본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Adults’ Online Processing of Scopally Ambiguous Sentences

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The current study aims to explore the scope assignment of universally quantified NPs and negation in Korean in terms of adult sentence processing. The study used two self-paced reading tasks to measure online reading times. In the first experiment Korean native speakers (n=44) were presented sentences containing negation and a universally quantified subject NP. In the second experiment another group of Korean native speakers (n=38) read sentences containing negation and a universally quantified object NP. The reading time analyses showed that Korean native speakers strongly preferred the surface scope interpretation to the inverse scope reading, irrespective of the two types of negation form (short form vs. long form) or syntactic position of quantified NPs (subject vs. object). In addition, the speakers started to integrate the inverse scope interpretation upon encountering the second operator in the sentence. Based on the results, we argue that interpretive preferences for scope are associated with an efficiency-based processor, which pursues to minimize the burden on working memory during processing routines.

Abstract

The current study aims to explore the scope assignment of universally quantified NPs and negation in Korean in terms of adult sentence processing. The study used two self-paced reading tasks to measure online reading times. In the first experiment Korean native speakers (n=44) were presented sentences containing negation and a universally quantified subject NP. In the second experiment another group of Korean native speakers (n=38) read sentences containing negation and a universally quantified object NP. The reading time analyses showed that Korean native speakers strongly preferred the surface scope interpretation to the inverse scope reading, irrespective of the two types of negation form (short form vs. long form) or syntactic position of quantified NPs (subject vs. object). In addition, the speakers started to integrate the inverse scope interpretation upon encountering the second operator in the sentence. Based on the results, we argue that interpretive preferences for scope are associated with an efficiency-based processor, which pursues to minimize the burden on working memory during processing routines.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Aaronson, D., "Performance Theories for Sentence Coding: Some Quantitative Evidence", Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 2, pp.56~70 (1976)
  2. Anderson, C., "Structure and Real-time Comprehension of Quantifier Scope Ambiguity", PhD, pp.2004
  3. Baek, J. Y., "The Interpretive Tract" (1998), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics
  4. Cho, C-H., "The Korean Language: Its Structure and Social Projection", pp.63~80 (1975), Center for Korean Studies: University of Hawaii at Manoa
  5. Ferreira, F., "Psycholinguistics, Formal Grammars, and Cognitive Science", The Linguistic Review, 22, pp.365~380 (2005)
  6. Ferreira, F, "The Independence of Syntactic Processing", Journal of Memory and Language, 25, pp.348~368 (1986)
  7. Filik, R., "Processing doubly quantified sentences : evidence from eye movements", Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, pp.953~959 (2004)
  8. Gibson, E, "The Need for Quantitative Methods in Syntax and Semantics Research", Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(-2), pp.88~124 (2013)
  9. Hagstrom, P., "Implications of Child Error for the Syntax of Negation in Korean", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 11, pp.211~242 (2002)
  10. Han, C. -H., "Verb-raising and Grammar Competition in Korean : Evidence from Negation and Quantifier Scope", Linguistic Inquiry, 38, pp.1~48 (2007)
  11. Just, M. A., "A Theory of Reading : From Eye Fixations to Comprehension", Psychological Review, 87, pp.329~354 (1980)
  12. Just, M. A., "Paradigms and Processes in Reading Comprehension", Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 111, pp.228~238 (1982)
  13. Kim, J-B, "Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics Vol. 8", pp.403~418 (2000), Dept. of Linguistics, Harvard University
  14. Kurtzman, H. S., "Resolution of Quantifier Scope Ambiguities", Cognition, 48, pp.243~279 (1993)
  15. Kwak, H-Y., "Scope Interpretation in First and Second Language Acquisition:Numeral Quantifiers and Negation", PhD, pp.2010
  16. Lee, M., "Processing, Pragmatics, and Scope in Korean and English", To Appear in the Proceedings of the 19th Japanese-Korean Linguistics Conference, pp.297~311 (2011)
  17. Lee, S., "Psycholinguistic Evidence for Inverse Scope in Korean", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45(4), pp.871~882 (2016)
  18. Loewen, G., "Negation in Korean : A Syntactic Analysis", In Proceedings of the 2007 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, pp.1~15 (2007)
  19. May, R., "The Grammar of Quantification", PhD, pp.1977
  20. May, R., "Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation" (1985), MIT Press
  21. O’Grady, W., "The Emergentist Program", Lingua, 118, pp.447~464 (2008)
  22. O’Grady, W., "Handbook of Second Language Acquisition", pp.69~88 (2009), Emerald Press
  23. 손근원, "Scope taking and the negative barrier", 언어연구, 23(4), pp.701~721 (2008), 한국현대언어학회
  24. Song, S-C., "On Interpreting the Scope of Negation in Korean", Language Research, 18(1), pp.197~215 (1982)
  25. Suh, J-H., "Harvard studies in Korean Linguistics Vol. 3", pp.527~536 (1989), Dept. of Linguistics, Harvard University
  26. Suh, J-H., "Scope Phenomena and Aspects of Korean Syntax", PhD, pp.1990

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)