Puṇya-sūtra of the Ekottarikāgama in Comparison with the Fu-jing 福經 of the Chinese Madhyamāgama
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The school affiliation of the Chinese Madhyamāgama is one of the remaining unsolved questions in the field of Buddhist studies, and will remain unsolved, as long as the material basis does not change fundamentally. Nonetheless, the unexpected finds of the Ekottarikaand Dirghāgama manuscripts from Gilgit at the end of the last millennium and recent results of research on the manuscripts allow us for the first time to make a direct comparison of two sūtras with their counterparts in the Chinese Madhyamāgama at full length. A precise comparison between Puṇya-sūtra of the Ekottarikāgama and Fu-jing 福經 on the one hand, and between Śrutānṛśaṃsa-sūtra of the Dīrghāgama and Wende-jing 聞德經 on the other, will illustrate differences and similarities of the texts in concern. It might further contribute to a critical review of prevailing opinions on the relationship between the Chinese Madhyamāgama and the Sarvāstivāda tradition in general.
Abstract
The school affiliation of the Chinese Madhyamāgama is one of the remaining unsolved questions in the field of Buddhist studies, and will remain unsolved, as long as the material basis does not change fundamentally. Nonetheless, the unexpected finds of the Ekottarikaand Dirghāgama manuscripts from Gilgit at the end of the last millennium and recent results of research on the manuscripts allow us for the first time to make a direct comparison of two sūtras with their counterparts in the Chinese Madhyamāgama at full length. A precise comparison between Puṇya-sūtra of the Ekottarikāgama and Fu-jing 福經 on the one hand, and between Śrutānṛśaṃsa-sūtra of the Dīrghāgama and Wende-jing 聞德經 on the other, will illustrate differences and similarities of the texts in concern. It might further contribute to a critical review of prevailing opinions on the relationship between the Chinese Madhyamāgama and the Sarvāstivāda tradition in general.
참고문헌 (34)
- "AN = Aṅguttara-nikāya, ed. R. Morris, E. Hardy, 5 vols., London, 1885–1900 (PTS); vol. 6 (Indexes, by M. Hunt, C.A.F. Rhys Davids) London, 1910 (PTS)", ~
- F. Edgerton, "Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit Grammar and Dictionary, vol. 2: Dictionary" (1953)
- F. Edgerton, "Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit Grammar and Dictionary, Vol. 1: Grammar" (1953)
- A.W. Barber, "The Tibetan Tripiṭaka 72 vols" (1991)
- G. Melzer, "Ein Abschnitt aus dem Dīrghāgama" (2010)
- "Ekottarāgama-Fragmente der Gilgit-Handschrift, hrsg. und bearbeitet von Ch" (1995)
- R. Vira, "Gilgit Buddhist Manuscripts 10 vols" (1959)
- E. Windisch, "Itivuttaka" (1889)
- Saṃghadeva, "Zhong-ahanjing", -ehanjing, pp.26(1), 421~809
- S. Lévi, "Maitreyavyākaraṇa", Chinese Translation of the Madhyamāgama, pp.384~389 (1932)
- N. Dutt, "Gilgit Manuscripts", Calcutta, 4, pp.29ff~185ff (1959)
- Z. Ishigami, "Nepāru bon ‘Maitreyavyākaraṇa’", Fujita Festschrift, 60, pp.295~310
- X. Li, "Maitreyavyākaraṇa", ARIRIAB, 16, pp.217~231 (2013)
- "Ārya-maitriyavyākaraṇa", 40, pp.127(1.3)~128(4.7)
- E. Waldschmidt, "Das Mahāparinirvāṇasūtra, Text in Sanskrit und Tibetisch, verglichen mit dem Pāli nebst einer Übersetzung der chinesischen Entsprechung im Vinaya der Mūlasarvāstivādins, auf Grund von Turfan-Handschriften hrsg. und bearbeitet" (1950), Teil I–III
- H. Matsumura, "Mahāsudarśanāvadāna", pp.6~48 (1988), Teil I–III
- D.T. Suzuki, "The Tibetan Tripiṭaka, Peking 168 vols" (1955)
- Jpn. Zō-agongyō, "kyō; a Chinese Translation of the Saṃyuktāgama by Guṇabhadra", 99(2), pp.1~373
- E. Waldschmidt, "Sanskrithandschriften aus den Turfanfunden" (1985)
- D. Andersen, "Suttanipāta" (1913)
- L. Feer, "Saṃyutta-nikāya 5 vols vol. 6" (1904)
- H. Bechert, "Sanskrit-Wörterbuch der buddhistischen Texte aus den Turfan- Funden" (1973), Göttingen
- "Taishō shinshū daizōkyō or Taishō issaikyō, 100 vols" (1924)
- K.R. Norman, "Thera- and Therī-Gāthā" (1966)
- F. Bernhard, "Udānavarga 2 vols" (1965), Göttingen
- Kishino, "Vinayanidāna", pp.98~316 (2014)
- Bandurski, Frank, "Untersuchungen zur buddhistischen Literatur", pp.9~126 (1994)
- Chung, Jin-il, "A Survey of the Sanskrit Fragments Corresponding to the Chinese Madhyamāgama: Including References to Sanskrit Parallels, Citations, Numerical Categories of Doctrinal Concepts, and Stock Phrases", ~ (2011)
- Harrison, Paul, "From Birch Bark to Digital Data: Recent Advances in Buddhist Manuscript Research", Papers Presented at the Conference Indic Buddhist Manuscripts: The State of the Field, Stanford (2009), Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften
- Hartmann, Jens-Uwe, "The Manuscript of the Dīrghāgama and the Private Collection in Virginia", Harrison and Hartmann, pp.137~156 (2014)
- Kishino, Ryōji, "A Study of the Nidāna: An Underrated Canonical Text of the Mūlasarvāstivāda-vinaya", 박사, pp.2013
- Matsumura, Hisashi, "The Mahāsudarśanāvadāna and the Mahāsudarśanasūtra" (1988), Bibliotheca Indo-Buddhica 47
- Mizuno, Kōgen, "The Chinese Versions of the Madhyamāgama-sūtra and of the Ekottarāgama-sūtra", Buddhist Studies, 18, pp.1~41 (1989)
- Sakamoto-Gotō, "Das Udayajātaka", Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens, 28, pp.45~66 (1984)