GOLDEN 성격유형검사의 한국 타당화 연구
A Study on Validation of the Korean Version of the Golden Personality Type Profiler
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
연구목적: 본 연구의 목적은 Carl Jung의 성격유형론과 성격 5요인 모델을 통합한 Golden 검사(Golden Personality Type Profiler)를 15세 이상의 청소년 및 성인이 사용할 수 있도록 한국판으로 타당화하는 것이다. 연구방법: Golden 성격유형검사를 한국 실정에 맞게 번안하였고, 전국의 20대부터 60대까지 총 1,450명의 성인을 연구참여자로 선정하였다. 이후 Golden 검사의 요인구조를 확인하고, 신뢰도와 타당도를 검증하였다. 연구결과: 탐색적 요인분석을 통해 Golden 성격유형검사의 요인구조를 확인한 결과 5요인 구조가 가장 적절한 것으로 나타났다. 다음으로 확인적 요인분석을 실시한 결과 세부척도(Facet Scales)의 표준화 요인부하량이 대부분 적합하게 나타나 대응되는 포괄척도(Global Scales)의 하부요인으로 적합한 것으로 확인되었다. 또한 신뢰도와 타당도를 확인하기 위하여 내용타당도, 구인타당도, MBTI성격유형검사와의 공인타당도를 검증하였고 적절한 신뢰도 계수를 얻음으로써 Golden 검사의 신뢰도를 검증하였다. 논의 및 결론: 본 연구의 결과를 통해 성격검사에서 가장 신뢰를 받고 있는 성격 5요인(Big 5 Model)을 유지하면서 동시에 유형론이 가지는 유용성을 지닌 검사가 한국에서도 타당화 되었다는 점에서 의의를 지닌다. 특히 Jung의 성격유형론에 기반을 둔 기존의 성격유형검사에는 포함되지 않은 긴장(Tense)과 차분(calm) 척도와 36개의 세부척도를 활용한다면 실제 상담과 교육 현장에서의 유용한 도구가 될 수 있을 것이다.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to validate the Korean version of the Golden Personality Type Profiler as a for adolescents and adults over the age of 15 that incorporates Carl Jung's theory of personality types as well as the Big 5 model. Method: The Golden Personality Type Profiler was translated to fit the Korean situation, and a total of 1,450 adults, ranging in age from 20 to 60, were selected as research participants. We checked whether the Golden Personality Type Profiler had a valid factor structure, and reliability and validity were assessed. Results: First, through exploratory factor analysis, the factor structure of the Golden Personality Type Test was confirmed, and the 5-factor structure was presented as most appropriate. Next as a result of the confirmation factor analysis, most of the standardized factor loadings of the facet scales were found to be adequate, which was confirmed to be suitable for the sub-factors of the corresponding global scales. In addition, in order to confirm reliability and validity, this study verified content validity, construct validity, and concurrent validity of the MBTI personality type test. By obtaining a suitable reliability coefficient, this study also proved the Golden Personality Type Profiler to be a reliable test. Conclusion: There is significance to this study in that a test with the utility of typology has also been validated in Korea while maintaining the most trusted Big 5 Model. In particular, if tense/calm scales, and 36 facet scales, which are not included in the existing personality type test based on Jung's personality type theory, are used, Golden Personality Type Profiler can be a useful psychological instrument in the counseling and education field.
참고문헌 (60)
- 고영재, "당신이 알던 MBTI는 진짜 MBTI가 아니다" (2022), 인스피레이션
- 김경성, "Likert 척도의 반응범주 수(3, 4, 5, 6단계)에 따른 초등학생용 심리검사의 신뢰도 비교", 한국초등교육, 31(1), pp.75~92 (2020), 초등교육연구원[DOI]
- 김정택, "MBTI 개발과 활용" (1995), 한국심리검사연구소
- 김창윤, "(융의 성격 유형론으로 깊이를 더하는)성격과 삶" (2020), 북캠퍼스
- 문희정, "성격 5요인을 기반으로 한 NEO 성격검사 성인용의 타당화 연구: 대학생을 대상으로", 인간이해, 41(1), pp.1~22 (2020), 학생생활상담연구소[DOI]
- 박철용, "MBTI의 의미" (2020), 하움
- 성태제, "현대교육평가" (2018), 학지사
- 심예은, "성격 5요인검사 단축형(BFI-SF) 타당화 연구", 인지발달중재학회지, 12(3), pp.105~134 (2021), 인지발달중재학회[DOI]
- ""혹시 열정적인 중재자?" 한국 사회 스며든 MBTI, 재미로 즐겨야" (2022)[URL]
- 안창규, "NEO 인성검사의 해석과 활용" (1997), 한국가이던스
- 안현의, "NEO 성격검사" (2017), 인싸이트 심리검사연구소
- 정승철, "성격5요인검사 성인용 매뉴얼" (2016), 한국가이던스
- 하대현, "5요인 성격검사의 타당화 연구", 사회 교육과학연구, 7(1), pp.41~68 (2003)
- "'나는 누구인가'...MZ세대가 MBTI에 빠진 이유는" (2022)[URL]
- 허용회, "민들레(2021년11-12월호 Vol.138)" (2021), 민들레
- Browne, M. W., "An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis", Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(1), pp.111~150 (2001)[DOI]
- Browne, M. W., "Alternative ways of assessing model fit", Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), pp.230~258 (1992)[DOI]
- "How Koreans fell in love with an American World War II era personality test" (2022)[URL]
- "Why have you heard of MBTI but not Golden?" (2018)[URL]
- Paul T. Costa, "Four ways five factors are basic", Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), pp.653~665 (1992), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Digman, J. M., "Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model", Annual Review of Psychology, 41, pp.417~440 (1990)
- DuBois, B., "An analysis of the meaning of the question mark response category in attitude scales", Educational and Psychological Measurement, 35(4), pp.869~884 (1975)[DOI]
- Ewen, R. B., "An introduction to theories of personality" (1993), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Donald W. Fiske, "Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources.", The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44(3), pp.329~344 (1949), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
- Furnham A., "The big five versus the big four : the relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator(MBTI)and NEO-PI five factor model of personality", Personality and Individual Differences, 21(2), pp.303~307 (1996)[DOI]
- Furnham A., "The relationship between the revised NEO-Personality Inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator", Social Behavior and Personality, 31(6), pp.577~584 (2003)[DOI]
- Goldberg, L. R., "Language and individual differences : The search for universals in personality lexicons", Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 2(1), pp.141~165 (1981)
- Goldberg, L. R., "An alternative"description of personality" : The big five structure", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), pp.1216~1229 (1990)[DOI]
- Goldberg, L. R., "The structure of phenotypic personality traits", American Psychologist, 48(1), pp.26~34 (1993)
- Golden, J. P., "The Golden Personality Type Profiler technical manual" (1999), Organizational Renewal Associates, Inc
- Golden J. P., "GOLDEN 성격유형검사 전문가 지침서" (2022), 인싸이트 심리검사연구소
- Golden, J. P., "Golden Personality Type Profiler technical manual" (2005), NCS Pearson
- Harvey R. J., "A “Big Five” Scoring System for the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator", Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (1995)
- Hough, L. M., "Individual difference and behavior in organization" (1996), Jossey-Bass
- Hu, L. T., "Cutoffcriteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives", Structural Equation Modeling : A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), pp.1~55 (1999)[DOI]
- Jung, C. G., "Psychological types" (1971), Princeton University Press
- Kline, R. B., "Principles and practice of structural equation modeling" (2015), Guilford publications
- Landis, J. R., "The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data", Biometrics, 33(1), pp.159~174 (1977)[DOI]
- Luis M. Lozano, "Effect of the Number of Response Categories on the Reliability and Validity of Rating Scales", Methodology, 4(2), pp.73~79 (2008), Hogrefe Publishing Group[DOI]
- Douglas A. MacDonald, "Examination of the Relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the Neo Personality Inventory", Psychological Reports, 74(1), pp.339~344 (1994), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- MacDonald D. A., "Correlations Between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the NEO Personality Inventory Facets", Psychological Reports, 76(2), pp.449~ (1995)[DOI]
- "6 tools for busy HR professionals" (2021)[URL]
- Robert R. McCrae, "Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator From the Perspective of the Five-Factor Model of Personality", Journal of Personality, 57(1), pp.17~40 (1989), Wiley[DOI]
- "Understanding personality with Dr. John Golden: Growing as grown-ups" (2021)[URL]
- "Bayesian analysis in Mplus: A brief introduction" (2010)[URL]
- Myers, I. B., "Gifts differing" (1980), Consulting Psychologists Press
- Norem, Julie K., "걱정 많은 사람들이 잘되는 이유" (2015), 한국경제신문
- Warren T. Norman, "Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings.", The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(6), pp.574~583 (1963), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
- Norman, W. T., "Raters, ratees, and randomness in personality structure", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(6), pp.681~691 (1966)[DOI]
- Nunnally, J. C., "Psychometric theory" (1978), McGraw-Hill
- Ory, J. C., "Attitude change measured by scales with 4 and 5 response options", Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education Chicago (1981)
- Sampo V. Paunonen, "Big Five factors of personality and replicated predictions of behavior.", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), pp.411~424 (2003), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
- "Articles on MBTI applications & Personality Types" (2021)[URL]
- Carolyn C Preston, "Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences", Acta Psychologica, 104(1), pp.1~15 (2000), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Beatrice Rammstedt, "Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German", Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), pp.203~212 (2007), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings, "Tupes, E. C.", U.S. Air Force, ~, pp.USAF ASD Tech. Rep. No. 61-97 (1961)
- Wagnerova, I., "Golden Profiler of Personality", E-psychologie, 5(1), pp.83~86 (2011)
- Wagnerova, I., "Golden Profiler of Personality", Psychologie Pro Praxi, 1(2), pp.77~82 (2013)
- Li-Jen Weng, "Impact of the Number of Response Categories and Anchor Labels on Coefficient Alpha and Test-Retest Reliability", Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(6), pp.956~972 (2004), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- Wiggins, J. S., "Paradigms of personality assessment" (2003), Guilford Press