본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparing the Immediate Effectiveness of Lumbar Flexion and Extension Exercise With Regards to Pain, Range of Motion, Pelvic Tilt, and Functional Gait Ability in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류물리치료학

초록

Background: In patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), lumbar flexion exercise (LFE) is considered a standard therapeutic exercise that widens the space between the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen. However, some researchers have reported that lumbar extension exercise (LEE) may improve lumbar pain and functional ability in patients with LSS. Although exercise intervention methods for patients with LSS have been widely applied in clinical settings, few studies have conducted comparative analysis of these exercise methods. Objects: This study aimed to compare the effects of LFE, LEE, and lumbar flexion combined with lumbar flexion-extension exercise (LFEE) on pain, range of motion (ROM), pelvic tilt angle, and functional gait ability in patients with LSS. Methods: A total of 30 patients with LSS, LFE (n1=10), LEE (n2=10), and LFEE (n3=10) were assigned to each of the three exercise groups. The numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), modified-modified schober test (MMST)-flexion, MMST-extension, pelvic tilt inclinometer, and 6-minute walking test (6MWT) were measured. Results: After the intervention, statistically significant differences were observed in the NPRS (p=.043), MMST-flexion (p<.001), MMST-extension (p<.001), and 6MWT (p=.005) between groups. According to the post hoc test, the NPRS was statistically significant difference between the LFEE and LEE groups (p=.034). The MMST-flexion was statistically significantly different between the LFE and LEE (p=.000), LFE and LFEE (p=.001), and LEE and LFEE (p=.001) groups. The MMST-extension was statistically significantly different between the LFE and LEE (p<.001), LFE and LFEE (p=.002), and LEE and LFEE (p=.008) groups. The 6MWT was statistically significantly different between the LFE and LFEE (p=.042) and the LEE and LFEE (p=.004) groups. Conclusion: This study suggested that LFEE was the most effective exercise for pain and functional gait ability in patients with LSS, LFE was the most effective exercise for lumbar flexion ROM, and LEE was the most effective exercise for lumbar extension ROM.

Abstract

Background: In patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), lumbar flexion exercise (LFE) is considered a standard therapeutic exercise that widens the space between the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen. However, some researchers have reported that lumbar extension exercise (LEE) may improve lumbar pain and functional ability in patients with LSS. Although exercise intervention methods for patients with LSS have been widely applied in clinical settings, few studies have conducted comparative analysis of these exercise methods. Objects: This study aimed to compare the effects of LFE, LEE, and lumbar flexion combined with lumbar flexion-extension exercise (LFEE) on pain, range of motion (ROM), pelvic tilt angle, and functional gait ability in patients with LSS. Methods: A total of 30 patients with LSS, LFE (n1=10), LEE (n2=10), and LFEE (n3=10) were assigned to each of the three exercise groups. The numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), modified-modified schober test (MMST)-flexion, MMST-extension, pelvic tilt inclinometer, and 6-minute walking test (6MWT) were measured. Results: After the intervention, statistically significant differences were observed in the NPRS (p=.043), MMST-flexion (p<.001), MMST-extension (p<.001), and 6MWT (p=.005) between groups. According to the post hoc test, the NPRS was statistically significant difference between the LFEE and LEE groups (p=.034). The MMST-flexion was statistically significantly different between the LFE and LEE (p=.000), LFE and LFEE (p=.001), and LEE and LFEE (p=.001) groups. The MMST-extension was statistically significantly different between the LFE and LEE (p<.001), LFE and LFEE (p=.002), and LEE and LFEE (p=.008) groups. The 6MWT was statistically significantly different between the LFE and LFEE (p=.042) and the LEE and LFEE (p=.004) groups. Conclusion: This study suggested that LFEE was the most effective exercise for pain and functional gait ability in patients with LSS, LFE was the most effective exercise for lumbar flexion ROM, and LEE was the most effective exercise for lumbar extension ROM.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. Ahmad Alghadir, "Test&ndash;retest reliability, validity, and minimum detectable change of visual analog, numerical rating, and verbal rating scales for measurement of osteoarthritic knee pain", Journal of Pain Research, Volume 11, pp.851~856 (2018), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  2. Atlas SJ, "Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis : four-year outcomes from the maine lumbar spine study", Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 25(5), pp.556~562 (2000)
  3. Battie MC, "Spinal flexibility and individual factors that influence it", Phys Ther, 67(5), pp.653~658 (1987)
  4. Binder DK, "Lumbar spinal stenosis", Semin Neurol, 22(2), pp.157~166 (2002)
  5. Richard W. Bohannon, "Minimal clinically important difference for change in 6‐minute walk test distance of adults with pathology: a systematic review", Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 23(2), pp.377~381 (2016), Wiley[DOI]
  6. Chaxiang Chen, "Does the effectiveness of core stability exercises correlate with the severity of spinal stenosis in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis?", Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 33(3), pp.631~634 (2017), Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences[DOI]
  7. Clare HA, "A systematic review of efficacy of McKenzie therapy for spinal pain", Aust J Physiother, 50(4), pp.209~216 (2004)
  8. Shrif Costandi, "Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Therapeutic Options Review", Pain Practice, 15(1), pp.68~81 (2015), Wiley[DOI]
  9. Creighton D, "Management of lumbar spinal stenosis through the use of translatoric manipulation and lumbar flexion exercises:A case series", J Manual Manip Ther, 14(1), pp.E1~E10 (2006)
  10. Robert Dobbs, "The validity of a clinical test for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis", Manual Therapy, 25, pp.27~34 (2016), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  11. Elnaggar IM, "Effects of spinal flexion and extension exercises on low-back pain and spinal mobility in chronic mechanical low-back pain patients", Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 16(8), pp.967~972 (1991)
  12. Fast A, "Low back disorders : conservative management", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 69(10), pp.880~891 (1988)
  13. Fritz JM, "Preliminary results of the use of a two-stage treadmill test as a clinical diagnostic tool in the differential diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis", J Spinal Disord, 10(5), pp.410~416 (1997)
  14. Ahmet Goren, "Efficacy of exercise and ultrasound in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective randomized controlled trial", Clinical Rehabilitation, 24(7), pp.623~631 (2010), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  15. Hammerich AS, "Lumbar spinal stenosis and exercise prescription", Top Geriatr Rehabil, 30(2), pp.108~116 (2014)
  16. Gen Inoue, "Surgical and nonsurgical treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis", European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 26(7), pp.695~704 (2016), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  17. Jiayao Jiang, "Multifidus Degeneration, A New Risk Factor for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Case–Control Study", World Neurosurgery, 99, pp.226~231 (2017), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  18. Katz JN, "Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis : Diagnostic value of the history and physical examination", Arthritis Rheum, 38(9), pp.1236~1241 (1995)
  19. Krebs EE, "Accuracy of the pain numeric rating scale as a screening test in primary care", J Gen Intern Med, 22(10), pp.1453~1458 (2007)
  20. D. Scott Kreiner, "An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (update)", The Spine Journal, 13(7), pp.734~743 (2013), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  21. Anna M. Lafian, "Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Older Adults", Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America, 44(3), pp.501~512 (2018), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  22. Wenzhi Mu, "Comparison of two types of exercises in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis", Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 34(4), pp.897~900 (2018), Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences[DOI]
  23. Nwuga G, "Relative therapeutic efficacy of the Williams and McKenzie protocols in back pain management", Physiother Pract, 1(2), pp.99~105 (1985)
  24. Onel D, "Lumbar spinal stenosis:Clinical", radiologic therapeutic evaluation in 145patients. Conservative treatment or surgical intervention?, 1993, pp.18(2), 291~298
  25. Rikli RE, "The reliability and validity of a 6-minute walk test as a measure of physical endurance in older adults", J Aging Phys Act, 6(4), pp.363~375 (1998)
  26. James Steele, "A Randomized Controlled Trial of Limited Range of Motion Lumbar Extension Exercise in Chronic Low Back Pain", Spine, 38(15), pp.1245~1252 (2013), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
  27. Hidekazu Suzuki, "Total Sagittal Spinal Alignment in Patients With Lumbar Canal Stenosis Accompanied by Intermittent Claudication", Spine, 35(9), pp.E344~E346 (2010), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
  28. Christy C. Tomkins-Lane, "Longitudinal construct validity and responsiveness of measures of walking capacity in individuals with lumbar spinal stenosis", The Spine Journal, 14(9), pp.1936~1943 (2014), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  29. Tousignant M, "The modified-modified Schober test for range of motion assessment of lumbar flexion in patients with low back pain : a study of criterion validity, intra-and inter-rater reliability and minimum metrically detectable change", Disabil Rehabil, 27(10), pp.553~559 (2005)
  30. Turner JA, "Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Attempted meta-analysis of the literature", Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 17(1), pp.1~8 (1992)
  31. Whitman JM, "A comparison between two physical therapy treatment programs for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis : A randomized clinical trial", Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 31(22), pp.2541~2549 (2006)
  32. Williams PC, "Examination and conservative treatment for disc lesions of the lower spine", Clin Orthop, 5, pp.28~40 (1955)
  33. Williams R, "Reliability of the modified-modified Schöber and double inclinometer methods for measuring lumbar flexion and extension", Phys Ther, 73(1), pp.33~44 (1993)
  34. Youdas JW, "Lumbar lordosis and pelvic inclination in adults with chronic low back pain", Phys Ther, 80(3), pp.261~275 (2000)
  35. Fabio Zaina, "Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis", Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 29(1), pp.CD010264~ (2016), Wiley[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

The Efficacy of Physical Therapy and Physical Therapy Plus Calcitonin in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal StenosisBanu Kuran, Figen Yilmaz, Fusun Sahin, Nurdan Kotevoglu연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2009 · 제50권 제5호Core Stabilization With the Lumbar Extension Exercise in Low Back Pain김대훈, 노동국, 유승현, 차영주한국전문물리치료학회 · 한국전문물리치료학회지2018 · 제25권 제4호허리둘레변화 감지의 실시간 되먹임을 통한 의도적인 복근수축이 요추관 협착증 환자의 골반경사와 기능적 능력 그리고 신경근 조절에 미치는 영향김창범, 성재현, 최종덕한국전문물리치료학회 · 한국전문물리치료학회지2018 · 제25권 제1호체간 안정화 운동과 고관절 운동이 만성 요통 환자의 허리가동범위, 통증, 장애정도에 미치는 영향박찬호, 양영식, 정용식대한정형도수물리치료학회 · 대한정형도수물리치료학회지2022 · 제28권 제2호Effect of Lumbar Stabilization and Dynamic Lumbar Strengthening Exercises in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain김하정, 최경효, Dae Ha Kim, Hye Jin Moon, Jung Hoo Kim, Kwang Hee Lee, Yoo Jung Choi, Young Ki Cho대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2013 · 제37권 제1호만성 요통 환자에서 척추 안정화 운동과 요추부 신전근 강화 운동의 효과구혜경, 김대환, 김주섭, 박준성, 이영정, 이재환, 이태임대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2008 · 제32권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)