Effectiveness of Arch Support Taping is Subjects With Excessive Foot Pronation: A Meta-analysis
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: An excessive pronated foot is defined as a flattening or complete loss of the medial longitudinal arch. Excessive foot pronation is considered to have high risk factors of overuse injuries in the lower limb. Various treatments have been investigated in attempts to control excessive pronation. Objects: This meta-analysis identifies the effects of an anti-pronation taping technique using different materials. Methods: The electronic databases used include MEDLINE, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Science Direct, the Korean Studies Information Service System (KISS), the Research Information Sharing Service (RISS), the Korea National Library, and the Korean Medical Database (studies published up to July 31, 2019). The database search used the following keywords: "foot drop" OR "foot arch" OR "foot pronation" OR "flat foot (pes planus)" AND "taping" OR "support." Eight eligible studies were analyzed to determine the effectiveness of anti-pronation taping in study and control groups. Results: The overall random effect size (Hedges’ g) of the anti-pronation taping technique was 0.147 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -.214 to .509). When the effect (Hedges’ g) was compared by the type of tape material, rigid tape (RT; Lowdye taping) was .213 (95% CI: -.278 to .704) and kinesiotape (KT; arch support taping) was -.014 (95% CI: -.270 to .242). Based on this meta-analysis, it was not possible to identify the extent to which anti-pronation taping was effective in preventing navicular drop, improving balance, or changing foot pressure. Only three of the eight eligible studies applied KT on excessive pronated feet, and the outcome measure areas were different to those of the RT studies. The KT studies used EMG data, overall foot posture index (FPI) scores, and rear foot FPI scores. In contrast, the RT studies measured navicular heights, various foot angles, and foot pressure. Conclusion: This review could not find any conclusive evidence about the effectiveness of any taping method for patients with pronated feet. Future studies are needed to develop the anti-pronation taping technique based on the clinical scientific evidence.
Abstract
Background: An excessive pronated foot is defined as a flattening or complete loss of the medial longitudinal arch. Excessive foot pronation is considered to have high risk factors of overuse injuries in the lower limb. Various treatments have been investigated in attempts to control excessive pronation. Objects: This meta-analysis identifies the effects of an anti-pronation taping technique using different materials. Methods: The electronic databases used include MEDLINE, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Science Direct, the Korean Studies Information Service System (KISS), the Research Information Sharing Service (RISS), the Korea National Library, and the Korean Medical Database (studies published up to July 31, 2019). The database search used the following keywords: "foot drop" OR "foot arch" OR "foot pronation" OR "flat foot (pes planus)" AND "taping" OR "support." Eight eligible studies were analyzed to determine the effectiveness of anti-pronation taping in study and control groups. Results: The overall random effect size (Hedges’ g) of the anti-pronation taping technique was 0.147 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -.214 to .509). When the effect (Hedges’ g) was compared by the type of tape material, rigid tape (RT; Lowdye taping) was .213 (95% CI: -.278 to .704) and kinesiotape (KT; arch support taping) was -.014 (95% CI: -.270 to .242). Based on this meta-analysis, it was not possible to identify the extent to which anti-pronation taping was effective in preventing navicular drop, improving balance, or changing foot pressure. Only three of the eight eligible studies applied KT on excessive pronated feet, and the outcome measure areas were different to those of the RT studies. The KT studies used EMG data, overall foot posture index (FPI) scores, and rear foot FPI scores. In contrast, the RT studies measured navicular heights, various foot angles, and foot pressure. Conclusion: This review could not find any conclusive evidence about the effectiveness of any taping method for patients with pronated feet. Future studies are needed to develop the anti-pronation taping technique based on the clinical scientific evidence.
참고문헌 (25)
- Cheung RTH, "A systematic review of running shoes and lower leg biomechanics: a possible link with patellofemoral pain syndrome?", Int Sport Med J, 8, pp.107~116 (2007)
- Cheung RT, "Influence of different footwear on force of landing during running", Phys Ther, 88, pp.620~628 (2008)
- R. T. H. Cheung, "Efficacies of different external controls for excessive foot pronation: a meta-analysis", British Journal of Sports Medicine, 45(9), pp.743~751 (2011), BMJ[DOI]
- 최영준, "단축발 운동과 로우다이 테이핑이 편평발 성인의 발의 정렬, 발바닥압력 및 정적균형에 미치는 영향", 한국리듬운동학회지, 11(2), pp.71~80 (2018), 한국리듬운동학회[DOI]
- Cooper H, "The Handbook of Research Synthesis", pp.301~322 (1994), Russell Sage Foundation
- Dahle LK, "Visual assessment of foot type and relationship of foot type to lower extremity injury", J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 14(2), pp.70~74 (1991)
- 엄주리, "유연성 평발에 적용한 로우다이 테이핑에 의한 균형 수행력의 변화", 대한물리의학회지, 9(4), pp.355~361 (2014), 대한물리의학회
- Melinda M. Franettovich, "A comparison of augmented low-Dye taping and ankle bracing on lower limb muscle activity during walking in adults with flat-arched foot posture", Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 15(1), pp.8~13 (2012), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- 김태호, "6주간의 활지지 테이핑(arch support taping) 적용이 과도하게 엎침된 발의 발바닥압력과 발배뼈 높이에 미치는 영향", 대한물리의학회지, 6(4), pp.483~490 (2011), 대한물리의학회
- Sachini N.K. Kodithuwakku Arachchige, "Flatfeet: Biomechanical implications, assessment and management", The Foot, 38, pp.81~85 (2019), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- 이소정, "Effect of Taping Therapy and Inner Arch Support on Plantar Lower Body Alignment and Gait", 한국운동역학회지, 27(3), pp.229~238 (2017), 한국운동역학회
- Lephart SM, "The role of proprioception in the treatment of sports injuries", Sports Exerc Inj, 1, pp.96~102 (1995)
- Pazit Levinger, "A comparison of foot kinematics in people with normal- and flat-arched feet using the Oxford Foot Model", Gait & Posture, 32(4), pp.519~523 (2010), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Alejandro Luque-Suarez, "Effects of kinesiotaping on foot posture in participants with pronated foot: A quasi-randomised, double-blind study", Physiotherapy, 100(1), pp.36~40 (2014), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Moen MH, "Medial tibial stress syndrome : A critical review", Sports Med, 39, pp.523~546 (2009)
- Tim Newell, "Arch-Taping Techniques for Altering Navicular Height and Plantar Pressures During Activity", Journal of Athletic Training, 50(8), pp.825~832 (2015), Journal of Athletic Training[DOI]
- Pita-Fernandez S, "Flat foot in a random population and its impact on quality of life and functionality", J Clin Diagn Res, 11(4), pp.LC22~LC27 (2017)[DOI]
- Powers CM, "Rearfoot posture in subjects with patellofemoral pain", J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 22(4), pp.155~160 (1995)
- Radford JA, "The effect of low-Dye taping on kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic variables : A systematic review", J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 36(4), pp.232~241 (2006)
- Thelen MD, "The clinical efficacy of kinesio tape for shoulder pain : A randomized, doubleblinded, clinical trial", J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 38(7), pp.389~395 (2008)
- Vicenzino B, "Effect of antipronation tape and temporary orthotic on vertical navicular height before and after exercise", J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 30(6), pp.333~339 (2000)
- Vicenzino B, "Plantar foot pressures after the augmented low dye taping technique", J Athl Train, 42(3), pp.374~380 (2007)
- Weist R, "The influence of muscle fatigue on electromyogram and plantar pressure patterns as an explanation for the incidence of metatarsal stress fractures", Am J Sports Med, 32, pp.1893~1898 (2004)
- Whitaker JM, "Effect of the low-Dye strap on pronation sensitive mechanical attributes of the foot", J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, 93, pp.118~123 (2003)
- Sean Williams, "Kinesio Taping in Treatment and Prevention of Sports Injuries", Sports Medicine, 42(2), pp.153~164 (2012), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]