2016년 경주지진에 의한 국내 도시철도 교량의 잠재적손상평가
Damage Potential of a Domestic Metropolitan Railway Bridge subjected to 2016 Gyeongju Earthquake
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Damage potential has been investigated for a domestic metropolitan railway bridge subjected to 2016 Gyeongju earthquake which has been reported as the strongest earthquake in Korea. For this purpose, nonlinear static pushover analyses for the bridge piers have been carried out to evaluate ductility capacities. Then, the capacities have been compared with those suggested by Railway Design Standards of Korea. This comparison shows that all piers possess enough safety margins. Nonlinear dynamic time-history analysis has also been conducted to estimate both displacement and shear force demands for the bridge subjected to ground motions recorded at stations in near of Gyeongju. Maximum demands reveal that response under the ground motions remains essentially in elastic. In addition, for a further assessment of the bridge under the Gyeongju earthquake, fragility analyses have been performed using those ground motions. The fragility results indicate that the recorded earthquakes do not significantly affect the damage exceedance probability of the bridge piers.
Abstract
Damage potential has been investigated for a domestic metropolitan railway bridge subjected to 2016 Gyeongju earthquake which has been reported as the strongest earthquake in Korea. For this purpose, nonlinear static pushover analyses for the bridge piers have been carried out to evaluate ductility capacities. Then, the capacities have been compared with those suggested by Railway Design Standards of Korea. This comparison shows that all piers possess enough safety margins. Nonlinear dynamic time-history analysis has also been conducted to estimate both displacement and shear force demands for the bridge subjected to ground motions recorded at stations in near of Gyeongju. Maximum demands reveal that response under the ground motions remains essentially in elastic. In addition, for a further assessment of the bridge under the Gyeongju earthquake, fragility analyses have been performed using those ground motions. The fragility results indicate that the recorded earthquakes do not significantly affect the damage exceedance probability of the bridge piers.
참고문헌 (15)
- Sun CG, "Seismic properties of the Sep. 12Gyeongju earthquake", EESK Special Session (2016)
- "Korea Meteorological Administration"[URL]
- "Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources"[URL]
- ZeusNL-A system for inelastic analysis of structures, "Elnashai AS", Mid-America Earthquake Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, ~ (2002)
- Mander JB, "Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete", J. Struct. Eng, 114(8), pp.1804~1826 (1988)
- Martinez-Rueda JE, "Confined concrete model under cyclic load", Mater. Struct, 30(3), pp.139~147 (1996)
- Priestley MJN, "Seismic design and retrofit of bridges" (1996), John Wiley & Sons, Inc
- "Railway Design Standards", Korea Rail Network Authority, ~ (2013)
- Broderick BM, "Observations on the effect of numerical dissipation on the nonlinear dynamic response of structural systems", Eng. Struct, 16(1), pp.51~62 (1994)
- "Gyeongju earthquake (M 5.8) - Comparisons of waveform and spectrum among station MKL, USN, and DKJ" (2016)[URL]
- Baker JW, "Vector-valued ground motion intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand analysis", 박사
- Jeon JS, "DesRoches R. Damage assessment of older highway bridges subjected to three-dimensional ground motions: Characterization of shear-axial force interaction on seismic fragilities", Eng. Struct, 87, pp.47~57 (2015)
- Jeon JS, "Seismic fragility of lightly reinforced concrete frames with masonry infills", Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn, 44(11), pp.1783~1803 (2015)
- 이도형, "Seismic Fragility Analysis of a Buried Gas Pipeline Based on Nonlinear Time-History Analysis", International Journal of STEEL STRUCTURES, 16(1), pp.231~242 (2016), 한국강구조학회
- Jeon JS, "Post-repair effect of column jackets on aftershock fragilities of damaged RC bridges subjected to successive earthquakes", Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn, 45(7), pp.1149~1168 (2016)