본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

飛鳥時代の仏教と百済・高句麗の僧

Buddhism in the Asuka Period and Monks from Baekche and Koguryeo

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류불교학

초록

There have been positive and negative observations on the authorship of Prince Shotoku [聖德太子] about the Hokkegisho [法華義疏] as the first book of Japanese Buddhism. Presently, dealing with this problem, I am going to probe the background of the thought of the work. Its characteristics can be summarized into four points. 1. The essence of the work is predicated upon the Fahuayiji [法華義記] by Guangzhaisi Fayun [光宅寺法雲]. 2. There are some parts critical to the theory of Fayun, the first part seeming to be an abstraction of the theory of a master older than Fayun. 3. The second part critical to Fayun’s theory is formed in its efforts to give a unified interpretation on the whole work in correcting some tattered part of the Fahuayiji. 4. The third part critical to Fayun’s theory is formed in its efforts to give an interpretation based upon the scripture in evading some complicated explanations of the Fahuayiji. With other evidences as well, this work is thought to be a work from Asuka period, Prince Shotoku appearing to be its author. Some parts of it are based upon Chinese writings, the first part being based upon the theory of Guangzhaisi Fayun and the second part being based upon the theory of a master older than Fayun, while the former is thought to be transmitted through Hyechong [慧聰] from Baekche, the latter through Hyeja [慧慈] from Koguryeo. Thus, the work Hokkegisho is thought to have been written by Prince Shotoku with the transmission of some theories of Chinese scholar monks through two scholar monks from ancient Korea.

Abstract

There have been positive and negative observations on the authorship of Prince Shotoku [聖德太子] about the Hokkegisho [法華義疏] as the first book of Japanese Buddhism. Presently, dealing with this problem, I am going to probe the background of the thought of the work. Its characteristics can be summarized into four points. 1. The essence of the work is predicated upon the Fahuayiji [法華義記] by Guangzhaisi Fayun [光宅寺法雲]. 2. There are some parts critical to the theory of Fayun, the first part seeming to be an abstraction of the theory of a master older than Fayun. 3. The second part critical to Fayun’s theory is formed in its efforts to give a unified interpretation on the whole work in correcting some tattered part of the Fahuayiji. 4. The third part critical to Fayun’s theory is formed in its efforts to give an interpretation based upon the scripture in evading some complicated explanations of the Fahuayiji. With other evidences as well, this work is thought to be a work from Asuka period, Prince Shotoku appearing to be its author. Some parts of it are based upon Chinese writings, the first part being based upon the theory of Guangzhaisi Fayun and the second part being based upon the theory of a master older than Fayun, while the former is thought to be transmitted through Hyechong [慧聰] from Baekche, the latter through Hyeja [慧慈] from Koguryeo. Thus, the work Hokkegisho is thought to have been written by Prince Shotoku with the transmission of some theories of Chinese scholar monks through two scholar monks from ancient Korea.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. "国史大系 『扶桑略記』 第三", ~
  2. 鎌田茂雄, "中国仏教史 第5巻", pp.6~ (1994), 東京大学出版会
  3. 花山信勝, "聖徳太子御製 法華義疏の研究", pp.1~ (1933), 東洋文庫
  4. 津田左右吉, "日本古典の研究 上" (1972), 岩波書店
  5. 大野達之助, "聖徳太子の研究" (1970), 吉川弘文館
  6. "高僧伝", ~
  7. "法華玄義", ~
  8. "義疏", ~
  9. "義記", ~
  10. "三国史記", ~
  11. 平凡社, "三国史記 五", pp.368~369

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (2건)