상업용부동산 재개발에 있어 세입자보상 관련 권리금 결정요인에 관한 연구

Abstract

This study analyzes a comparative significance of location, facility and business factors in the decision of foregift using AHP technique. Findings reveal that location factor was the most significant and business factor was more important than the facility factor. Site and floating population showed highly significant in the location factor. In detailed item analysis, items such as '1st floor', 'availability of parking lot', 'the distance of subway station' represented high degree of significance. This outcome indicates that easy access to shopping area tends to increase sales or operating profit to sales ratio. Thus, accessibility to shopping area is evaluated the most significantly. In the facility factor, serving installation including table, heating and cooling facilities were highly evaluated. This means that convenience of customers and service related facilities were evaluated significantly. In the business factor, credit ratings and business know-how were evaluated almost equivalent degree. The case of credit ratings, whether it is same line of business or not, whether it is chain business or not, and whether the business period is longer or not produced a similar outcome. This means that diverse factors are considered in evaluating credit ratings, as a capacity of payment. In the case of business know-how, analysis showed the order of 'secret method of production'>'differentiated service'. This implies that clients regard quality of the production the most important and then customer service. One must restrict the foregift which is an object of compensation to the foregift produced by business factors. Whether the foregift is paid or not must be substantiated by legalization, thus this is a matter of national lawmaking policy.