Comparison of treatment outcomes in lumbar central stenosis patients treated with epidural steroid injections: interlaminar versus bilateral transforaminal approach
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: We aimed to compare interlaminar epidural steroid injections (ILESI) and bilateral transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESI) on pain intensity, functional status, depression, walking distance, and the neuropathic component in patients with lumbar central spinal stenosis (LCSS). Methods: The patients were divided into either the ILESI or the bilateral TFESI groups. Prime outcome measures include the numerical rating scale (NRS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), Beck depression inventory (BDI), and pain-free walking distance. The douleur neuropathique en 4 questions score was used as a secondary outcome measure. Results: A total of 72 patients were finally included. NRS, ODI, and BDI scores showed a significant decline in both groups in all follow-ups. Third-month NRS scores were significantly lower in the ILESI group (P = 0.047). The percentages of decrease in the ODI and BDI scores between the baseline and the third week and third month were significantly higher in the ILESI group (P = 0.017, P = 0.001 and P = 0.048, P = 0.030, respectively). Pain-free walking distance percentages from the baseline to the third week and third month were significantly higher in the ILESI group (P = 0.036, P < 0.001). The proportion of patients with neuropathic pain in the bilateral TFESI group significantly decreased in the third week compared to the baseline (P = 0.020). Conclusions: Both ILESI and TFESI are reliable treatment options for LCSS. ILESI might be preferred because of easier application and more effectiveness. However, TFESI might be a better option in patients with more prominent neuropathic pain.
Abstract
Background: We aimed to compare interlaminar epidural steroid injections (ILESI) and bilateral transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESI) on pain intensity, functional status, depression, walking distance, and the neuropathic component in patients with lumbar central spinal stenosis (LCSS). Methods: The patients were divided into either the ILESI or the bilateral TFESI groups. Prime outcome measures include the numerical rating scale (NRS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), Beck depression inventory (BDI), and pain-free walking distance. The douleur neuropathique en 4 questions score was used as a secondary outcome measure. Results: A total of 72 patients were finally included. NRS, ODI, and BDI scores showed a significant decline in both groups in all follow-ups. Third-month NRS scores were significantly lower in the ILESI group (P = 0.047). The percentages of decrease in the ODI and BDI scores between the baseline and the third week and third month were significantly higher in the ILESI group (P = 0.017, P = 0.001 and P = 0.048, P = 0.030, respectively). Pain-free walking distance percentages from the baseline to the third week and third month were significantly higher in the ILESI group (P = 0.036, P < 0.001). The proportion of patients with neuropathic pain in the bilateral TFESI group significantly decreased in the third week compared to the baseline (P = 0.020). Conclusions: Both ILESI and TFESI are reliable treatment options for LCSS. ILESI might be preferred because of easier application and more effectiveness. However, TFESI might be a better option in patients with more prominent neuropathic pain.
참고문헌 (27)
- Kalichman L, "Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms : the Framingham Study", Spine J, 9, pp.545~550 (2009)
- Hall S, "Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical features, diagnostic procedures, and results of surgical treatment in 68patients", Ann Intern Med, 103, pp.271~275 (1985)
- Chad DA, "Lumbar spinal stenosis", Neurol Clin, 25, pp.407~418 (2007)
- Lee JH, "Comparison of the effectiveness of interlaminar and bilateral transforaminal epidural steroid injections in treatment of patients with lumbosacral disc herniation and spinal stenosis", Clin J Pain, 25, pp.206~210 (2009)
- Smith CC, "Interlaminar versus transforaminal epidural steroid injections for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis", Pain Med, 11, pp.1511~1515 (2010)
- Baron R, "How neuropathic is sciatica? The mixed pain concept", Orthopade, 33, pp.568~575 (2004)
- Atlas SJ, "The Quebec Task Force classification for spinal disorders and the severity, treatment, and outcomes of sciatica and lumbar spinal stenosis", Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 21, pp.2885~2892 (1996)
- Rados I, "painDETECT questionnaire and lumbar epidural steroid injection for chronic radiculopathy", Eur Neurol, 69, pp.27~32 (2013)
- Schizas C, "Decision-making in lumbar spinal stenosis : a survey on the influence of the morphology of the dural sac", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 94, pp.98~101 (2012)
- Manchikanti L, "A randomized, double-blind controlled trial of lumbar interlaminar epidural injections in central spinal stenosis : 2-year follow-up", Pain Physician, 18, pp.79~92 (2015)
- Smith CC, "The effectiveness of lumbar transforaminal injection of steroid for the treatment of radicular pain : a comprehensive review of the published data", Pain Med, 21, pp.472~487 (2020)
- Farooque M, "Effectiveness of bilateral transforaminal epidural steroid injections in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis patients with neurogenic claudication : a case series", PM R, 9, pp.26~31 (2017)
- Davis N, "Transforaminal epidural steroid injection in lumbar spinal stenosis : an observational study with two-year follow-up", Br J Neurosurg, 31, pp.205~208 (2017)
- Scapinelli R, "Anatomical and radiologic studies on the lumbosacral meningo-vertebral ligaments of humans", J Spinal Disord, 3, pp.6~15 (1990)
- Ghai B, "Transforaminal versus parasagittal interlaminar epidural steroid injection in low back pain with radicular pain : a randomized, doubleblind, active-control trial", Pain Physician, 17, pp.277~290 (2014)
- Manchikanti L, "An update of comprehensive evidence-based guidelines for interventional techniques in chronic spinal pain. Part II: guidance and recommendations", Pain Physician, 16(2 Suppl), pp.S49~283 (2013)
- Weil L, "Fluoroscopic analysis of lumbar epidural contrast spread after lumbar interlaminar injection", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 89, pp.413~416 (2008)
- Tahmasbi Sohi M, "Transient hypokalemic quadriplegia after a lumbar transforaminal epidural dexamethasone injection : a case report", PM R, 10, pp.544~547 (2018)
- Sarı S, "Effect of transforaminal anterior epidural steroid injection on neuropathic pain, quality of sleep and life", Agri, 27, pp.83~88 (2015)
- Batistaki C, "Electromyographic findings after epidural steroid injections in patients with radicular low back pain : a prospective open-label study", Anesth Pain Med, 7, pp.e62556~ (2017)
- 김호중, "Validation of the Korean Version of the DN4 Diagnostic Questionnaire for Neuropathic Pain in Patients with Lumbar or Lumbar-Radicular Pain", Yonsei Medical Journal, 57(2), pp.449~454 (2016), 연세대학교의과대학[DOI]
- Kapil Gudala, "Usefulness of four commonly used neuropathic pain screening questionnaires in patients with chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study", The Korean Journal of Pain, 30(1), pp.51~58 (2017), 대한통증학회
- Andrasinova T, "Evaluation of the neuropathic component of chronic low back pain", Clin J Pain, 35, pp.7~17 (2019)
- 김진환, "Prevalence of Neuropathic Pain and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Korean Adults with Chronic Low Back Pain Resulting from Neuropathic Low Back Pain", Asian Spine Journal, 11(6), pp.917~927 (2017), 대한척추외과학회
- Bogduk N, "Practice guidelines for spinal diagnostic and treatment procedures", pp.459~538 (2013), International Spine Intervention Society
- Clements N, "Trends in steroid agent and diluent choices for epidural steroid injections : a survey of Spine Intervention Society physicians", Reg Anesth Pain Med (2019)[DOI]
- Chatterjee N, "Comparative efficacy of methylprednisolone acetate and dexamethasone disodium phosphate in lumbosacral transforaminal epidural steroid injections", Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim, 47, pp.414~419 (2019)