‘저온호황’의 출현과 아베노믹스의 방향전환
The emergence of ‘a weak boom’ and turning point of Abenomics
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Five years have passed since the three arrows of Abenomics were released as a: bold monetary policy, flexible fiscal policy and growth strategy to encourage private investment. The Japanese economy has gradually started to recover and is finally beginning to see signs of recovering from long-term stagnation. However, the depreciation of the yen and the rise in stock prices are not only affected by Abenomics, but is also sensitive to the international situation. Decrease in the unemployment rate is largely due to changes in population structure rather than Abenomics. Besides, the declining population reduces the potential growth rate. Wages do not rise in spite of labor shortage and private consumption does not increase at all. As a result, Abenomics has brought about a weak boom. Focusing on the problem of an aggregate demand shortage, the first Abenomics that tried to induce reflation through quantitative easing revealed certain limitations. The second stage of Abenomics that appeared in 2016 was summarized as a growth strategy centered on work style reform to solve the problem of aggregate supply constraint. After all, the success of Abenomics in the future depends on whether the Japanese labor reform practice persists.
Abstract
Five years have passed since the three arrows of Abenomics were released as a: bold monetary policy, flexible fiscal policy and growth strategy to encourage private investment. The Japanese economy has gradually started to recover and is finally beginning to see signs of recovering from long-term stagnation. However, the depreciation of the yen and the rise in stock prices are not only affected by Abenomics, but is also sensitive to the international situation. Decrease in the unemployment rate is largely due to changes in population structure rather than Abenomics. Besides, the declining population reduces the potential growth rate. Wages do not rise in spite of labor shortage and private consumption does not increase at all. As a result, Abenomics has brought about a weak boom. Focusing on the problem of an aggregate demand shortage, the first Abenomics that tried to induce reflation through quantitative easing revealed certain limitations. The second stage of Abenomics that appeared in 2016 was summarized as a growth strategy centered on work style reform to solve the problem of aggregate supply constraint. After all, the success of Abenomics in the future depends on whether the Japanese labor reform practice persists.
참고문헌 (18)
- 経済政策アベノミクスの評価における２つの盲点-期待依存と円安依存の限界, "岡部光明", 3~6, pp.SFCディスカッション・ペーパ 2014-005 (2014)
- 玄田有史, "人手不足なのになぜ賃金が上がらないのか", pp.1~306 (2017), 慶応義塾大学出版会
- アベノミクスの経済政策, "谷口洋志", 中央大学経済研究所, 1~2, pp.中央大学経済研究所ディスカッション・ペーパ No.250 (2015)
- "東洋経済 6649号 2016年3月26日発売", 54~57 (2016)
- 中名生隆, "構造改革を進めるために", 知的資産創造, pp.4~7 (2003), 野村総合研究所
- 藤田勉, "安倍晋三の経済政策を読む", pp.10~221 (2006), インデックス・コミュニケーション
- リチャード・ク-, "밸런스시트 불황으로 본 세계 경제", pp.16~111 (2014), 어문학사
- 류상윤, "추가 양적완화 이후 아베노믹스, 넘어야 할 리스크들", LG Business Insight, pp.25~26 (2014), LG경제연구원
- 박상준, "불황터널: 진입하는 한국 탈출하는 일본", pp.60~119 (2016), 매경출판
- 박영준, "일본 아베 정부의 안보정책 변화와 한국의 대응방안: 수정주의적 내셔널리즘과 보통군사국가화", 국방정책연구, 30(1), pp.87~121 (2014), 한국국방연구원[DOI]
- 송석원, "아베노믹스 1년의 평가와 한국경제", 한림일본학 (구 한림일본학연구), (23), pp.253~280 (2013), 일본학연구소
- 이정환, "아베노믹스와 소비세 인상 연기의 정치과정", 국제정치논총, 56(3), pp.229~261 (2016), 한국국제정치학회
- 이창민, "아베노믹스를 통해 바라 본 내수경기 활성화를 위한 정책과제", 예산춘추, 45, pp.39~ (2016), 국회예산정책처
- 정진영, "마이너스 금리 시대 도래, 의미와 파장은?", POSRI 이슈리포트, pp.6~ (2016), POSCO 경영연구원
- 최희식, "아베노믹스의 정치경제학:정책과 ‘잠복된 갈등’", 의정연구, 19(3), pp.177~185 (2013), 한국의회발전연구회
- 한국금융연구원, "아베노믹스 2탄(새로운 세 개의 화살) 발표 및 평가", 금융브리프, 24(44), pp.20~ (2015)
- Hayashi, Fumio, "The 1990s in Japan: A Lost Decade", Review of Economic Dynamics, 5, pp.206~235 (2002)
- Krugman, Paul R., "It’s baaack:Japan’s Slump and the Return of the Liquidity Trap", Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1998(2), pp.137~205 (1998)