본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Assessment Battery for Communication — ABaCo: A new Instrument for the Evaluation of Pragmatic Abilities

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The Assessment Battery for Communication (ABaCo) is a new clinical instrument for the evaluation of communicative abilities in patients with neuropsychological and psychiatric disorders, such as aphasia, right hemispheric damage, closed head injury, autism and schizophrenia. ABaCo consists of 5 scales, investigating comprehension and production of linguistic and extralinguistic acts, paralinguistic expressions, appropriateness with respect to discourse and social norms, and management of conversation. Validity measures (content and construct validity) and reliability measures (inter-rater reliability and internal consistency) were computed. The experts’ content validity evaluations indicate an excellent match between test items and the measurement of pragmatic abilities, as well as the suitability of the battery for both children and adults. Regarding the other psychometric measures, computed on 390 normal children in different age groups, factor analysis shows the validity of the underlying theoretical construct. Reliability analyses show a high inter-rater agreement, suggesting that the battery can be administered and scored by any trained judge, and a good internal consistency, suggesting that the various items that make up each scale are coherent and contribute to the measurement of communicative abilities.

Abstract

The Assessment Battery for Communication (ABaCo) is a new clinical instrument for the evaluation of communicative abilities in patients with neuropsychological and psychiatric disorders, such as aphasia, right hemispheric damage, closed head injury, autism and schizophrenia. ABaCo consists of 5 scales, investigating comprehension and production of linguistic and extralinguistic acts, paralinguistic expressions, appropriateness with respect to discourse and social norms, and management of conversation. Validity measures (content and construct validity) and reliability measures (inter-rater reliability and internal consistency) were computed. The experts’ content validity evaluations indicate an excellent match between test items and the measurement of pragmatic abilities, as well as the suitability of the battery for both children and adults. Regarding the other psychometric measures, computed on 390 normal children in different age groups, factor analysis shows the validity of the underlying theoretical construct. Reliability analyses show a high inter-rater agreement, suggesting that the battery can be administered and scored by any trained judge, and a good internal consistency, suggesting that the various items that make up each scale are coherent and contribute to the measurement of communicative abilities.

참고문헌 (68)

  1. Airenti, G, , Conversation and behavior games in the pragmatics of dialogue. Cognitive Science, 17, pp.197~256 (1993)
  2. Airenti, G, "Failures", exploitations and deceits in communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 20, pp.303~326 (1993)
  3. Angeleri, R, , Communicative impairment in traumatic brain injury: A complete pragmatic assessment. Brain and Language, 107, pp.229~245 (2008)
  4. Austin, J.L, "How to Do Things with Words" (1962), Clarendon Press
  5. Bara, B, , Communicative abilities in autism: Evidence for attentional deficits. Brain and Language, 77, pp.216~240 (2001)
  6. Bara, B.G, "Cognitive Pragmatics. Cambridge" (2008), MIT Press
  7. Bara, B.G, "Developmental pragmatics in normal and abnormal children", Brain and Language, 68, pp.507~528 (1999)
  8. Bara, B.G, "Simple and complex speech acts: What makes the difference within a developmental perspective. In Proceedings of the XXI Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society", Mahwah, pp.55~60 (1999), What makes the difference within a developmental perspective.In Proceedings of the XXI Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society,M.Hahn & S.C.Stoness,Mahwah,NJ,pp.55-60.
  9. Bara, B.G, , Development and decay of extra-linguistic communication. Brain and Cognition, 43, pp.21~27 (2000)
  10. Bara, B.G, , Neuropragmatics: Extralinguistic communication after closed head injury. Brain and Language, 77, pp.72~94 (2001)
  11. Bara, B.G, , A mentalist framework for linguistic and extralinguistic communication. In Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Cognitive Science, pp.285~29 (1999), 285-29
  12. Bara, B.G, , Neuropragmatics: Brain and communication. Brain and Language, 71, pp.10~14 (2000)
  13. Bara, B.G, , Neuropragmatics: Neuropsychological constraints on formal theories of dialogue. Brain and Language, 59, pp.7~49 (1997)
  14. Becchio, B, "How brain understands intention. Different neural circuits identify the componential features of motor and prior intention", Consciousness and Cognition, 15, pp.64~74 (2006)
  15. Bishop, D.V.M, , Development of the children’s communication checklist (CCC): A method for assessing qualitative aspects of communicative impairment in children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, pp.879~891 (1998)
  16. Bosco F.M, , Simple and Complex Deceits and Ironies. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, pp.583~607 (2008)
  17. Bosco, F.M, , Context categories in understanding communicative intentions. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, pp.436~488 (2004)
  18. Bosco F.M, "Recognition and recovery of communicative failures: a developmental perspective.", Journal of Pragmatics, 38, pp.1398~1429 (2006)
  19. Brown G, "Discourse Analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Cambridge" (1983), UK: Cambridge University Press
  20. Bryan,K, "The right hemisphere language battery. London: Whurr", ~ (1995)
  21. Bucciarelli, M, , How children comprehend speech acts and communicative gestures. Journal of Pragmatics, 2, pp.207~241 (2003)
  22. Carlomagno, S, "Pragmatic approaches to aphasia therapy. London: Whurr", ~ (1994)
  23. Carlomagno, S, , The role of communication models in assessment and therapy of language disorders in aphasic adults. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 10, pp.337~363 (2000)
  24. Cohen, J, "A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20", Measurement, 37~46 (1960)
  25. Clark, H.H, "Using language. Cambridge" (1996), UK: Cambridge University Press
  26. Clark, H.H, , Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, pp.1~39 (1986)
  27. Cohen, M, , Neurodevelopmental differences in emotional prosody in normal children and children with left and right temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain and Language, 38, pp.122~134 (1990)
  28. Cronbach, L.J, "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests", Psychometrika, 16, pp.297~334 (1951)
  29. Cutica, I, , Neuropsychological evidence for linguistic and extralinguistic paths in communication. In Proceedings of the XXVII International Conference of Cognitive Science (2005)
  30. Cutica, I, "Neuropragmatics: Extralinguistic pragmatic ability is better preserved in left-hemisphere-damaged patients than in right-hemisphere-damaged patients", Brain and Language, 98, pp.12~25 (2006)
  31. Davis, G.A, "Adult aphasia rehabilitation: Applied pragmatics. Windsor", UK: NFER-Nelson (1985)
  32. De Vellis, R.F, "Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Sacco K", CA: Sage (1991)
  33. Emmorey, K, , Neural system underlying lexical retrieval for sign language. Neuropsychologia, 41, pp.85~95 (2003)
  34. Frattali, C.M, "American speech-language hearing association functional assessment of communication skills for adults. Rockville", MD: ASHA Fulfillment Operations (1995)
  35. Gardner, H, "Right hemisphere communication battery. Boston: Psychology Service", VAMC (1986)
  36. Gibbs, R.W, "The poetics of mind: Figurative though, language, and understanding. Cambridge" (1994), UK: Cambridge University Press
  37. Grice, H.P, "Logic and Conversation", pp.41~58 (1975), Academic Press
  38. Grice, H.P, "Studies in the ways of words" (1989), Harvard University Press.
  39. Hartley, L.L, "Narrative and procedural discourse after closed head injury", Brain Injury, 5, pp.267~285 (1991)
  40. Hickok, G, , The neurobiology of sign language and its implications for the neural basis of language. Nature, 381, pp.699~670 (1996)
  41. Hinde R.A, "Non-verbal Communication.Cambridge" (1972), UK: Cambridge University Press
  42. Holland, A.L, "Communicative abilities in daily living" (1980), University Park Press
  43. Holland, A.L, "Communication activities of daily living (CADL-2). Austin", TX: Pro-Editor (1998)
  44. Hough, M.S, "Narrative comprehension in adults with right and left hemisphere brain-damage: Theme organization", Brain and Language, 38, pp.253~277 (1990)
  45. Kasher, A, "Minimal speakers and necessary speech acts", The Hague: Mouton, pp.93~101 (1981), Mouton.
  46. Landis, J.R, , The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorial Data. Biometrics, 33, pp.159~174 (1977)
  47. Letts, C, "Comprehension of inferential meaning in language-impaired and language normal children", International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 36, pp.307~328 (2001)
  48. Likert, R, , Techinque for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Pschology, 140, pp.1~55 (1932)
  49. McDonald, S, , Pragmatic language loss following closed head injury: Inability to meet the informational needs of the listener. Brain and Language, 44, pp.28~46 (1993)
  50. Noveck, I.A, , When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicature. Cognition, 78, pp.165~188 (2001)
  51. Nunnaly, J, "Psychometric theory", McGraw-Hill (1978)
  52. Penn, C, , Pragmatic assessment and therapy for persons with brain damage: What have clinicians gleaned in two decades Brain and Language, 68, pp.535~552 (1999)
  53. Penn, C, "The profile of communicative appropriateness: A clinical tool for the assessment of pragmatics", South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 32, pp.18~23 (1985)
  54. Pickering M, "Toward a Mechanistic Psychology of Dialogue: Behavioral and Brain Sciences", Sciences, 27, pp.169~226 (2003)
  55. Prutting, C.A, , Pragmatics as social competence. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, pp.123~134 (1982)
  56. Prutting, C.A, "A clinical appraisal of the pragmatic aspects of language", Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, pp.105~119 (1987)
  57. Rinaldi, M.C, , Metaphor comprehension in right brain-damaged patients with visuo-verbal and verbal material: a dissociation (re)considered. Cortex, 40, pp.479~490 (2004)
  58. Sacks, H, "A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation", pp.7~55 (1978), Academic Press
  59. Sarno, M.T, "The functional communication profile. New York: Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine", NYU Medical Center (1969)
  60. Searle, J.R, "Speech acts" (1969), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  61. Spector, C.C, "Children’s comprehension of idioms in the context of humor. Language, Speech", Hearing Services in Schools, 27, pp.307~313 (1996)
  62. Surian, L, , Are children with autism deaf to Gricean maxims Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 1, pp.55~71 (1996)
  63. Tager-Flusberg, H., "Understanding other minds. Perspective from development cognitive neuroscience", pp.124~149 (2000), University Press
  64. Tirassa, M, , mind, 1999, pp.68, 419~441
  65. Walter, H, "Understanding intentions in social interactions: The role of the anterior paracingulate cortex", Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, pp.1854~1863 (2004)
  66. Winner, E, "Distinguishing lies from jokes: Theory of mind deficits and discourse interpretation in right hemisphere brain-damaged patients", Brain and Language, 62, pp.89~106 (1998)
  67. Zanini, S, "La batteria del linguaggio dell’emisfero destro — BaLED. EMS", Bologna (2003)
  68. Zanini, S, "Italian Right hemisphere language battery: the normative study", Neurological Science, 26, pp.13~25 (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

Theory of Mind Ability after a Traumatic Brain Injury: Evidence for the Existence of Distinct Functional ComponentsAlessandra Ruzzini, Gabriella Pravettoni, Ilaria Cutica, Marina Zettin, Silvia Riva, Valeria Manera인지과학연구소 · Journal of Cognitive Science2014 · 제15권 제2호Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version of the Clinical Language Disorder Rating Scale (CLANG)박선철, 이강욱, 이정구, 이화영, 장은영, 최준호대한정신약물학회 · Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience2016 · 제14권 제1호Higher Order Cognition and Communication: A Preliminary Study for the Development of Brief Test of Cognitive-Communication Disorders김보선, 이미숙한국청각언어재활학회 · Audiology and Speech Research2020 · 제16권 제3호A Relationship between Theory of Mind and Pragmatic Language in Adolescents with Mild Intellectual Disabilities김화수, 천정민한국청각언어재활학회 · Audiology and Speech Research2021 · 제17권 제1호Aberrant Neural Activation Underlying Idiom Comprehension in Korean Children with High Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder김남욱, 송동호, 송승하, 이슬비, 천근아, 최욱수, 하성지연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2018 · 제59권 제7호A Preliminary Study for the Development of Informant-Report Scale on Cognitive-Linguistic Abilities of the Elderly: Focused on Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer’s Disease김보선, 이미숙한국청각언어재활학회 · Audiology and Speech Research2020 · 제16권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)