본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

감시: 기술과 예술 사이의 비디오

The Surveillance: Video between Technic and Art

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

Today we live in society of surveillance. Many CCTVs in society are a very familiar scene of contemporary cities. The reason why the theme of surveillance is interesting for us is that it is the best example showing us the ambivalent position of the video between art and technic. The purpose of this article is to make clear the relation of these two different practices of video: CCTV as a technical usage of the video and video art as an aesthetic appropriation of the video. First of all, we examine surveillance as a principal technology of modern power of politics. Studying the society of discipline of Foucault and the society of control of Deleuze, we pursue the development and change of the technology of surveillant power from panopticon to CCTV. What is then the strategy of a video art opposed to the incorporeal power of CCTV? Even though it uses the same technical mechanism of CCTV, video art suspends the flux of this mechanism for creating a space of critical thinking. In this context, we analyze the video works of Joan Jonas, Peter Campus, Dan Graham, and Bruce Nauman. Finally, with regard to the interpretation of their works, we point out the insufficiency of the model of active and participative spectator, and propose the model of suspension and thinking for arguing that the video art is a moment to make CCTV recover its consciousness of self.

Abstract

Today we live in society of surveillance. Many CCTVs in society are a very familiar scene of contemporary cities. The reason why the theme of surveillance is interesting for us is that it is the best example showing us the ambivalent position of the video between art and technic. The purpose of this article is to make clear the relation of these two different practices of video: CCTV as a technical usage of the video and video art as an aesthetic appropriation of the video. First of all, we examine surveillance as a principal technology of modern power of politics. Studying the society of discipline of Foucault and the society of control of Deleuze, we pursue the development and change of the technology of surveillant power from panopticon to CCTV. What is then the strategy of a video art opposed to the incorporeal power of CCTV? Even though it uses the same technical mechanism of CCTV, video art suspends the flux of this mechanism for creating a space of critical thinking. In this context, we analyze the video works of Joan Jonas, Peter Campus, Dan Graham, and Bruce Nauman. Finally, with regard to the interpretation of their works, we point out the insufficiency of the model of active and participative spectator, and propose the model of suspension and thinking for arguing that the video art is a moment to make CCTV recover its consciousness of self.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. Campus, Peter, "Mem", Video installation. Web, ~ (1974)
  2. Debord, Guy, "La société du spectacle" (1992), Gallimard
  3. Deleuze, Gilles, "Pourparlers", pp.229~239 (1990), Editions de Minuit
  4. Debord, Guy, "Pourparlers", pp.240~247 (1990), Editions de Minuit
  5. Foucault, Michel, "Dits et écrits II: 1976-1988", pp.1001~1020 (2001), Editions Gallimard
  6. Foucault, Michel, "Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison" (1975), Editions Gallimard
  7. Graham, Dan, "Present Continuous Past(s)", Video installation. Web, ~ (1974)
  8. Graham, Dan, "Illuminating Video: An Essential Guide to Video Art", pp.168~188 (1990), Aperture
  9. Javault, Patrick, "Vidéo topiques: Tours et retours de l’art vidéo" (2002), Paris-Musées
  10. Jonas, Joan, "Vertical Roll", Video installation. Web, ~ (1972)
  11. Nauman, Bruce, "Live Taped Video Corridor", Video installation. Web, ~ (1970)
  12. Parfait, Françoise, "Vidéo: Un art contemporain" (2001), Editions du Regard
  13. Razac, Olivier, "Avec Foucault, après Foucault: Disséquer la société de contrôle" (2008), L’Harmattan
  14. Rush, Michael, "Video Art" (2007), Thames & Hudson

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)