본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

비이동 겹목적어 구문의 구조와 생략의 치유 효과

The Structural Representation of the Non-Movement Multiple Object Construction and Repair by Deletion

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

Kim, Yong-Ha. 2010. The Structural Representation of the Non-Movement Multiple Object Construction and Repair by Deletion. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal. 18(1). 45-65. This paper, as a supplementary study to Y.-H. Kim (2006), tries to present the structural representation of the non-movement multiple object construction, and explain some related problems based on repair-by-deletion. Meanwhile, it also criticizes the debate on coordination and subordination in the realm of Korean linguistics. It will be clarified that the useless debate should be replaced by the establishment of the so-called adverbial constituent clause. Thus, the embedded clause of the construction in question should be regarded as an adjunct. On the other hand, this paper attempts to determine what is the identity of the subject of the adjunct clause. Finally, it discusses the effects of repair-by-deletion on some awkward examples that constitute a problem with Y.-H. Kim's (2006) analysis.

Abstract

Kim, Yong-Ha. 2010. The Structural Representation of the Non-Movement Multiple Object Construction and Repair by Deletion. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal. 18(1). 45-65. This paper, as a supplementary study to Y.-H. Kim (2006), tries to present the structural representation of the non-movement multiple object construction, and explain some related problems based on repair-by-deletion. Meanwhile, it also criticizes the debate on coordination and subordination in the realm of Korean linguistics. It will be clarified that the useless debate should be replaced by the establishment of the so-called adverbial constituent clause. Thus, the embedded clause of the construction in question should be regarded as an adjunct. On the other hand, this paper attempts to determine what is the identity of the subject of the adjunct clause. Finally, it discusses the effects of repair-by-deletion on some awkward examples that constitute a problem with Y.-H. Kim's (2006) analysis.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. 교육과학기술부, "고등학교 문법", 서울대학교 국어교육연구소, ~ (2009)
  2. 권재일, "국어의 복합문 구성 연구" (1985), 집문당
  3. 김영희, "종속 접속문의 통사적 양상. In: 들메 서재극 박사 환갑 기념 논문집" (1991), 계명대학교 출판부
  4. 김영희, "한국어 통사론을 위한 논의" (1998), 한국문화사
  5. 김영희, "종속 접속문의 조응 현상과 구조적 이중성", 國語學, 43(43), pp.247~272 (2004), 국어학회
  6. 김용석, "연결어미 ‘-는데’에 대하여", 배달말, 6, pp.269~291 (1981)
  7. 김용하, "한국어 격과 어순의 최소주의 문법" (1999), 한국문화사
  8. 김인택, "한국어 종속마디와 어찌마디", 국어국문학(부산대), 30, pp.273~298 (1983)
  9. 남기심, "접속어미와 부사형 어미", 말, 10, pp.69~77 (1985)
  10. 남기심, "표준국어문법론" (1985), 탑출판사
  11. 서정수, "접속어미 ‘ㄴ", 는데’에 관하여, 1973, pp.61, 452~454
  12. 安明哲, "副詞語 範疇의 體系化를 위하여", 어문연구(語文硏究), 29(3), pp.5~27 (2001), 한국어문교육연구회
  13. 유현경, "국어 접속문의 통사적 특질에 대하여", 한글, 191, pp.77~104 (1986)
  14. 를”의 연구, "국어 격 조사 “을", pp.1988, 이광호
  15. 이기동, "연결어미 ‘-는데’의 화용상의 기능", 인문과학, 40, pp.117~142 (1979)
  16. 이은경, "국어의 연결 어미 연구" (2000), 태학사
  17. 이익섭, "국어학 개설" (2000), 학연사
  18. 이익섭, "국어 부사절의 성립" (2003), 태학사
  19. 이익섭, "국어 문법론" (2003), 학연사
  20. 이익섭, "국어 문법론 강의" (1999), 학연사
  21. 임홍빈, "국어의 재귀사 연구" (1987), 신구문화사
  22. 최재희, "‘-고’ 접속문의 양상", 국어국문학, 94, pp.139~166 (1985)
  23. 최재희, "국어의 접속문 구성 연구" (1990), 탑출판사
  24. Ahn, S.-H, "Extrinsic topics and presupposition accommodation", Korean Journal of Linguistics, 17(2), pp.363~407 (1992)
  25. Baker, C, "A theory of command relations", Linguistics and Philosophy, 13, pp.1~34 (1990)
  26. Chomsky, N, "Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In: Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
  27. Halliday,M.A.K, "An introduction to functional grammar" (1994), Edward Arnold
  28. 장영준, "NP-split, Afterthought, and Counter-countercyclic Merger", 언어, 30(4), pp.693~713 (2005), 한국언어학회
  29. 정연진, "NP-Splits, Word Order and Multiple Case Mystery", 언어, 29(4), pp.547~588 (2004), 한국언어학회
  30. 정연진, "Partial Chain Pronunciation at the PF Interface", 생성문법연구, 15(4), pp.433~456 (2005), 한국생성문법학회
  31. 김광섭, "생략접사", 생성문법연구, 15(3), pp.275~292 (2005), 한국생성문법학회
  32. 김용하, "A Case for Ellipsis in Korean: The Non-Movement Multiple Object Construction", 생성문법연구, 16(4), pp.737~772 (2006), 한국생성문법학회
  33. Langacker,R.W, "On pronominalization and the chain of command. In: Modern studies in English", pp.160~186 (1969), Prentice-Hall
  34. Lasnik,H, "Remarks on coreference", Linguistic Analysis, 2, pp.1~22 (1976)
  35. Lasnik,H, "A note on pseudo-gapping. In: Papers on minimalist syntax: MIT working papers in linguistics 27", pp.143~163 (1995), MITWPL
  36. Lasnik,H, "On repair by ellipsis", In Proceedings of the 2002 LSK Summer Conference Volume I, pp.23~36 (2002)
  37. Lyons,J, "Introduction to theoretical linguistics" (1968), Cambridge University Press
  38. Quirk, R, "A grammar of contemporary English" (1972), Longman
  39. Reinhart,T, "The syntactic domain of anaphora", 박사, pp.1976
  40. Ross, J. R, "Constraints on variables in syntax", 박사, pp.1967

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)