본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

동서양의 전통 평대패 비교 연구

A Study on the Comparison of Traditional Flat Plane of the East and the West

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In this paper, a study is conducted to compare and analyze the similarities and differences of flat planes commonly used by mankind. The traditional flat plane showed a common structure in which the plane blade is fixed to the plane due to the functional characteristics of processing the plane. However, the hand tool called ‘traditional flat plane’ also has different characteristics from Korea, China, and Japan, which represented the East, and the West also has characteristics that distinguish it from the East. This paper compares and analyzes six items that the appearance of the plane, the fixing method of the blade, the fixing angle of the blade, the working method, the formative characteristics, and the materials used in the plane for the flat planes commonly used by humankind. Traditional planes used in different cultures developed by exchanging influences with neighboring countries, and differences and commonalities were identified by country.

Abstract

In this paper, a study is conducted to compare and analyze the similarities and differences of flat planes commonly used by mankind. The traditional flat plane showed a common structure in which the plane blade is fixed to the plane due to the functional characteristics of processing the plane. However, the hand tool called ‘traditional flat plane’ also has different characteristics from Korea, China, and Japan, which represented the East, and the West also has characteristics that distinguish it from the East. This paper compares and analyzes six items that the appearance of the plane, the fixing method of the blade, the fixing angle of the blade, the working method, the formative characteristics, and the materials used in the plane for the flat planes commonly used by humankind. Traditional planes used in different cultures developed by exchanging influences with neighboring countries, and differences and commonalities were identified by country.

참고문헌 (50)

  1. 김삼대자, "한눈에 보는 소목", pp.14~ (2018), 한국공예문화진흥원
  2. 김동욱, "한⋅중⋅일 전통목조건축 大木匠의 역사와 도구", pp.64~139 (2012), 수원화성박물관
  3. 무라타 겐이찌, "일본 전통건축의 이해", pp.120~122 (2009), 한국학술정보(주)
  4. 배희한, "이제 이 조선톱에도녹이 슬었네", pp.60~67 (1982), 뿌리깊은 나무
  5. 영건의궤연구회, "영건의궤: 의궤에 기록된 조선시대 건축", pp.987~990 (2010), 도서출판 동녘
  6. 요아힘 라트카우, "나무時代", pp.19~ (2013), 자연과생태
  7. 윤봉기, "목재료 및 공작이론", pp.178~181 (1997), 한국산업인력공단
  8. 김기주, "조선시대 건축도구의 사용과 그 특성", 건축역사연구, 14(2), pp.247~261 (2005)
  9. 이운천, "부여 출토 고대 평목공구의 기능과 명칭–탕(鐋) 추정 유물-", 무형유산, (2), pp.187~210 (2017), 국립무형유산원[DOI]
  10. 이왕기, "문화재 보수공사에 사용된 건축도구와 전통 건축기술의 보존", 건축역사연구, 14(2), pp.262~277 (2005)
  11. Evarts, C, "Beyond the screen:Chinese Furniture of the 16th and 17th Centuries", pp.158~ (1996), Museum of Fine Arts Boston
  12. Goodman, W. L, "The history of woodworking tools", pp.9~208 (1972), Redwood Press
  13. Hack, G, "Classic hand tools", pp.100~218 (1999), Taunton Press
  14. Hummel, C. F, "With hammer in hand: the Dominy craftsmen of East Hampton", pp.105~424 (1976), The University Press of Virginia
  15. Mercer, H. C, "Ancient Carpenters' Tools: Illustrated and Explained, Together with the Implements of the Lumberman, Joiner, and Cabinet-maker in Use in the Eighteenth Century", pp.115~339 (2000), Courier Corporation
  16. Nagyszalanczy, S, "The art of fine tools", pp.170~232 (1998), Taunton Press
  17. date, T, "Japanese woodworking tools: their tradition, spirit and use", pp.80~189 (1998), Taunton Press Inc
  18. Peter C. W, "Woodworking Tools 1600-1900", pp.33~81 (2012), Oxford City Press
  19. Roger, B. U, "Roman Woodworking", pp.13~376 (2007), Yale University Press
  20. Salaman, R. A, "Dictionary of Woodworking Tools c. 1700–1970 and Tools of Allied Trades", pp.299~546 (1997), Astragal Press
  21. Takenaka Carpentry Tools Museum, "Traditional European Woodworking tools", pp.96~192 (1992), Toppan Printing Co., Ltd
  22. Funabiki, E, "HISTORICAL CHANGES OF THE PLANE IN THE MODERN ERA", AIJ Journal of Technology and Design, 17(37), pp.1043~1048 (2011)
  23. Pan, Y, "A Study of Western Influence on Chinese Building Tools in Chinese Treaty Ports in the Early 20th Century", Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 17(2), pp.183~190 (2018)
  24. 이정, "作工具", pp.263~276 (2015), 同济大学出版社
  25. 콩판셩, "菏泽元代古沉船出土平木工具 “刨子”初探 研究", 中国文物学会学报, 11(9), pp.1~2 (2011)
  26. 왕장광, "黔东南地区传统手工木工工具刨床研究", 重庆建筑学会学报, 20(6), pp.17~ (2020)
  27. 왕위에, "传统木刨制造技艺研究", 古建筑与景观技术学报, 18(3), pp.19~24 (2018)
  28. 하탕쿤, "平木用刨考 研究", 中国文物学会, 06(7), pp.91~92 (1996)
  29. 주영, "刨的发展与明式家具气质文化研究", 百家艺术杂志, 16(6), pp.243~244 (2016)
  30. "Heze Yuandai gu chenchuan chutu pingmu gongju: “baozi” chutan (The planing tool excavated from Heze Ship Wrecks: A preliminary study on ‘bao’)" (2011)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)