본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A processing-based analysis on the observation of isomorphism

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

Since Musolino’s (1998) influential work, studies on children’s acquisition of scope interpretation have investigated children’s grammatical knowledge and processing mechanisms that derive the difference between children and adults in their interpretation of scopally ambiguous sentences. In the current work, we propose a processing-based account for the fundamental question of why children do not get some interpretations among alternative interpretations. Being inspired by the argument intervention in the acquisition of A-movement, proposed by Orfitelli (2012), we suggest that children’s parsing mechanism has difficulties in correctly filling the gap (i.e. the base position of the displaced element) with a scope bearing element that undergoes movement if there is another scope bearing element between the filler-gap dependency. We discuss how the current proposal can account for many observations reported in previous works. Furthermore, to show that such an argument intervention effect in the domain of scope acquisition is a matter of configuration, we conducted an experiment on Korean. Korean is a language where an object undergoes movement over negation, which is the argument intervention configuration. We found that Korean-speaking children show the argument intervention effect in learning scope interpretation. This result supports the idea that children’s interpretation of scopally ambiguous sentences is configurationally determined and the immature parser is susceptible to the argument intervention effect.

Abstract

Since Musolino’s (1998) influential work, studies on children’s acquisition of scope interpretation have investigated children’s grammatical knowledge and processing mechanisms that derive the difference between children and adults in their interpretation of scopally ambiguous sentences. In the current work, we propose a processing-based account for the fundamental question of why children do not get some interpretations among alternative interpretations. Being inspired by the argument intervention in the acquisition of A-movement, proposed by Orfitelli (2012), we suggest that children’s parsing mechanism has difficulties in correctly filling the gap (i.e. the base position of the displaced element) with a scope bearing element that undergoes movement if there is another scope bearing element between the filler-gap dependency. We discuss how the current proposal can account for many observations reported in previous works. Furthermore, to show that such an argument intervention effect in the domain of scope acquisition is a matter of configuration, we conducted an experiment on Korean. Korean is a language where an object undergoes movement over negation, which is the argument intervention configuration. We found that Korean-speaking children show the argument intervention effect in learning scope interpretation. This result supports the idea that children’s interpretation of scopally ambiguous sentences is configurationally determined and the immature parser is susceptible to the argument intervention effect.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. Aoun, Joseph, "Scope and constituency", Linguistic Inquiry, 20(2), pp.141~172 (1989)
  2. Bever, Thomas G., "Cognition and the development of language" (1970), John Wiley
  3. Beghelli, Filippo, "Ways of scope taking" (1997), Kluwer
  4. Crain, Stephen, "Investigations in Universal Grammar: A guide to research on the acquisition of syntax and semantics" (1998), MIT Press
  5. Frazier, Lyn, "Construal" (1996), MIT Press
  6. Frazier, Lyn, "The sausage machine : A new two-stage model of parsing", Cognition, 6, pp.291~325 (1978)
  7. Gualmini, Andrea, "The rise and fall of Isomorphism", Lingua, 118(8), pp.1158~1176 (2008)
  8. Han, Chung-hye, "V-raising and grammar competition in Korean : Evidence from negation and quantifier scope", Linguistic Inquiry, 38(1), pp.1~47 (2007)
  9. Hirsch, Christopher, "When seem means think: the role of the experiencer phrase in children’s comprehension of raising", Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America, pp.135~146 (2007), Cascadilla Press
  10. Horn, Laurence, "On the semantic properties of the logical operators in English", PhD, pp.1972
  11. Horn, Laurence R., "A natural history of negation" (1989), University of Chicago Press
  12. Hornstein, Norbert, "LF : The grammar of Logical Form from GB to minimalism" (1995), Blackwell
  13. Kennedy, Lynda, J., "Beyond the scope of acquisition: A novel perspective on the isomorphism effect from Broca’s aphasia", Language Acquisition, 26(2), pp.144~152 (2019)
  14. Kwak, Hye-Young, "Scope interpretation in first and second language acquisition : Numeral quantifiers and negation", PhD, pp.2010
  15. Lidz, Jeffrey, "The scope of children’s scope : Representation, parsing and learning", Glossa : A Journal of General Linguistics, 3(1), pp.1~14 (2018)
  16. Lidz, Jeffrey, "Children’s command of quantification", Cognition, 84(2), pp.113~154 (2002)
  17. MacDonald, Maryellen C., "Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution", Psychological Review, 101(4), pp.676~703 (1994)
  18. May, Robert, "The grammar of quantification", PhD, pp.1977
  19. May, Robert, "Logical Form : Its structure and derivation" (1985), MIT Press
  20. Musolino, Julien, "Universal Grammar and the acquisition of semantic knowledge: An experimental investigation of quantifier-negation interaction in English", PhD, pp.1998
  21. Musolino, Julien, "Why children aren’t universally successful with quantification", Linguistics, 44(4), pp.817~852 (2006)
  22. Musolino, Julien, "Navigating negative quantificational space", Linguistics, 38(1), pp.1~32 (2000)
  23. O’Grady, William, "The illusion of language acquisition", Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3(3), pp.253~285 (2013)
  24. Orfitelli, Robin M., "Argument intervention in the acquisition of A-movement", PhD, pp.2012
  25. Interface strategies, "Reinhart, Tanya", OTS, ~, pp.TL-95-002 (1995)
  26. Snedeker, Jesse, "Current issues in the psychology of language. Sentence processing" (2013), Psychology Press
  27. Spivey-Knowlton, Michael J., "Context effects in syntactic ambiguity resolution: Parsing reduced relative clauses", Canadian Journal of Psychology, 47(2), pp.276~309 (1993)
  28. Szendrői, Kriszta, "Acquisition of quantifier raising of a universal across an existential: Evidence from German", Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 2(1), pp.46~ (2017)
  29. Tanenhaus, Michael K., "Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension", Science, 268, pp.1632~1634 (1995)
  30. Tannenbaum, Percy H., "Generation of active and passive sentences as a function of subject and object focus", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7(1), pp.246~250 (1968)
  31. Trueswell, John, "Semantic influences on parsing : Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution", Journal of Memory and Language, 33(3), pp.285~318 (1994)
  32. Trueswell, John, "The kindergarden-path effect : Studying on-line sentence processing in children", Cognition, 73(2), pp.89~134 (1999)
  33. Viau, Joshua, "Priming of abstract logical representations in 4-year-olds", Language Acquisition, 17(1-2), pp.26~50 (2010)
  34. Wexler, Kenneth, "Formal principles of language acquisition" (1980), MIT Press
  35. Yamakoshi, Kyoko, "Children’s interpretations of some", every interactions in mono-clausal and biclausal structures in Japanese, 2007, pp.2, 471~482[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)