Current and Future CONSIDERATIONS for the Use of Artificial Intelligence by the United States’ Department of Defense
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The “Narrow” AI technologies and its application to different sectors in the U.S. have brought tre-mendous advantages to the country and its citizens. This paper attempts to examine the opportunities and risks of AI’s potential application to the military health care sector. Yet, some human rights concerns remain. This paper further argues that the new Biden administration should pursue policies that reinforce a human-centric AI to be more supportive of human rights. Method: This paper employs the politics of responsibility theory to examine the present and future of AI re-sponsible governance in the Biden era. Based on resources from various AI related research by the U.S. gov-ernment, scholars, and experts, this paper further attempts to examine the opportunities and challenges in the ethical area that will likely be generated by applying AI to the American system of military health care. Results: This paper finds that the application of AI in military health care would likely provide immense op-portunities, especially in times of COVID-19. However, there are risks posed by the application of AI in various sectors as well as in military health care. Meanwhile, the new Biden administration’s future policymaking stage should emphasize ways in which AI may remain human-centric to be more supportive of human rights. Conclusion: In incorporating AI into virtually every economic sector and into daily life, the U.S. government, together with all sectors of society, should seek ways to maximize opportunities and minimize the risk of over-dependence or unregulated exposure to an intelligence far beyond the human level. The new Biden administra-tion should be at the forefront in promoting responsible AI policymaking to be more supportive of human rights.
Abstract
Purpose: The “Narrow” AI technologies and its application to different sectors in the U.S. have brought tre-mendous advantages to the country and its citizens. This paper attempts to examine the opportunities and risks of AI’s potential application to the military health care sector. Yet, some human rights concerns remain. This paper further argues that the new Biden administration should pursue policies that reinforce a human-centric AI to be more supportive of human rights. Method: This paper employs the politics of responsibility theory to examine the present and future of AI re-sponsible governance in the Biden era. Based on resources from various AI related research by the U.S. gov-ernment, scholars, and experts, this paper further attempts to examine the opportunities and challenges in the ethical area that will likely be generated by applying AI to the American system of military health care. Results: This paper finds that the application of AI in military health care would likely provide immense op-portunities, especially in times of COVID-19. However, there are risks posed by the application of AI in various sectors as well as in military health care. Meanwhile, the new Biden administration’s future policymaking stage should emphasize ways in which AI may remain human-centric to be more supportive of human rights. Conclusion: In incorporating AI into virtually every economic sector and into daily life, the U.S. government, together with all sectors of society, should seek ways to maximize opportunities and minimize the risk of over-dependence or unregulated exposure to an intelligence far beyond the human level. The new Biden administra-tion should be at the forefront in promoting responsible AI policymaking to be more supportive of human rights.
참고문헌 (36)
- Anand SR, "Sizing the Prize: What’s the Real Value of AI for Your Business and How Can You Capitalize?", PricewaterhouseCoopers, ~ (2017)
- Maas M, "Innovation-proof Global Governance for Military Artificial Intelligence?", Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies, 10, pp.129~158 (2019)
- Himmerlreich J., "Responsibility for Killer Robots", Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 22, pp.731~747 (2019)
- Burri T, "The Politics of Robot Autonomy", European Journal of Risk Regulation, 7(2), pp.341~360 (2016)
- Sayler K., "Emerging Military Technologies: Background and Issues for Congress", Congressional Research Service, ~ (2020)
- Sikkink K, "The Hidden Face of Rights toward a Politics of Responsibilities", pp.2020
- West D, "rning Point: Policymaking in the Era of Artificial Intelligence", The Brookings Institution, ~ (2020)
- Harris L., "Overview of Artificial Intelligence", Congressional Research Service, ~ (2017)
- Yi Li, "The Advent of AI and Its Some Implications to MILITARY AFFAIRS", International Journal of Military Affairs, 5(1), pp.38~47 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
- Sayler K, "Artificial Intelligence and National Security", Congressional Research Service (2020)
- 김현수, "Ethical Issues on AI Equipped Combat ROBOTS", Robotics & AI Ethics, 5(2), pp.1~7 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
- Mendez B, "Military Medical Malpractice and the Feres Doctrine", Congressional Research Service (2019)
- 박균열, "Virtue for Post COVID-19 and AI Technology", Robotics & AI Ethics, 5(2), pp.8~18 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
- Eubanks V, "Automating Inequality: How High-tech Tools Profile", Police, and Punish the Poor. St. Martin’s, ~ (2018)
- Obermeyer Z, "Dissecting Racial Biases in an Algorithm Used to Manage the Health of Populations", Science, 366(6464), pp.447~453 (2019)
- Panch T, "Artificial Intelligence and Algorithmic Bias: Implications for Health Systems", Journal of Global Health, 9(2), pp.1~5 (2019)
- Baru C, "The National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan", National Science and Technology Council: Networking and Information Technology Research and Development Subcommittee, 1~48 (2016)
- 박균열, "COVID-19 and Some Implications to AI", Robotics & AI Ethics, 5(1), pp.16~24 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
- Harmon S, "Artificial Intelligence for the Detection of COVID-19 Pneumonia on Chest CT Using Multinational Datasets", Nature Communications, 11, pp.4080~4080 (2020)
- Scott I, "Can AI Help in the Fight against Covid-19? Period", The Medical Journal of Australia, 2013(10), pp.439~441 (2020)
- McCain J, , ~ (2018)
- Work R., "Department of Defense: Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, and Cloud Taxonomy", Govini, ~ (2017)
- "Defense Innovation Board. AI Principles: Recommendations on the Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence", The U.S. Department of Defense, ~ (2019)
- Vought R, "Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies: Guidance for Regulations of Artificial Intelligence Applications", Executive Office of the President: Office of the Management and Budget, 2106, pp.1~16 (2020)
- Yi Li, "AI Ethics and Privacy Right", Robotics & AI Ethics, 5(2), pp.27~33 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
- Bialek A, "What’s the Big Deal about Privacy?", The National Law Review, 10(30), pp.1~6 (2020)
- Rodrigues R., "Legal and Human Rights Issues of AI: Gaps, Challenges and Vulnerabilities", Journal of Responsible Technology, 4, pp.1~12 (2020)
- Saetra H., "A Shallow Defense of a Technocracy of Artificial Intelligence: Examining the Political Harms of Algorithmic Governance in the Domain of Government", Technology in Society, 62, pp.1~10 (2020)