본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일본 근대여성문학 연구의 성과와 비전

Achievement and Vision of Studies on Modern Japanese Women’s Literature

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

本論文は、韓国における日本近代女性文学研究の特徴と成果を確認したうえで更に研究の限界と課題まで考察することにより、日本近代女性文学の功罪を考えた。 1980年代半ば日本文学研究にフェミニズム批評が適用され、ジェンダーという有用な分析概念の導入されることにより日本近代女性文学研究の新たな地平が開かれた。現在韓国における文学研究は、作家論や作品論が優位を占めつつも、女性文学、慰安婦など性暴力問題、戦争とジェンダーなどの研究も進められている。しかしその研究動向の大部分が日本の動向と類似しているという限界があり、今後の女性文学研究はより多角的かつ多様な視点と方法が求められている。 一方、女性文学をめぐる議論の口火を切るうえでは、女性によって創作された文学を女性文学研究と限定するよりも、「女性」という立場を守りつつも(男性)文学研究との位置づけをする必要がある。さらには、女性文学、女性文学史が必要であるかという疑問にたいしては、女性文学と女性文学史のゲットー化の危険性よりも、男性中心の自国文学史を克服するための代案という点において現在も有効であると思われる。

Abstract

This paper aimed to think about achievement and error of studies on modern Japanese women’s literature, by examining Japanese women’s literature and characteristics and achievement of studies on it in Korea and furthermore considering limits and vision of them. As the feminist criticism was applied to Japanese literature researches and the useful analytical concept of gender was introduced, a new horizon of studies on modern Japanese women’s literature was opened up. In Korea, studies on authors and works are currently dominant, while media and women’s literature, sexual violence problems such as sexual slavery, wars and gender have been also studied. Most of studies, however, have a limit, in that they tend to be similar with those conducted in Japan. It is the time when multilateral and various views and methods are required for follow-up studies on women’s literature. Meanwhile, the ignition of discussion on women’s literature stressed that it is necessary to maintain the stance of ‘women’ and simultaneously establish the relationship with (men’s) literature researches, rather than defining only literature produced by women as targets of women’s literature researches. Moreover, in regard to whether women’s literature and the history of it should exist, the existence of them is thought to be still valid, since they may be alternatives for overcoming the men-centered history of national literature, rather than have a risk of ghettoisation.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. 岩淵宏子, "日本近代文学研究の方法", pp.174~ (2017)
  2. 岩淵宏子, "はじめて学ぶ日本女性文学史 近現代編", pp.24~ (2005), ミネルヴァ書房
  3. 菅聡子, "女が国家を裏切るときー女学生、一葉、吉屋信子", pp.179~275 (2011), 岩波書店
  4. 水田宗子, "女性文学を学ぶ人のために", pp.12~13 (2000), 世界思想社
  5. 山中正樹, "日本語日本文学", pp.2~ (2015), 創価大学日本語日本文学会
  6. 早川紀子, "植民地と戦争責任", pp.156~ (2005), 吉川弘文館
  7. 오성숙, "らいてうの「峠」論", 일본연구, (41), pp.167~187 (2009), 일본연구소[DOI]
  8. 김주영, "일본근대문학의 여성문학 형성과정과계보에 관한 조사연구", 비교문학, (39), pp.53~75 (2006), 한국비교문학회
  9. 김화영, "근대와 ?女性?의 문제", 일본어문학, (39), pp.275~294 (2007), 일본어문학회[DOI]
  10. 손지연, "근대 일본 미디어에 나타난 신여성 논의의 지형", 여성문학연구, (27), pp.241~270 (2012), 한국여성문학학회[DOI]
  11. 오성숙, "일본여성문학자의 ‘문예위문’과 전쟁책임", 일어일문학연구, 105(2), pp.127~146 (2018), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]
  12. 이경하, "문학사를 다시 생각한다", pp.219~ (2018), 소명출판
  13. 이상복, "프롤레타리아문학의 해방운동 서사 ‒「1932년의 봄」과 「시시각각」을 중심으로‒", 일본근대학연구, (56), pp.127~142 (2017), 한국일본근대학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)