攝政王 도르곤의 北京 점령과 遷都의 실행
The Occupation and Establishment of the Capital in Early Qing Beijing
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article examines the policies that the headquarters of Prince Regent Dorgon implemented after the occupation of Beijing in 1644. Due to Dorgon’s meticulous work, the newly established “Beijing Court” was able to secure a significant degree of control and authority over the newly conquered area, but stabilizing the disorder and chaos that happened after the fall of the Ming and the conquest of Qing required more time and effort. It is no surprise that the initial round of policies in Beijing were mostly impromptu and reactive. Still, Dorgon fully understood that securing Beijing was essential in securing his authority and therefore continued to introduce new policies – sometimes forcefully, sometimes through negotiations – to stabilize the rule of Beijing. Amidst the continuous talks between the “Beijing Court” of Dorgon, and the “Shengjing Court” of Shunzhi emperor, transferring the capital to Beijing became understood and confirmed. Finally, on the nineteenth day of the ninth month in 1644, Shunzhi emperor himself moved to Beijing, and with the accession ceremony held on the first day of the tenth month, the official transfer of the Qing capital was completed. The once temporary “Beijing Court” now became the new official capital of the Qing dynasty. In this process of establishing the Beijing as the seat of the imperial government, Dorgon set new firm principles of rule, administration and conquest. It was evident that the Qing was willing to adjust and yield their policies according to the changing circumstance around their conquest and settlement. However, at the very same time, there were strict principles that the Manchus would adhere to and not abandon. In the very end, it was another vivid example of the “Manchu Way.”
Abstract
This article examines the policies that the headquarters of Prince Regent Dorgon implemented after the occupation of Beijing in 1644. Due to Dorgon’s meticulous work, the newly established “Beijing Court” was able to secure a significant degree of control and authority over the newly conquered area, but stabilizing the disorder and chaos that happened after the fall of the Ming and the conquest of Qing required more time and effort. It is no surprise that the initial round of policies in Beijing were mostly impromptu and reactive. Still, Dorgon fully understood that securing Beijing was essential in securing his authority and therefore continued to introduce new policies – sometimes forcefully, sometimes through negotiations – to stabilize the rule of Beijing. Amidst the continuous talks between the “Beijing Court” of Dorgon, and the “Shengjing Court” of Shunzhi emperor, transferring the capital to Beijing became understood and confirmed. Finally, on the nineteenth day of the ninth month in 1644, Shunzhi emperor himself moved to Beijing, and with the accession ceremony held on the first day of the tenth month, the official transfer of the Qing capital was completed. The once temporary “Beijing Court” now became the new official capital of the Qing dynasty. In this process of establishing the Beijing as the seat of the imperial government, Dorgon set new firm principles of rule, administration and conquest. It was evident that the Qing was willing to adjust and yield their policies according to the changing circumstance around their conquest and settlement. However, at the very same time, there were strict principles that the Manchus would adhere to and not abandon. In the very end, it was another vivid example of the “Manchu Way.”
참고문헌 (31)
- "內閣大庫檔案", 臺灣中央硏究院歷史語言硏究所 所藏, ~
- 中央硏究院歷史語言硏究所, "明淸史料" (1936), 商務印書館
- "譯註 昭顯瀋陽日記 4", 奎章閣所藏東宮日記譯註叢書 10, ~ (2008)
- "朝鮮王朝實錄"[URL]
- 王鍾翰, "淸史列傳" (1987), 中華書局
- "淸實錄" (1985), 中華書局
- 中國第一歷史檔案館, "淸初內國史院滿文檔案譯編" (1989), 光明日報出版社
- 2012, , ~
- 이영옥, "견제받는 권력 : 만주인 청나라의 정치구조, 1616~1912" (2016), 전남대학교출판부
- 정병철, "‘天崩地裂’의 時代, 明末淸初의 華北社會" (2008), 전남대학교
- 吳建雍, "北京城市發展史 淸代卷" (2008), 北京燕山出版社
- 王崗, "北京政治史" (2008), 人民出版社
- 曹子西, "北京通史 (全十冊)" (2011), 北京燕山出版社
- 周遠廉, "淸攝政王多爾袞全傳" (2008), 陝西人民出版社
- 磯部淳史, "淸初皇帝政治の硏究" (2016), 風間書房
- 新宮學, "북경 천도 연구 –근세 중국의 首都 이전" (2016), 서경문화사
- Frederic Wakeman Jr., "洪業 –淸朝開國史" (1995), 江蘇人民出版社
- Mark C. Elliott, "만주족의 청제국" (2009), 푸른역사
- 박민수, "首都 北京의 州縣 행정― 明末ㆍ淸初 京縣의 운영을 중심으로 ―", 동양사학연구, (140), pp.369~413 (2017), 동양사학회[DOI]
- 박민수, "1644년 山海關 전투와 淸軍의 北京 입성", 중국사연구, (110), pp.103~145 (2017), 중국사학회[DOI]
- 吳金成, "韓㳓劤博士停年紀念史學論叢" (1981), 知識産業社
- 全明姬, "順治初期의 反淸運動 硏究 -薙髮令과 漢族의 抵抗運動을 中心으로", 淑大史論, 10 (1979)
- 조영헌, "원·명·청 시대 首都 북경과 陪都의 변천", 역사학보, (209), pp.63~106 (2011), 역사학회
- 최갑순, "淸朝 支配의 理念的 指向과 國家祭祀 運營 -順治~乾隆時期를 중심으로", 역사문화연구, (34), pp.339~388 (2009), 역사문화연구소
- 劉仲華, "略述多爾袞進京後的招降安撫與京城局勢", 東北史地 (2015)
- 李凱燦, "多爾袞與淸初弊政整飭", 北京科技大學學報 (2003)
- 褚若千, "淸政權定都北京的最終決策", 中國檔案報 (2015)
- 趙毅, "淸初攝政時期的國家財政收支及特點-再評攝政王多爾袞", 東北師大學報 (1992)
- 谷井陽子, "明末淸初の社會と文化" (1996), 京都大學人文科學硏究所
- 敦冰河, "淸初國家意識の形成と轉換 -アイシン國から大淸國へ", 東洋學報, 83(1) (2001)
- Chen-main Wang, "The Scholar's Mind: Essays in Honor of Frederick W. Mote" (2009), Chinese University Press
