COILにおける協働的な課題解決学習の試み -学習内省シートと期末レポートの事例分析から-
An Attempt for Collaborative Problem-solving in COIL - An Analysis of Introspection Sheets and Term-end Papers-
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The author brings awareness to the problem arising from international learning, and proposes online intercultural collaborative learning (hereinafter abbreviated as COIL). It involves Collaborative Problem-Solving through multi-layered dialogues with new knowledge between learners and others. This study examines the learning process and results focusing on theproblem-solving aspect, and explores the potential and significance of collaborative problem-based learning in COIL. A qualitative analysis using the introspection sheets and the final report finds the following: 1 The program has improved cognitive and emotional aspects of the students, and can help make more thoughtful and feasible proposals compared with individual problem-solving. 2 Proposals for problem-solving can be classified into the most ideal "integrated type", "alternative type", and the most undesirable "dismissing type". 3 In order to prevent "dismissing" proposals, it is important to improve learners' dialogue skills and provide opportunities to speak while emphasizing personal relationship.
Abstract
The author brings awareness to the problem arising from international learning, and proposes online intercultural collaborative learning (hereinafter abbreviated as COIL). It involves Collaborative Problem-Solving through multi-layered dialogues with new knowledge between learners and others. This study examines the learning process and results focusing on theproblem-solving aspect, and explores the potential and significance of collaborative problem-based learning in COIL. A qualitative analysis using the introspection sheets and the final report finds the following: 1 The program has improved cognitive and emotional aspects of the students, and can help make more thoughtful and feasible proposals compared with individual problem-solving. 2 Proposals for problem-solving can be classified into the most ideal "integrated type", "alternative type", and the most undesirable "dismissing type". 3 In order to prevent "dismissing" proposals, it is important to improve learners' dialogue skills and provide opportunities to speak while emphasizing personal relationship.
참고문헌 (10)
- 池田佳子, "アウトバウンド促進授業実践としてのCOIL（オンライン国際連携学習）", グローバル人材育成教育研究, 2, pp.65~70 (2015)
- 池田玲子, "ピア・ラーニング入門創造的な学びのデザインのために" (2007), ひつじ書房
- 北出慶子, "留学生と日本人学生の異文化間コミュニケーション能力育成を目指した協働学習授業の提案 : 異文化間コミュニケーション能力理論と実践から", 立命館言語文化研究, 9, pp.65~90 (2010)
- 小玉安恵, "オンラインによる異文化間協働型の日本文化の授業COILの試み : 異文化間で活躍できる人材の育成をめざして", 日本語教育, 169, pp.93~108 (2018)
- 金孝卿, "オンラインでのケース学習における学習者の学び:問題解決のための協働的なコミュニケーションに着目して", 多文化社会と留学生交流 : 大阪大学国際教育交流センター研究論集, 23, pp.43~52 (2019)
- 當作靖彦, "外国語学習のめやす2012-高等学校の中国語と韓国語教育からの提言" (2012), 国際文化フォーラム
- Guth,Sarah, "Globally NetworkedTeaching in the Humanities:Theories and Practices" (2015), Routledge
- 佐藤学黃郁倫, "「學習共同體-構想與實踐」『親子天下』", ~ (2013)
- 劉曼君, "學生學習成果之評量及評分量表Rubrics之使用", 評鑑雙月刊, 48, pp.54~56 (2014)
- "COIL ガイド"[URL]