2000년대 가부장적 가족 서사의 구조적 재인식: 김숨과 김이설의 작품들
Structual Reunderstanding of the Patriarchal Family Narrrative in 2000
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the 2000s, the pathriarchy of Korean novels were either absent or haunted by the faliure of the Middle-class fantasy. Abolished by patriarchal families, daughters seek to overcome their irrational acts by faithfully reproducing their unreasonable violence against the helpless father. However, there were few worries that only a formality to sensationalize and highlight the perpetrators and the role of the vicitims, Various attempts have been made-such as to present a new family model or emphasize the identity of a daughter who has been liberated from the patriarchal family. But such attempts could not escape criticism of the designs of utopia-designed to be less feasible. The implication of the term “Stereotypical” in literature underestimates the irrationality of the patriarchy. But the faithful reproduction of facts enables the discovery of a literary reality, enabling real aquires to be persuasive. “Dogfight” and who abandoned by a capitalism society after being exploited in “Fools”. But Kim Sum isn't only suggest, makes them absence as physical or psychological, and then exposes to the real structure of the patriarchy family, which believed that they belived they were preserved. The absence of father, daughters couldn't being liberated, they recognize that they were found to have been involved in their own identities and complacency. The structure can be retained permanently through the replacement of roles. Even after the death of a violent patriarchal family, the patriarchal structure remains to be follwed by the next offender and the victim. such as the “Holes”. Kim ei-seul declares the attempts to discommon the inner circle of patriarchisms that demand mental rewards for householders and describe their attempts to make or break a family, and describe an alternative family of families in “Cold wave warning”. These attempts end up in momentary peace or failure, but they refuse to accept Compassion narrative for the patriarchs and sever emotional ties with them. Such a break will preoccupy the unilateral biases of the Compassion narrative. Kim ei-seul declares the Compassion narrative, and unburdes the sympathic reward which the Compassion narrative's goal-and then unburdes against that Compassion narrative with no commonsense or sympathy. The sympathical violence which performed pathriarchs reveal the contradictions between their impotence and patriarchal structure. The emotional relationship between family members has been severed, and only structures remain. The novel is the attempt to represent the unpossible things. The authors represent to discover the reality which in the facts. In these words, Kim Sum and Kim ei-seul's attempts is offered the re-cognition as the represent the Stereotypical facts in Patriarchy narrative.
Abstract
In the 2000s, the pathriarchy of Korean novels were either absent or haunted by the faliure of the Middle-class fantasy. Abolished by patriarchal families, daughters seek to overcome their irrational acts by faithfully reproducing their unreasonable violence against the helpless father. However, there were few worries that only a formality to sensationalize and highlight the perpetrators and the role of the vicitims, Various attempts have been made-such as to present a new family model or emphasize the identity of a daughter who has been liberated from the patriarchal family. But such attempts could not escape criticism of the designs of utopia-designed to be less feasible. The implication of the term “Stereotypical” in literature underestimates the irrationality of the patriarchy. But the faithful reproduction of facts enables the discovery of a literary reality, enabling real aquires to be persuasive. “Dogfight” and who abandoned by a capitalism society after being exploited in “Fools”. But Kim Sum isn't only suggest, makes them absence as physical or psychological, and then exposes to the real structure of the patriarchy family, which believed that they belived they were preserved. The absence of father, daughters couldn't being liberated, they recognize that they were found to have been involved in their own identities and complacency. The structure can be retained permanently through the replacement of roles. Even after the death of a violent patriarchal family, the patriarchal structure remains to be follwed by the next offender and the victim. such as the “Holes”. Kim ei-seul declares the attempts to discommon the inner circle of patriarchisms that demand mental rewards for householders and describe their attempts to make or break a family, and describe an alternative family of families in “Cold wave warning”. These attempts end up in momentary peace or failure, but they refuse to accept Compassion narrative for the patriarchs and sever emotional ties with them. Such a break will preoccupy the unilateral biases of the Compassion narrative. Kim ei-seul declares the Compassion narrative, and unburdes the sympathic reward which the Compassion narrative's goal-and then unburdes against that Compassion narrative with no commonsense or sympathy. The sympathical violence which performed pathriarchs reveal the contradictions between their impotence and patriarchal structure. The emotional relationship between family members has been severed, and only structures remain. The novel is the attempt to represent the unpossible things. The authors represent to discover the reality which in the facts. In these words, Kim Sum and Kim ei-seul's attempts is offered the re-cognition as the represent the Stereotypical facts in Patriarchy narrative.
참고문헌 (33)
- 김숨, "투견", pp.10~33 (2005), 문학동네
- 김숨, "침대" (2007), 문학과 지성사
- 김숨, "간과 쓸개" (2011), 문학과 지성사
- 김숨, "국수" (2014), 창비
- 김숨, "바느질하는 여자" (2015), 문학과 지성사
- 김숨, "백치들", pp.41~181 (2006), 랜덤하우스중앙
- 김이설, "나쁜 피", pp.37~170 (2009), 민음사
- 김이설, "아무도 말하지 않는 것들" (2010), 문학과 지성사
- 김이설, "환영" (2011), 자음과 모음
- 김이설, "오늘처럼 고요히", pp.140~171 (2016), 문학동네
- 김미현, "한국어문학여성주제어 사전 1"
- 김미현, "한국어문학여성주제어 사전 2"
- 김미현, "한국어문학여성주제어 사전 4" (2013)
- 김나영, "현실과 소설의 현실 : 김이설 장편소설 『환영』", pp.346~348 (2011)
- 김양선, "허스토리의 문학", pp.140~ (2003), 새미
- 시간이 얼마 남지 않았다, "작가세계", 2014, 73~
- 김주연, "자연주의를 넘어서-우화: 김숨론", 문학과 사회, 25(2), pp.204~219 (2012), 문학과지성사
- 김형중, "유토피아 모텔에서 뒤돌아서다(김이설론)", 문학과 사회, 23(2), pp.338~352 (2010), 문학과지성사
- 김형중, "아버지, 제가 불타고 있는 것이 안 보이세요? (윤성희론)", 문학과 사회, 24(4), pp.304~ (2011), 문학과 지성사
- 박진, "포스트 IMF 시대, 문학의 욕망과 욕망의 윤리-김사과, 최진영, 황정은의 소설", 작가세계, (23) (2011)
- 배상미, "하층계급 여성들의 성노동과 ‘여성 억압’ : 김이설 소설을 중심으로", 실천문학, pp.98~110 (2015), 실천문학사
- 임나리, "김이설 인터뷰 : 행복하고 화목한 가족, 저만 불편한가요?", 채널예스, ~ (2016)
- 서은경, "‘사실’소설의 등장과 근대소설로의 이행 과정 -1910년대 유학생 소설을 중심으로", 한국문학이론과 비평, 14(2), pp.285~310 (2010), 한국문학이론과비평학회
- 모형 카나리아의 울음 : 김숨론, "오늘의 문예비평", 2008, ~
- 심진경, "여성 폭력의 젠더정치학", 젠더와 문화, 4(2), pp.109~131 (2011), 여성학연구소
- 신수정, "1970∼1980년대 한국 근대화 프로젝트와 중동 건설 노동자 가족의 에토스 -박완서 소설에 나타나는 공모와 균열의 양상을 중심으로-", 우리말글, 70, pp.339~368 (2016), 우리말글학회[DOI]
- Athena, Athanasiou, "박탈-정치적인 것에 있어서의 수행성에 관한 대화" (2016), 자음과 모음
- Butler, Judith, "젠더 트러블 : 페미니즘과 정체성의 전복" (2008), 문학동네
- Butler, Judith, "젠더 허물기" (2015), 문학과지성사
- Lentricchiam, Frank, "문학연구를 위한 비평 용어" (1994), 한신문화사
- Mies, Maria, "가부장제와 자본주의 : 여성, 자연, 식민지와 세계적 규모의 자본축적" (2014), 갈무리
- Walby, Sylvia, "가부장제 이론" (1996), 이화여자대학교
- W.J.T.미첼, "문학연구를 위한 비평용어", pp.1~13 (1994), 한신문화사
