outcomes following one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion", J Orthop Sci, 23, pp.870~877 (2018)[DOI]
  20. Zou D, "Computed tomography Hounsfield unit-based prediction of pedicle screw loosening after surgery for degenerative lumbar spine disease", J Neurosurg Spine, pp.1~6 (2020)[DOI]
  21. Bokov A, "Pedicle screws loosening in patients with degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine : potential risk factors and relative contribution", Global Spine J, 9, pp.55~61 (2019)[DOI]
  22. Sakai Y, "Hounsfield unit of screw trajectory as a predictor of pedicle screw loosening after single level lumbar interbody fusion", J Orthop Sci, 23, pp.734~738 (2018)[DOI]
  23. Lee CK, "An optimal cortical bone trajectory technique to prevent early surgical complications", Br J Neurosurg, 38, pp.208~214 (2024)[DOI]
  24. Ankrah NK, "Age, body mass index, and osteoporosis are more predictive than imaging for adjacent-segment reoperation after lumbar fusion", Surg Neurol Int, 12, pp.453~ (2021)[DOI]
  25. Maragkos GA, "Prognostic factors for adjacent segment disease after L4-L5 lumbar fusion", Neurosurgery, 86, pp.835~842 (2020)[DOI]
  26. Zhong ZM, "Adjacent segment disease after instrumented fusion for adult lumbar spondylolisthesis : incidence and risk factors", Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 156, pp.29~34 (2017)[DOI]
  27. Wang H, "Incidence and risk factors of adjacent segment disease following posterior decompression and instrumented fusion for degenerative lumbar disorders", Medicine(Baltimore), 96, pp.e6032~ (2017)[DOI]
  28. Kim JY, "Paraspinal muscle, facet joint, and disc problems : risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion", Spine J, 16, pp.867~875 (2016)[DOI]
  29. Min JH, "The clinical characteristics and risk factors for the adjacent segment degeneration in instrumented lumbar fusion", J Spinal Disord Tech, 21, pp.305~309 (2008)[DOI]
  30. Zhao L, "Clinical and radiological evaluation of cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral fixation", BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 23, pp.214~ (2022)[DOI]
  31. Jones C, "Endplate volumetric bone mineral density is a predictor for cage subsidence following lateral lumbar interbody fusion : a risk factor analysis", Spine J, 21, pp.1729~1737 (2021)[DOI]
  32. Yao YC, "Risk factors of cage subsidence in patients received minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion", Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 45, pp.E1279~E1285 (2020)[DOI]
  33. Mi J, "Vertebral body hounsfield units are associated with cage subsidence after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation", Clin Spine Surg, 30, pp.E1130~E1136 (2017)[DOI]
  34. Oh KW, "The correlation between cage subsidence, bone mineral density, and clinical results in posterior lumbar interbody fusion", Clin Spine Surg, 30, pp.E683~E689 (2017)[DOI]
  35. Peng L, "Risk factors and scoring system of cage retropulsion after posterior lumbar interbody fusion : a retrospective observational study", Orthop Surg, 13, pp.855~862 (2021)[DOI]
  36. Park MK, "Risk factors for cage migration and cage retropulsion following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion", Spine J, 19, pp.437~447 (2019)[DOI]
  37. Lee DY, "Risk factors for posterior cage migration after lumbar interbody fusion surgery", Asian Spine J, 12, pp.59~68 (2018)[DOI]
  38. Park SH, "Minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion followed by percutaneous translaminar facet screw fixation in elderly patients", J Neurosurg Spine, 10, pp.610~616 (2009)[DOI]
  39. Kim MC, "Subsidence of polyetheretherketone cage after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion", J Spinal Disord Tech, 26, pp.87~92 (2013)[DOI]
  40. Bjerke BT, "Incidence of osteoporosis-related complications following posterior lumbar fusion", Global Spine J, 8, pp.563~569 (2018)[DOI]
  41. Ajiboye RM, "Clinical and radiographic outcomes of concentrated bone marrow aspirate with allograft and demineralized bone matrix for posterolateral and interbody lumbar fusion in elderly patients", Eur Spine J, 24, pp.2567~2572 (2015)[DOI]
  42. Khalid SI, "Association of osteopenia and osteoporosis with higher rates of pseudarthrosis and revision surgery in adult patients undergoing single-level lumbar fusion", Neurosurg Focus, 49, pp.E6~ (2020)[DOI]
  43. Ehresman J, "Vertebral bone quality score and postoperative lumbar lordosis associated with need for reoperation after lumbar fusion", World Neurosurg, 140, pp.e247~e252 (2020)[DOI]
  44. Wolfert AJ, "The impact of osteoporosis on adverse outcomes after short fusion for degenerative lumbar disease", J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 30, pp.573~579 (2022)[DOI]
  45. Gerling MC, "Risk factors for reoperation in patients treated surgically for lumbar stenosis : a subanalysis of the 8-year data from the SPORT trial", Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 41, pp.901~909 (2016)[DOI]
  46. Jung JM, "The long-term reoperation rate following surgery for lumbar stenosis : a nationwide sample cohort study with a 10-year follow-up", Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 45, pp.1277~1284 (2020)[DOI]
  47. Kim CH, "The long-term reoperation rate following surgery for lumbar herniated intervertebral disc disease : a nationwide sample cohort study with a 10-year follow-up", Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 44, pp.1382~1389 (2019)[DOI]
  48. Aimar E, "Complications of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and stenosis surgery in patients over 80 s : comparative study with over 60 s and 70 s. Experience with 678 cases", Acta Neurochir(Wien), 164, pp.923~931 (2022)[DOI]
  49. St Jeor JD, "Average lumbar hounsfield units predicts osteoporosis-related complications following lumbar spine fusion", Global Spine J, 12, pp.851~857 (2022)[DOI]
  50. Koutsoumbelis S, "Risk factors for postoperative infection following posterior lumbar instrumented arthrodesis", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 93, pp.1627~1633 (2011)[DOI]
  51. Kim DH, "Association between degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinous process fracture after interspinous process spacer surgery", Spine J, 12, pp.466~472 (2012)[DOI]
  52. Lee BH, "Prognostic factors for surgical outcomes including preoperative total knee replacement and knee osteoarthritis status in female patients with lumbar spinal stenosis", J Spinal Disord Tech, 28, pp.47~52 (2015)[DOI]
  53. Abul-Kasim K, "Evaluation of implant loosening following segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis : a 2 year follow-up with low-dose CT", Scoliosis, 9, pp.13~ (2014)[DOI]
  54. Chen Y, "Subsidence of titanium mesh cage : a study based on 300 cases", J Spinal Disord Tech, 21, pp.489~492 (2008)[DOI]
  55. Jiya T, "Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using nonresorbable poly-ether-ether-ketone versus resorbable poly-L-lactide-co-D, L-lactide fusion devices : a prospective, randomized study to assess fusion and clinical outcome", Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 34, pp.233~237 (2009)[DOI]
  56. Ha SK, "Radiologic assessment of subsidence in stand-alone cervical polyetheretherketone(PEEK)cage", J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 44, pp.370~374 (2008)[DOI]
  57. Chosa E, "Analysis of the effect of lumbar spine fusion on the superior adjacent intervertebral disk in the presence of disk degeneration, using the three-dimensional finite element method", J Spinal Disord Tech, 17, pp.134~139 (2004)[DOI]
  58. Ekman P, "A prospective randomised study on the long-term effect of lumbar fusion on adjacent disc degeneration", Eur Spine J, 18, pp.1175~1186 (2009)[DOI]
  59. Park P, "Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion : review of the literature", Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 29, pp.1938~1944 (2004)[DOI]
  60. Tung JY, "Bone health status of children with spinal muscular atrophy", J Bone Metab, 30, pp.319~327 (2023)[DOI]
  61. Maruenda JI, "Adjacent segment degeneration and revision surgery after circumferential lumbar fusion : outcomes throughout 15 years of follow-up", Eur Spine J, 25, pp.1550~1557 (2016)[DOI]
  62. Schatzker J, "The holding power of orthopedic screws in vivo", Clin Orthop Relat Res, pp.115~126 (1975)[DOI]
  63. Weiser L, "Insufficient stability of pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae : biomechanical correlation of bone mineral density and pedicle screw fixation strength", Eur Spine J, 26, pp.2891~2897 (2017)[DOI]
  64. Coe JD, "Influence of bone mineral density on the fixation of thoracolumbar implants. A comparative study of transpedicular screws, laminar hooks, and spinous process wires", Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 15, pp.902~907 (1990)[DOI]
  65. Wittenberg RH, "Importance of bone mineral density in instrumented spine fusions", Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 16, pp.647~652 (1991)[DOI]
  66. Alvarez-Galovich L, "Safety and efficacy with augmented second-generation perforated pedicle screws in treating degenerative spine disease in elderly population", Int J Spine Surg, 14, pp.811~817 (2020)[DOI]
  67. Gazzeri R, "Minimally invasive spinal fixation in an aging population with osteoporosis : clinical and radiological outcomes and safety of expandable screws versus fenestrated screws augmented with polymethylmethacrylate", Neurosurg Focus, 49, pp.E14~ (2020)[DOI]
  68. Moon BJ, "Polymethylmethacrylate-augmented screw fixation for stabilization of the osteoporotic spine : a three-year follow-up of 37 patients", J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 46, pp.305~311 (2009)[DOI]
  69. Park MS, "Reoperation rates after posterior lumbar spinal fusion surgery according to preoperative diagnoses : a national population-based cohort study", Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 184, pp.105408~ (2019)[DOI]
  70. Okano I, "Endplate volumetric bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography as a novel predictive measure of severe cage subsidence after standalone lateral lumbar fusion", Eur Spine J, 29, pp.1131~1140 (2020)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)