‘참-진즛’과 ‘거즛’의 통시적 대립관계
A Correspondence of the ‘참-진즛’ and ‘거즛’
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper discussed the opposition relationship of the present words ‘참-진짜’ and ‘거짓-가짜’. In middle and modern age, these correspond ‘-진짓’ and ‘거즛’. The present words ‘참-진짜’ are corresponded ‘-진짓’ in middle and modern age. A similar form ‘짐짓’ is different from ‘진짓’. This words are different semantically. ‘진짓’ is corresponded Chinese character ‘眞’ and ‘짐짓’ is ‘故’. The present words ‘거짓-가짜’ are corresponded ‘거즛’ in middle and modern age. But the word which corresponds to ‘가짜’ uses ‘가딧>가짓’. ‘진짓, 가짓’ are originated with a modern age Chinese loan words ‘眞的’ and ‘假的’. ‘가짓’ did not continue in the form which becomes independent with ‘거즛>거짓’. This originates to these form as a matter of similarity. The form similarity occures to meaning integration. ‘眞的’과 ‘假的’ are correspond ‘진짓것’과 ‘거즛것’. These are noun. Consequently the present language ‘진짜, 가짜’ in compliance with reverse explaining of Chinese character ‘眞的者, 假的者’ or ‘眞者, 假者’. Consequently the correspondence of ‘참-진짜’ and ‘거짓-가짜’ come true with ‘참-진짓’ and ‘거즛-가짓’. The present language ‘참-진짜’ are same as adverb use. And ‘참’ is free from noun and prefix usuage. But ‘진짜’ is free from noun and prenoun usuage. ‘거짓-가짜’ is nearer than ‘참-진짜’ on the integrated degree. This related to form integration.
Abstract
This paper discussed the opposition relationship of the present words ‘참-진짜’ and ‘거짓-가짜’. In middle and modern age, these correspond ‘-진짓’ and ‘거즛’. The present words ‘참-진짜’ are corresponded ‘-진짓’ in middle and modern age. A similar form ‘짐짓’ is different from ‘진짓’. This words are different semantically. ‘진짓’ is corresponded Chinese character ‘眞’ and ‘짐짓’ is ‘故’. The present words ‘거짓-가짜’ are corresponded ‘거즛’ in middle and modern age. But the word which corresponds to ‘가짜’ uses ‘가딧>가짓’. ‘진짓, 가짓’ are originated with a modern age Chinese loan words ‘眞的’ and ‘假的’. ‘가짓’ did not continue in the form which becomes independent with ‘거즛>거짓’. This originates to these form as a matter of similarity. The form similarity occures to meaning integration. ‘眞的’과 ‘假的’ are correspond ‘진짓것’과 ‘거즛것’. These are noun. Consequently the present language ‘진짜, 가짜’ in compliance with reverse explaining of Chinese character ‘眞的者, 假的者’ or ‘眞者, 假者’. Consequently the correspondence of ‘참-진짜’ and ‘거짓-가짜’ come true with ‘참-진짓’ and ‘거즛-가짓’. The present language ‘참-진짜’ are same as adverb use. And ‘참’ is free from noun and prefix usuage. But ‘진짜’ is free from noun and prenoun usuage. ‘거짓-가짜’ is nearer than ‘참-진짜’ on the integrated degree. This related to form integration.
참고문헌 (32)
- 강우원, "담화표지 ‘참’과 어찌말 ‘참’의 비교 연구", 언어과학, 7(1), pp.5~26 (2000)
- 고영근, "표준중세국어문법론" (1991), 탑출판사
- 고영근, "중세국어의 시상과 서법. 보정판" (1998), 탑출판사
- 국립국어원, "표준국어대사전" (1999), 두산동아
- 현대국어 사용빈도조사, "국립국어원", ~ (2002)
- 김광해, "국어 어휘론 개설" (1993), 집문당
- 김종택, "국어어휘론" (1992), 탑출판사
- 남광우, "고어사전" (1981), 일조각
- 우리말 말수 사용의 잦기 조사, "문교부", ~ (1956)
- 민현식, "중세국어 성상부사연구 III", 국어교육, 77, pp.37~114 (1992)
- 박병채, "논주 월인천강지곡 상" (1988), 정음사
- 손남익, "국어 부사어와 공기어 제약", 한국어학, 9, pp.157~179 (1999)
- 양영희, "15세기국어 ‘ㅎ라’체 의문문의 격식성과 비격식성", 언어과학, 14(3), pp.93~114 (2007), 한국언어과학회
- 유창돈, "이조국어사연구" (1974), 선명문화사
- 유창돈, "어휘사 연구" (1980), 이우출판사
- 유창돈, "이조어 사전" (1985), 연세대출판부
- 이광호, "중세국어문법론" (1994), 학연사
- 이광호, "국어 어휘 의미론" (2004), 도서출판 월인
- 이광호, "어휘와 의미" (2008), 제이엔씨
- 이기문, "근세중국어 차용어에 대하여", 아세아연구, 8(2), pp.193~204 (1965)
- 이기문, "국어 어휘사 연구" (1991), 동아출판사
- 이기문, "신정판 국어사 개설" (2002), 태학사
- 임홍빈, "국어문법론 I" (1996), 한국방송통신대학교
- 장삼식, "대한한사전" (1985), 삼영출판사
- 전재호, "국어어휘사연구" (1987), 경북대출판부
- 허웅, "용비어천가" (1982), 형설출판사
- 홍사만, "국어어휘의미연구" (1983), 학문사
- 홍사만, "국어 정도 부사의 하위분류", 어문론총, 36, pp.31~74 (2002)
- 홍사만, "국어 의미 분석론" (2007), 한국문화사
- 홍윤표, "17세기 국어사전" (1995), 태학사
- 常務印書館編輯部, "辭源" (1987), 中華常務聯合印刷有限公司
- 諸橋轍次, "大漢和辭典" (1985), 大修館書店
