본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

百濟道藏의 <成實論疏> 逸文에 대해서

The Significance of the Fragments of Dojang’s Commentary on Chengshi lun in Baekje Period

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류불교학

초록

We can hardly find historical sources for investigating the Buddhist thought in Baekje period, even most of them depending upon sources from China and Japan. This article purports to further the study of the Buddhist thought in that period through presenting some fragments of Dojang’s Commentary on Chengshi lun in that period and investigating its historical significance. In Baekje period, it is surmised that there had been some studies of Lotus Sutra and Nirvana Sutra in addition to the spreading of the studies of Buddhist precepts. Buddhist studies in Baekje are thought to have been transmitted to Japan and to have greatly prompted the early development of studies on Buddhist precepts and San lun. Especially, the writing of a commentary on Chengshi lun in 16 scrolls by Dojang from Baekje became a paradigm of the studies of Chengshi lun in Japanese Buddhism. Dojang’s Commentary had been studied mainly in the school of San lun of Dodaiji until the Kamakura period. In that period, it became spread widely. Through the fragments of Dojang’s Commentary we can see that this process reflects fairly the importance of Dojang’s appropriation of the studies of Chengshi lun, Nirvana Sutra, Dashabhumika Shastras, Tien-Tai thought, and Buddhist precepts in Liang dynasty of China. This can also shed light upon the academic situation of Baekje Buddhism in the time of Dojang in addition to the academic situation of Japanese Buddhism until 8the Century.

Abstract

We can hardly find historical sources for investigating the Buddhist thought in Baekje period, even most of them depending upon sources from China and Japan. This article purports to further the study of the Buddhist thought in that period through presenting some fragments of Dojang’s Commentary on Chengshi lun in that period and investigating its historical significance. In Baekje period, it is surmised that there had been some studies of Lotus Sutra and Nirvana Sutra in addition to the spreading of the studies of Buddhist precepts. Buddhist studies in Baekje are thought to have been transmitted to Japan and to have greatly prompted the early development of studies on Buddhist precepts and San lun. Especially, the writing of a commentary on Chengshi lun in 16 scrolls by Dojang from Baekje became a paradigm of the studies of Chengshi lun in Japanese Buddhism. Dojang’s Commentary had been studied mainly in the school of San lun of Dodaiji until the Kamakura period. In that period, it became spread widely. Through the fragments of Dojang’s Commentary we can see that this process reflects fairly the importance of Dojang’s appropriation of the studies of Chengshi lun, Nirvana Sutra, Dashabhumika Shastras, Tien-Tai thought, and Buddhist precepts in Liang dynasty of China. This can also shed light upon the academic situation of Baekje Buddhism in the time of Dojang in addition to the academic situation of Japanese Buddhism until 8the Century.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 최연식, "백제 찬술문헌으로서의 ≪大乘四論玄義記≫", 한국사연구, (136), pp.1~27 (2007), 한국사연구회
  2. 최연식, "≪大乘四論玄義記≫ 百濟撰述 再論김성철 교수의 반론에 대한 비판", 한국사연구, (138), pp.255~289 (2007), 한국사연구회
  3. J?g Plassen, "On the significance of the Daeseung saron hyeonui gi 大乘四論玄義記 for research on early Korean Buddhist thought―Some initial observations focusing on hwajaeng―", 한국사연구, (136), pp.29~56 (2007), 한국사연구회
  4. 조경철, "백제불교사의 전개와 정치변동", 박사, 역사, pp.2006
  5. 河上麻由子, "遣隋使と仏敎", 日本歷史, (717), pp.1~16 (2008)
  6. 凝然, "律宗綱要(T74, 17bc)", ~
  7. 筒井英校, "東大寺要録 巻5", pp.158~ (1979), 国書刊行会
  8. 金仁徳, "百濟의 三論 高僧", 韓國佛敎學, (22), pp.40~67 (1997)
  9. 김동화, "百濟佛敎의 佛敎思想", 아세아연구, 5(1), pp.57~85 (1962)
  10. "三国仏法伝通縁起(大日本仏教全書 101, 120上)", ~
  11. 石井公成, "講座 仏教の受容と変容 韓国編", pp.71~85 (1991)
  12. 平井俊栄, "中国般若思想史研究-吉蔵と三論学派", pp.178~ (1976), 春秋社
  13. 荒井裕明, "三論教学と仏教思想", pp.68~ (2000), 春秋社
  14. 石井公成, "聖德太子 「憲法十七條」の「和」の源流", 天台學, (10), pp.44~46 (2007)
  15. 新国訳大蔵経, "『成実論』 解題" (1999), 大藏出版
  16. "続高僧伝(T50, 523c)", ~
  17. "『元亨釈書』 卷九(大日本仏教全書101, 106上)", ~
  18. "中国・日本経典章疏目録", pp.359~ (1999), 大東出版社
  19. 法琳, "辯正論(T52, 549c)", ~
  20. "佛書解説大辭典", ~
  21. "『成實論』 「四大仮名品」(T32, 261c)", ~
  22. "新國譯大藏經 6", 147~
  23. 貞海, "三論玄義鈔(T70, 507c)", ~
  24. 智者大師説, "菩薩戒義疏(T40, 571c)", ~
  25. "止觀輔行傳弘決(T46, 418c)", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (2건)