현대 러시아의 학문구조와 문화학의 등장
The Academic Structure of Modern Russian and appearance of Culturology
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the academic area, the representative indication of Post-Soviet Russia is first revealed in the dismantlement of the existing composition between humanities and social science that had long been solidified at the Russian universities. Particularly, culturology(cultural studies) that had remained at the outskirts of the humanities discourses of the past is becoming so-called 21st century's integrated studies that go beyond humanities and cross and intersect the inter-studies boundary upon being regarded as a new area of studies since the mid 1990s. Such appearance of culturology is being considered as one of the most 'problematic' issues in the Russian academic field during the Post-Soviet era because of its speed of advancement, remarkable quantitative scale expansion and the controversy surrounding the identity of study. This study examines the actual condition and present circumstance of culturology centering on the background of appearance, advancement process and relation between culturology and literature. This is to examine how culturology that is 'being created' in modern Russia is responding to new social demands and establishing the self identity of the study based on its own tradition and heritage. The institutionalization process of the Russian culturology that occurred at the unprecedented speed in the last decade well shows the present condition faced by university education as well as issues and the Russian characteristics in the reconstruction of modern Russian studies. This process is the evidence that reveals the vagueness of identity of culturology as academic studies in spite of having become a department course within universities. Meanwhile, this process reminds of the national-level 'intentional' plan based on a certain agreement by the entire society on the tradition of 'literature-centrism' and 'Culture' contrary to the case in the West.
Abstract
In the academic area, the representative indication of Post-Soviet Russia is first revealed in the dismantlement of the existing composition between humanities and social science that had long been solidified at the Russian universities. Particularly, culturology(cultural studies) that had remained at the outskirts of the humanities discourses of the past is becoming so-called 21st century's integrated studies that go beyond humanities and cross and intersect the inter-studies boundary upon being regarded as a new area of studies since the mid 1990s. Such appearance of culturology is being considered as one of the most 'problematic' issues in the Russian academic field during the Post-Soviet era because of its speed of advancement, remarkable quantitative scale expansion and the controversy surrounding the identity of study. This study examines the actual condition and present circumstance of culturology centering on the background of appearance, advancement process and relation between culturology and literature. This is to examine how culturology that is 'being created' in modern Russia is responding to new social demands and establishing the self identity of the study based on its own tradition and heritage. The institutionalization process of the Russian culturology that occurred at the unprecedented speed in the last decade well shows the present condition faced by university education as well as issues and the Russian characteristics in the reconstruction of modern Russian studies. This process is the evidence that reveals the vagueness of identity of culturology as academic studies in spite of having become a department course within universities. Meanwhile, this process reminds of the national-level 'intentional' plan based on a certain agreement by the entire society on the tradition of 'literature-centrism' and 'Culture' contrary to the case in the West.
참고문헌 (39)
- 김수환, "텍스트 이론에서 문화 시학으로 - 로트만의 ‘행위 시학’ 방법론을 중심으로", 러시아어문학연구논집, (18), pp.103~136 (2005), 한국러시아문학회
- 김철균, "러시아 문학이론 교과서 변천 소사", 러시아어문학연구논집, (19), pp.9~34 (2005), 한국러시아문학회
- 바흐찐, 미하일, "프랑수아 라블레의 작품과 중세 및 르네상스의 민중문화" (2001), 아카넷
- 변현태, "문학에서 문화로, 문화에서 문학으로: 로뜨만의 문화기호학의 문예학적의의", 러시아어문학연구논집, (22), pp.281~310 (2006), 한국러시아문학회
- 삐에르 부르디, "장들의 몇 가지 특성, In 혼돈을 일으키는 과학" (1995), 솔
- 송승철, "문화연구-징후와 해답의 갈림길", 현대 비평과 이론, 8(2), pp.40~56 (1998)
- 이동연, "문학연구의 대안적 지식생산을 위한 질문", 문화, 2003, pp.34, 84~101
- 젠킨, "1970년대 소비에트 학계에서 이루어진 문화의 고찰", 현대러시아 문화세미나, pp.161~190 (2000), 미크로
- 조규형, "신역사주의: 조망과 전망", 현대 비평과 이론, 8(2), pp.57~79 (1998)
- 조유선, "포스트소비에트 산문에 나타난 작가의 초상 -뻬뜨로비치와 따따르스끼", 러시아어문학연구논집, (18), pp.279~304 (2005), 한국러시아문학회
- 조준래, "바흐친 미학의 문화철학적 함의", 세계문학비교연구, 5, pp.179~207 (2001)
- 조준래, "출판.비평과 문학의 다성화 - 러시아문학에서 ‘문학중심주의’의 개념과 ‘문학장’의 변화를 중심으로", 동유럽발칸연구, 16, pp.113~132 (2006), 동유럽발칸연구소
- 최문규, "기억과 망각 - 문학과 문화학의 교차점" (2003), 책세상
- 최문규, "문학과 문화학 - 그 한계와 가능성", 건지인문학, 2 (2009)
- 하르트무트 뵈메, "문화학이란 무엇인가" (2009), 성균관대학교출판부
- Арнольдов, А. И., "Введение в культурологию" (1993), НАКиОЦ
- Бахтин, М. М., "Эстетика словесного творчества" (1979), Искусство
- Гуревич, П. С., "Культурология" (2003), Проект
- Драч, Г. В., "Учебный курс по культурологии" (1999), Феникс
- Есин, А. Б., "Введение в культурологию" (1999), Академия
- Есин, А. Б., "Литературоведение. Культурология: избранные труды" (2002), Флинта
- "Филологическая иллюзия и её будущность" (2001)[URL]
- Кравченко, А. И., "Культурология" (2003), Академический проект
- "Болонская реформа образования: плюсы и минусы глазами Маяцкого" (2010)[URL]
- "03.25 검색)" (2003)[URL]
- "Плюсы и минусы болонского процесса для Россия (финам FM)" (2009)[URL]
- Ралугин, А. А., "Культурологияю" (2001), Центр
- Розанов, В. В., "О писательстве и писателях" (1995), Собр. соч
- "О бедной науке замолвите слово" (2000)[URL]
- Флиер, А. Я., "Культурология для культурологов" (2002), Академический Проект
- "Возможна ли культурология ка к 'чистая' наука"[URL]
- "Новый историзм, русская версия" (2001)[URL]