2016년 경주지진과 2011년 미국 버지니아지진에 대한 비교 연구 및 사례 분석
A Comparative Case Study of 2016 Gyeongju and 2011 Virginia Earthquakes
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A Gyeongju earthquake in the magnitude of 5.8 on the Richter scale (the moment magnitude of 5.4), which was recorded as the strongest earthquake in Korea, occurred in September 12, 2016. Compared with the 2011 Virginia earthquake, the moment magnitude was slightly smaller and its duration was 3 seconds, much shorter than 10 seconds of the Virginia earthquake, resulting in relatively minor damage. But the two earthquakes are quite similar in terms of the overall scale, unexpectedness, and social situation. The North Anna Nuclear Power Plant, which is a nuclear power plant located at 18 km away from the epicenter of the Virginia earthquake, had no damage to nuclear reactors because the reactors were automatically shut down as the design basis earthquake value was exceeded. Ground accelerations of the 2016 Gyeongju earthquake did not exceed the threshold value but the manual shutdown was carried out so that Wolsong Nuclear Power Site was not damaged. Damaged historic homestead house and masonry structures due to the Virginia earthquake have been repaired, reinforced, and rebuilt based on a long-term earthquake recovery project. Likewise, it will be necessary to carefully carry out an earthquake recovery planning program to improve overall seismic performance and to reconstruct the historic buildings and structures damaged as a result of the Gyeongju earthquake.
Abstract
A Gyeongju earthquake in the magnitude of 5.8 on the Richter scale (the moment magnitude of 5.4), which was recorded as the strongest earthquake in Korea, occurred in September 12, 2016. Compared with the 2011 Virginia earthquake, the moment magnitude was slightly smaller and its duration was 3 seconds, much shorter than 10 seconds of the Virginia earthquake, resulting in relatively minor damage. But the two earthquakes are quite similar in terms of the overall scale, unexpectedness, and social situation. The North Anna Nuclear Power Plant, which is a nuclear power plant located at 18 km away from the epicenter of the Virginia earthquake, had no damage to nuclear reactors because the reactors were automatically shut down as the design basis earthquake value was exceeded. Ground accelerations of the 2016 Gyeongju earthquake did not exceed the threshold value but the manual shutdown was carried out so that Wolsong Nuclear Power Site was not damaged. Damaged historic homestead house and masonry structures due to the Virginia earthquake have been repaired, reinforced, and rebuilt based on a long-term earthquake recovery project. Likewise, it will be necessary to carefully carry out an earthquake recovery planning program to improve overall seismic performance and to reconstruct the historic buildings and structures damaged as a result of the Gyeongju earthquake.
참고문헌 (24)
- "Korea Meteorological Administration" (2016)[URL]
- "USGS. M 5.4 – 6 km S of Kyonju, South Korea"[URL]
- 신동훈, "한반도 국지지진 규모식의 비교", 지질학회지, 51(4), pp.415~424 (2015), 대한지질학회[DOI]
- The 2011 Mineral, Virginia, earthquake, and its significance for seismic hazards in eastern North America-Overview and synthesis, "Horton JW Jr", Geological Society of America, 1~25, pp.Geological Society of America Special Paper 509 (2015)
- Sun CG, "Seismic properties of the Sep 12Gyeongju earthquake", Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea Special Session (2016)
- Kim IH, "Field investigation of the damages due to the Sep 12 Gyeongju earthquake", Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea Special Session (2016)
- "All Shook Up! The 2011 Virginia Earthquake"[URL]
- "Gyeongju earthquake (M 5.8) - Comparisons of waveform and spectrum among station MKL, USN, and DKJ" (2016)[URL]
- Jibson RW, "Extraordinary distance limits of landslides triggered by the 2011 Mineral, Virginia, earthquake", Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 102(6), pp.1~10 (2012)
- Lee CH, "Damage potentials of the 912 M 5.8 Gyeong-Ju earthquake and earthquake engineering implications", Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea Special Session (2016)
- "PEER Ground Motion Database"[URL]
- "M5.8 Mineral Virginia Earthquake of 23 Aug 2011"[URL]
- "Damage recovery situation of earthquake on 9.12 and future plan" (2016)[URL]
- FEMA, "Virginia-Earthquake,FEMA-4042-DR, Federal Emergency Manage A", ~ (2011)
- Beavers JE, "The August 23, 2011 Magnitude 5.8 Virginia Earthquake in the Eastern United States-An Engineering Perspective", Proceedings, 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering 2012 (15WCEE) (2012)
- The Mw 5.8 Virginia Earthquake of August 23, 2011, In Learning from Earthquakes, "EERI", EERI, 13~ (2011)
- "Safety nuclear power plant in Korea"[URL]
- "To establish Earthquakes Safety System for emergency situation"[URL]
- "Virginia Earthquake (DR-4042)"[URL]
- Swift CD, "Evaluation, Repairs, and Retrofits of the Historic Shearman Building in Washington DC Following the 2011 Mineral, VA Earthquake", Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Others Structuer, pp.97~108 (2015)
- Daw MJ, "Rescue Mission", Moden Steel Construction, pp.30~34 (2014)
- Park SC, "Unexpected-Earthquake 2011: Lessons to Be Learned", pp.23~38 (2014), Smithsonian Institute Scholarly Press
- Charola AE, "Unexpected-Earthquakes 2011 Lessons to Be Learned" (2014), Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press
- ASTM, "Standard Test Methods for In Situ Measurement of Masonry Mortar Joint Shear Strength Index.. ASTM C1531-09", American Society for Testing Materials, ~ (2009)