Percutaneous Adhesiolysis Versus Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection for the Treatment of Chronic Radicular Pain Caused by Lumbar Foraminal Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Comparative Study
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective To investigate the efficacy of percutaneous adhesiolysis (PA) compared to fluoroscopy (FL)-guided transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) in patients with radicular pain caused by lumbar foraminal spinal stenosis (LFSS) by assessing pain relief and functional improvement at 4 and 12 weeks post-procedure. Methods This retrospective study included 45 patients who underwent PA or FL-guided TFSEI for radicular pain caused by LFSS of at least 3 months’ duration. Outcomes were assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Verbal Numeric Pain Scale (VNS) before the procedure and at 4 and 12 weeks post-procedure. A successful outcome was defined by >50% improvement in the VNS score and >40% improvement in the ODI score. Results ODI and VNS scores improved 4 and 12 weeks post-procedure in both groups. Statistically significant differences between groups were observed in ODI and VNS at 12 weeks (p<0.05). The proportion of patients with successful outcomes was significantly different between the two groups only at the 12-week time point. Conclusion Our study suggests that PA is effective for pain reduction and functional improvement in patients with chronic radicular pain caused by LFSS. Therefore, PA can be considered for patients with previous ineffective responses to conservative treatment. Although PA seems to be more effective than TFEFI according to the results of our study, in order to fully elucidate the difference in effectiveness, a prospective study with a larger sample size is necessary.
Abstract
Objective To investigate the efficacy of percutaneous adhesiolysis (PA) compared to fluoroscopy (FL)-guided transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) in patients with radicular pain caused by lumbar foraminal spinal stenosis (LFSS) by assessing pain relief and functional improvement at 4 and 12 weeks post-procedure. Methods This retrospective study included 45 patients who underwent PA or FL-guided TFSEI for radicular pain caused by LFSS of at least 3 months’ duration. Outcomes were assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Verbal Numeric Pain Scale (VNS) before the procedure and at 4 and 12 weeks post-procedure. A successful outcome was defined by >50% improvement in the VNS score and >40% improvement in the ODI score. Results ODI and VNS scores improved 4 and 12 weeks post-procedure in both groups. Statistically significant differences between groups were observed in ODI and VNS at 12 weeks (p<0.05). The proportion of patients with successful outcomes was significantly different between the two groups only at the 12-week time point. Conclusion Our study suggests that PA is effective for pain reduction and functional improvement in patients with chronic radicular pain caused by LFSS. Therefore, PA can be considered for patients with previous ineffective responses to conservative treatment. Although PA seems to be more effective than TFEFI according to the results of our study, in order to fully elucidate the difference in effectiveness, a prospective study with a larger sample size is necessary.
참고문헌 (38)
- Jenis LG, "Spine update: lumbar foraminal stenosis", Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 25, pp.389~394 (2000)
- Kunogi J, "Diagnosis and operative treatment of intraforaminal and extraforaminal nerve root compression", Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 16, pp.1312~1320 (1991)
- Porter RW, "The natural history of root entrapment syndrome", Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 9, pp.418~421 (1984)
- Jinkins JR, "The anatomic basis of vertebrogenic pain and the autonomic syndrome associated with lumbar disk extrusion", AJR Am J Roentgenol, 152, pp.1277~1289 (1989)
- Thomas E, "Efficacy of transforaminal versus interspinous corticosteroid injectionin discal radiculalgia: a prospective, randomised, double-blind study", Clin Rheumatol, 22, pp.299~304 (2003)
- Manchikanti L., "Transforaminal lumbar epidural steroid injections", Pain Physician, 3, pp.374~398 (2000)
- Manchikanti L, "Effectiveness of therapeutic lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections in managing lumbar spinal pain", Pain Physician, 15, pp.E199~E245 (2012)
- Kim SH, "Effects of transforaminal balloon treatment in patients with lumbar foraminal stenosis: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial", Pain Physician, 16, pp.213~224 (2013)
- Fukusaki M, "Symptoms of spinal stenosis do not improve after epidural steroid injection", Clin J Pain, 14, pp.148~151 (1998)
- Smith CC, "Interlaminar versus transforaminal epidural steroid injections for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis", Pain Med, 11, pp.1511~1515 (2010)
- Lee JH, "Clinical effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis versus transforaminal epidural steroid injection in patients with postlumbar surgery syndrome", Reg Anesth Pain Med, 39, pp.214~218 (2014)
- Chopra P, "Role of adhesiolysis in the management of chronic spinal pain: a systematic review of effectiveness and complications", Pain Physician, 8, pp.87~100 (2005)
- Trescot AM, "Systematic review of effectiveness and complications of adhesiolysis in the management of chronic spinal pain: an update", Pain Physician, 10, pp.129~146 (2007)
- Bogduk N., "On the definitions and physiology of back pain, referred pain, and radicular pain", Pain, 147, pp.17~19 (2009)
- Hartrick CT, "The numeric rating scale for clinical pain measurement: a ratio measure?", Pain Pract, 3, pp.310~316 (2003)
- Fairbank JC, "The Oswestry Disability Index", Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 25, pp.2940~2952 (2000)
- Manchikanti L, "Lumbar facet joint nerve blocks in managing chronic facet joint pain: one-year follow-up of a randomized, double-blind controlled trial: Clinical Trial NCT00355914", Pain Physician, 11, pp.121~132 (2008)
- Lee JH, "Comparison of the effectiveness of interlaminar and bilateral transforaminal epidural steroid injections in treatment of patients with lumbosacral disc herniation and spinal stenosis", Clin J Pain, 25, pp.206~210 (2009)
- Kobayashi S, "Effects of arterial ischemia and venous congestion on the lumbar nerve root in dogs", J Orthop Res, 26, pp.1533~1540 (2008)
- Cooper RG, "Herniated intervertebral disc-associated periradicular fibrosis and vascular abnormalities occur without inflammatory cell infiltration", Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 20, pp.591~598 (1995)
- "BMC Anesthesiol", 2005, 10~
- Frank Lee, "Epidural Lysis of Adhesions", The Korean Journal of Pain, 27(1), pp.3~15 (2014), 대한통증학회
- Rabinovitch DL, "Influence of lumbar epidural injection volume on pain relief for radicular leg pain and", or low back pain, 2009, pp.9, 509~517
- Manchikanti L, "The preliminary results of a comparative effectiveness evaluation of adhesiolysis and caudal epidural injections in managing chronic low back pain secondary to spinal stenosis: a randomized, equivalence controlled trial", Pain Physician, 12, pp.E341~E354 (2009)
- Manchikanti L, "Effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis with hypertonic saline neurolysis in refractory spinal stenosis", Pain Physician, 4, pp.366~373 (2001)
- Lee JH, "Clinical effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis and predictive factors of treatment efficacy in patients with lumbosacral spinal stenosis", Pain Med, 14, pp.1497~1504 (2013)
- Lee JH, "Clinical effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis using Navicath for the management of chronic pain due to lumbosacral disc herniation", Pain Physician, 15, pp.213~221 (2012)
- Rivest C, "Effects of epidural steroid injection on pain due to lumbar spinal stenosis or herniated disks: a prospective study", Arthritis Care Res, 11, pp.291~297 (1998)
- Epter RS, "Systematic review of percutaneous adhesiolysis and management of chronic low back pain in post lumbar surgery syndrome", Pain Physician, 12, pp.361~378 (2009)
- Amundsen T, "Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and radiologic features", Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 20, pp.1178~1186 (1995)
- Boden SD, "Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects: a prospective investigation", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 72, pp.1178~1184 (1990)
- Park CH, "Dural sac cross-sectional area does not correlate with efficacy of percutaneous adhesiolysis in single level lumbar spinal stenosis", Pain Physician, 14, pp.377~382 (2011)
- Choi E, "Evaluation of prognostic predictors of percutaneous adhesiolysis using a Racz catheter for post lumbar surgery syndrome or spinal stenosis", Pain Physician, 16, pp.E531~E536 (2013)
- Yousef AA, "The role of adding hyaluronidase to fluoroscopically guided caudal steroid and hypertonic saline injection in patients with failed back surgery syndrome: a prospective, double-blinded, randomized study", Pain Pract, 10, pp.548~553 (2010)
- 김상범, "The Effect of Hyaluronidase in Interlaminar Lumbar Epidural Injection for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 36(4), pp.466~473 (2012), 대한재활의학회
- 김상범, "The Additional Effect of Hyaluronidase in Lumbar Interlaminar Epidural Injection", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 35(3), pp.405~411 (2011), 대한재활의학회
- Manchikanti L, "A prospective evaluation of complications of 10,000 fluoroscopically directed epidural injections", Pain Physician, 15, pp.131~140 (2012)
- Talu GK, "Complications of epidural neuroplasty:a retrospective evaluation", Neuromodulation, 6, pp.237~247 (2003)
