표상을 넘어 자기-촉발로: 데카르트의 자아에 관한 장-뤽 마리옹의 해석
Beyond representation to auto-affection: A consideration on Jean-Luc Marion’s interpretation about “Descartes’s ego”
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Traditonally, Descartes’s ego that implicit in his primary metaphysical principle-cogito ergo sum-, has often been interpreted through Heidegger’s view. His interpretation considered Descartes’s ego as a being to dominate the world through the representing activity. Some postmodern philosophers are based on Heidegger’s this point. So such thinkers are aimed at overcoming Descartes’s theory of the subject. Is such an understanding justifiable? I disagree strongly with it. So in this paper, main idea is to criticize Heidegger’s such interpretation of Descartes. In this regard, we must rely on the French Philosopher Jean-Luc Marion to embody our theme. Marion has re-read Descartes’s Passions of the Soul. Beyond mere reading, through his reading of the Passions of the Soul, Marion has interpreted not the primary metaphysical principle but the ego of auto-affection concerning Descarte’s ego. According to Marion, ego become an existential being with an ethical-axiological aim by his auto-affection. The ego is no longer a subject who represents the world. In this interpretation, Descartes’s ego cannot be understood only as a metaphysical subject. Thus this ego must be recognized as an existential-volitional ego with axiological aims. Throughout this study, we will encounter with a new understanding of Descartes’ ego.
Abstract
Traditionally, Descartes’s ego that implicit in his primary metaphysical principle-cogito ergo sum-, has often been interpreted through Heidegger’s view. His interpretation considered Descartes’s ego as a being to dominate the world through the representing activity. Some postmodern philosophers are based on Heidegger’s this point. So such thinkers are aimed at overcoming Descartes’s theory of the subject. Is such an understanding justifiable? I disagree strongly with it. So in this paper, main idea is to criticize Heidegger’s such interpretation of Descartes. In this regard, we must rely on the French Philosopher Jean-Luc Marion to embody our theme. Marion has re-read Descartes’s Passions of the Soul. Beyond mere reading, through his reading of the Passions of the Soul, Marion has interpreted not the primary metaphysical principle but the ego of auto-affection concerning Descarte’s ego. According to Marion, ego become an existential being with an ethical-axiological aim by his auto-affection. The ego is no longer a subject who represents the world. In this interpretation, Descartes’s ego cannot be understood only as a metaphysical subject. Thus this ego must be recognized as an existential-volitional ego with axiological aims. Throughout this study, we will encounter with a new understanding of Descartes’ ego.
참고문헌 (26)
- 강영안, "주체는 죽었는가" (1996), 문예출판사
- 김상환, "데카르트의 정념론과 그 이후", 기호학 연구, 28, pp.9~50 (2010), 한국기호학회
- 레이먼드 윌리엄스, "키워드" (2010), 민음사
- 성찰, "방법서설", pp.르네 데카르트, 철학의 원리
- 르네 데카르트, "성찰. 자연의 빛에 의한 진리탐구. 프로그램에 대한 주석" (1997), 문예출판사
- 르네 데카르트, "성찰 ② <성찰>에 대한 학자들의 반론과 데카르트의 답변" (2012), 나남출판사
- 르네 데카르트, "철학의 원리" (2002), 아카넷
- 마르틴 하이데거, "숲길" (2008), 나남출판사
- 마르틴 하이데거, "니체와 니힐리즘" (2000), 철학과현실사
- 박치완, "하이데거의 데카르트 해석. ？？세계상의 시대？를 중심으로", 현대유럽철학연구, (15), pp.221~268 (2007), 한국하이데거학회
- 이경희, "데까르뜨의 도덕론에서 관대함과 사랑의 문제", 가톨릭철학, (15), pp.97~126 (2010), 한국가톨릭철학회
- 피에르 테브나즈, "현상학이란 무엇인가" (2011), 그린비출판사
- Cottingham, John, "A Descartes Dictionary" (1993), Blackwell
- Descartes, René, "Le monde. Description du corps humain. Passions de l’âme. Anatomica. Varia" (1986), J. Vrin
- Descartes, René, "OEuvres de Descartes. 7 vol" (1983), J. Vrin
- Descartes, René, "OEuvres de Descartes. 8-1 vol" (1982), J. Vrin
- Descartes, René, "OEuvres de Descartes. 13 vols" (1974), J. Vrin
- Guêroult, Martial, "Descartes selon l’ordre des raisons. 1 vol" (1968), Aubier- Montaign
- Heidegger, Martin, "Die Zeit des Weltbildes" (1976), Klostermann
- Heidegger, Martin, "Nietzsche: Der europäische Nihilismus" (1986), Klostermann
- Heller, Agnes, "Can Modernity Survive?" (1990), Polity Press
- Marion, Jean-Luc, "Heidegger et la situation métaphysique de Descartes", Bulletin cartésien IV. Archives de philosophie, 38(2), pp.253~263 (1975)
- Marion, Jean-Luc, "Questions cartésiennes: Méthode et métaphysique" (1991), Presses Universitaires de France
- Rodis-Lewis, Geneviéve, "Le dernier fruit de la métaphysique cartésienne: La générosité", Les etudes philosophiques, pp.43~54 (1987)
- Thévenaz, Pierre, "De Husserl à Merleau-Ponty: Qu’est-ce que la phénoménologie?" (1966), Éditions de la Baconnière
- Williams, Lamond, "Keywords" (1985), Oxford UP