한중간 단오문화유산 논쟁의 내용분석연구 -인터넷 상의 논쟁내용을 중심으로-
A Study on Dispute of Dano Festival with Korean and Chinese Netizen: Case Study on Internet Content Analysis
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This thesis, on the case study of the debate on “Dano cultural heritage” between Korean and Chinese internet users, tried to find out construction elements during the process of Korean-Chinese cross-cultural communication, and discussed if there were any difference in understanding this issues between the two countries. The research is limited in the relative debate on certain websites of the two countries: Korea (daum, yahoo, naver in Korea), China(sina, sohu, yahoo in Chinese), which are the most popular websites in each countries. The research decomposes the debate on 7 dimensions: Historical, political, cultural heritage, self-ethnocentric, economic, Confucius and original understanding. During the analysis on the debate from these 7 kinds of understanding, the research found the difference in understanding on the debate of “Dano cultural heritage” between the two countries’ people. This research is helpful to understand correctly and in depth the International communication of Korea and China.
Abstract
This thesis, on the case study of the debate on “Dano cultural heritage” between Korean and Chinese internet users, tried to find out construction elements during the process of Korean-Chinese cross-cultural communication, and discussed if there were any difference in understanding this issues between the two countries. The research is limited in the relative debate on certain websites of the two countries: Korea (daum, yahoo, naver in Korea), China(sina, sohu, yahoo in Chinese), which are the most popular websites in each countries. The research decomposes the debate on 7 dimensions: Historical, political, cultural heritage, self-ethnocentric, economic, Confucius and original understanding. During the analysis on the debate from these 7 kinds of understanding, the research found the difference in understanding on the debate of “Dano cultural heritage” between the two countries’ people. This research is helpful to understand correctly and in depth the International communication of Korea and China.
참고문헌 (24)
- 陈尚胜, "中韩交流三千年" (1997), 中华书局出版
- 김남일, "지역개발전략으로서 지역축제의 생산구조 및 그 효과에 관한 연구: 강릉단오제를 사례로", 박사, pp.2005
- 이규태, "현대한중관계론" (2007), 범한서적주식회사
- 高丙中, "作为公共文化的非物质文化遗产" (2008), 文化研究
- 박진태, "한ㆍ중 단오제의 비교 연구", 비교민속학, (37), pp.77~106 (2008), 비교민속학회
- 노태돈, "한ㆍ중간의 역사분쟁", 사회과학연구원 기획 집담회“인문-자연과학과의 대화” (2008)
- 황남미, "강릉단오제의 한국선도적해석" (2005), 국제평화대학원대
- 중국 근대화 과정에서의 公ㆍ私의 이중 변주: ‘동서문화논쟁’을 중심으로, "박재술", 한국철학사상연구회, ~ (2004)
- 中國 中心의 普遍性, 西歐 中心의 特殊性: 1930年代의 文化論爭을 중심으로, "이병인", 한국중국현대사 연구회, ~ (2000)
- 陳序經, "中国文化的出路" (1997), 牧童出版社
- 熊梦飞, "谈‘中国本位文化建设’之闲天", ~
- 王青云, "谈‘中国本位的文化建设’问题", ~
- 关世杰, "跨文化交流学" (2002), 北京大学出版社