본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

An Exploratory Study on the Relationship among CEO Dominant Power, Organizational Performances, and the Endogenous / Exogenous Factors

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper is aimed to investigate the relationship between CEO dominant power and organizational performances and examine the influence of endogenous / exogenous factors on the relationship of them. We developed and tested hypotheses using data from 147 manufacturing firms with only one CEO among 437 listed manufacturing firms in Korean Stock Market as of 2014. To measure the variables, In particular, we classified CEO dominant power into CEO dominant power in organizational structure (CEO's tenure, CEO's share ratio) and CEO dominant power in corporate governance (ratio of outside directors, ratio of institutional investors). Endogenous factor is whether or not firms belong to large corporation group, and exogenous factor is intensity of industry competition. We apply multiple and hierarchical regression analysis, and ANOVA to test hypotheses. The results of the study are as follows; Firstly, CEO dominant power in organizational structure (CEO's tenure, CEO's share ratio) has a positive effects on organizational performances. However, CEO dominant power in corporate governance, and the interaction of the two types of the CEO dominant power do not have statistically significant effects on organizational performances. Secondly, whether the large corporation group as an endogenous factor and the intensity of industry competition as an exogenous factor do not play moderating role in the relationship between CEO dominant power and organizational performances. This study measured the CEO's dominant power of the listed manufacturing companies in Korean Stock Market by using the CEO's tenure and CEO's share ratio, not the demographic (or psychological) characteristics. And we also found that the stronger dominant power of CEO in organization structure, the more positively it can play a role in the improvement of the organizational performances. The results of this study will help us to understand the role of endogenous and exogenous factors (whether or not firms belong to large corporation group, and intensity of industry competition) in relationship between the CEO's dominant power and organizational performances in Korean Stock Market. In addition, this study will provide an opportunity to think more deeply about the moderating role of endogenous and exogenous factors in the relationship.

Abstract

This paper is aimed to investigate the relationship between CEO dominant power and organizational performances and examine the influence of endogenous / exogenous factors on the relationship of them. We developed and tested hypotheses using data from 147 manufacturing firms with only one CEO among 437 listed manufacturing firms in Korean Stock Market as of 2014. To measure the variables, In particular, we classified CEO dominant power into CEO dominant power in organizational structure (CEO's tenure, CEO's share ratio) and CEO dominant power in corporate governance (ratio of outside directors, ratio of institutional investors). Endogenous factor is whether or not firms belong to large corporation group, and exogenous factor is intensity of industry competition. We apply multiple and hierarchical regression analysis, and ANOVA to test hypotheses. The results of the study are as follows; Firstly, CEO dominant power in organizational structure (CEO's tenure, CEO's share ratio) has a positive effects on organizational performances. However, CEO dominant power in corporate governance, and the interaction of the two types of the CEO dominant power do not have statistically significant effects on organizational performances. Secondly, whether the large corporation group as an endogenous factor and the intensity of industry competition as an exogenous factor do not play moderating role in the relationship between CEO dominant power and organizational performances. This study measured the CEO's dominant power of the listed manufacturing companies in Korean Stock Market by using the CEO's tenure and CEO's share ratio, not the demographic (or psychological) characteristics. And we also found that the stronger dominant power of CEO in organization structure, the more positively it can play a role in the improvement of the organizational performances. The results of this study will help us to understand the role of endogenous and exogenous factors (whether or not firms belong to large corporation group, and intensity of industry competition) in relationship between the CEO's dominant power and organizational performances in Korean Stock Market. In addition, this study will provide an opportunity to think more deeply about the moderating role of endogenous and exogenous factors in the relationship.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. Abernethy, M. A., "The Influence of CEO Power on Compensation Contract Design", THE ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 90(4), pp.1265~1306 (2015)
  2. Ahmed, A., "Managerial overconfidence and accounting conservatism", Journal of Accounting Research, 51(1), pp.1~20 (2013)
  3. Barbora Nevicka, "All I need is a stage to shine: Narcissists' leader emergence and performances", Journal The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), pp.910~925 (2011)
  4. Bebchuk, L. A., "Executive compensation as an agency problem", Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(3), pp.71~92 (2003)
  5. Bebchuk, L. A., "Pay Without performances: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive Compensation" (2004), Harvard University Press
  6. Boyd, B. K., "Board control and CEO compensation", Strategic Management Journal, 15(5), pp.335~344 (1994)
  7. Chang J. J., "Governance system effectiveness following the crisis: The case of Korean business group headquarters", Corporate Governance. An International Review, 14(2), pp.85~97 (2006)
  8. DeFond Mark L., "The effect of competition on CEO turnover1", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 27(3), pp.35~56 (1999)
  9. Fee C., "Raids, rewards, and reputations in the market for managerial talent", Review of Financial researches, 16(4), pp.1315~1357 (2003)
  10. Finkelstein S., "Power in top management team: dimensions, measurement, and validation", Academy of Management Journal, 35, pp.505~538 (1992)
  11. Finkelstein S., "CEO duality as a double-edged sword: How boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command", The Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), pp.1079~1108 (1994)
  12. Greve, H.R., "Positional rigidity: low performances and resource acquisition in large and small firms", Strategic Management Journal, 32(1), pp.103~114 (2010)
  13. Corporate Payout Policy and Product Market Competition, "Grullon, G.", SSRN, ~ (2007)
  14. Haleblian, J., "Top management team size, CEO dominant power, and firm performances-The moderating roles of environment turbulence and descretion", Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), pp.844~863 (1993)
  15. Hart, O., "The Market Mechanism as an Incentive Scheme", Bell Journal of Economics, 14(2), pp.366~382 (1983)
  16. Hayward, M. L. A., "Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris", Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), pp.103~127 (1997)
  17. Holmstrom, B., "Moral Hazard in Teams", Bell Journal of Economic, 13(2), pp.324~340 (1982)
  18. Market Structure and Social Efficiency, "Hwang I. H.", Korea Economic Research Institute, ~ (1988)
  19. Jensen, M. C., "The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems", Journal of Finance, 48(3), pp.831~880 (1993)
  20. Kanter, R. M., "Leadership and the psychology of turnarounds", Harvard Business Review, 81, pp.58~67 (2003)
  21. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, "Politics of Strategic Decision Making in High-Velocity Environments", Toward a Midrange Theory, 31(4), pp.737~770 (1988)
  22. Keltner, D., "Power, approach, and i nhibition", Psychological Review, 110, pp.265~284 (2003)
  23. Kim N. Y., "Factors affecting the relationship between managerial overconfidence and earnings management: focusing on pay-performances sensitivity and industry competition", Doctor, pp.2017
  24. La Porta, R., "Agency Problem and Dividend Policies around the World", Journal of Finance, 55(1), pp.1~33 (2000)
  25. Li, J., "CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: the moderating role of managerial discretion", Academy of Management Journal, 53, pp.45~68 (2010)
  26. Malmendier, U., "CEO Overconfidence and Corporate Investment", The Journal of Finance, 60(6), pp.2661~2700 (2005)
  27. Malmendier, U., "Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market’s reaction", Journal of Financial Economics, 89, pp.20~43 (2008)
  28. Maslow, A. H., "Dominance e feeling, behavior, and status", Psychological Review, 44, pp.404~429 (1937)
  29. Miller. D., "Successful and Unsuccessful Phases of the Corporate Life Cycle", Organization researches, 4(4), pp.339~356 (1983)
  30. Nickell, S. J., "Competition and Corporate performances", Journal of Political Economy, 104(4), pp.724~746 (1996)
  31. Noh J. W., "Measures of Hospital Market Competition by the Herfindahl Hirschman Index", Health Service Management Review, 1(1), pp.13~22 (2007)
  32. 박종훈, "최고경영자 자기과신과 기업성과: 이사회와 재벌의 조절효과", 경영학연구, 42(3), pp.673~697 (2013), 한국경영학회
  33. Pratto, F., "Social dominance orientation: a personality variable predicting social and political attitudes", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, pp.741~763 (1994)
  34. Priem, R. L., "Inherent limitations of demographic proxies in top management team heterogeneity research", Journal of Management, 25, pp.935~953 (1999)
  35. 류두진, "시장경쟁정도와 기업의 배당에 관한 연구", 기업경영연구, 19(3), pp.255~277 (2012), 한국기업경영학회[DOI]
  36. Shleifer, A., "Stock market driven acquisitions", Journal of Financial Economics, 70, pp.295~311 (2003)
  37. Tang, J., "Are Dominant CEOs the saviors of Troubled Firm?", Long Range Planning, pp.1~12 (2017)
  38. Tang, J., "Dominant CEO, deviant strategy, and extreme performances: the moderating role of a powerful board", Journal of Management researches, 48, pp.1479~1503 (2011)
  39. Terry Campbell, "Corporate governance in South Korea: the chaebol experience", Journal of Corporate Finance, 8(4), pp.373~391 (2002)
  40. van Essen, M., "Assessing managerial power theory: A meta-analytic approach to understanding the determinants of CEO compensation", Journal of management, 41(1), pp.164~202 (2015)
  41. Westphal, J. D., "The symbolic management of stockholders: Corporate governance reforms and shareholder reactions", Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(1), pp.127~153 (1998)
  42. Westphal, J. D., "Who shall govern? CEO", board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection, 1995, pp.40, 60~83
  43. Whitney, J. O., "Taking C harge: M anagement Guide to T roubled Companies and Turnarounds" (1987), Dow Jones-Irwin
  44. Yermack, D., "Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors", Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), pp.185~211 (1996)
  45. Zahra, S. A., "Boards of directors and corporate financial performances:A review and integrative model", Journal of Management, 15(2), pp.291~334 (1989)
  46. Zhu, D. H., "Narcissism, director selection, and risk-taking spending", Strategic Management Journal, 36(13), pp.2075~2098 (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)