Human Dignity and the Ethics of Human Enhancement
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Human dignity supports the equal value of all humans and their ethical treatment. While human rights conventions use the term frequently, it is rarely defined. The term dignity is used differently, and two dimensions are described in detail. Inherent dignity is an intrinsic dimension held by all humans and is the basis of equal rights for all humans. Circumstantial dignity is another dimension, but is variable and changeable. This is in mind when circumstances are said to enhance or diminish someone’s dignity. The recent critique of dignity arises in part because of conflation of these two dimensions. Others reject dignity because of its religious connections. Such criticisms will be responded to in defense of dignity. Posthuman and transhuman enhancement also raise questions about the value of dignity because of its roots in humanism. Nick Bostrom defends posthuman dignity while critiquing Leon Kass’s bioconservative position. Bostrom’s argument will be critiqued because of his failure to distinguish between inherent and circumstantial dignity, and his misunderstanding of Kass’s claims. In contrast to the transhumanist enhancement project, inherent dignity points to the givenness and limitations of human nature. This indicates the importance of developing gratitude for human nature and avoiding an endless pursuit of perfection. Such an approach is not antagonistic to medicine and science. Instead, it places priority on improving the circumstantial dignity of all human beings, especially those who live without their basic needs being met. Their inherent dignity places a moral obligation on those with resources to help them. Medicine and science should focus on relieving their needs, not enhancing those who already have most needs met. Justice for all humans based on their inherent dignity is proposed as a significant argument against the ethics of transhuman enhancement.
Abstract
Human dignity supports the equal value of all humans and their ethical treatment. While human rights conventions use the term frequently, it is rarely defined. The term dignity is used differently, and two dimensions are described in detail. Inherent dignity is an intrinsic dimension held by all humans and is the basis of equal rights for all humans. Circumstantial dignity is another dimension, but is variable and changeable. This is in mind when circumstances are said to enhance or diminish someone’s dignity. The recent critique of dignity arises in part because of conflation of these two dimensions. Others reject dignity because of its religious connections. Such criticisms will be responded to in defense of dignity. Posthuman and transhuman enhancement also raise questions about the value of dignity because of its roots in humanism. Nick Bostrom defends posthuman dignity while critiquing Leon Kass’s bioconservative position. Bostrom’s argument will be critiqued because of his failure to distinguish between inherent and circumstantial dignity, and his misunderstanding of Kass’s claims. In contrast to the transhumanist enhancement project, inherent dignity points to the givenness and limitations of human nature. This indicates the importance of developing gratitude for human nature and avoiding an endless pursuit of perfection. Such an approach is not antagonistic to medicine and science. Instead, it places priority on improving the circumstantial dignity of all human beings, especially those who live without their basic needs being met. Their inherent dignity places a moral obligation on those with resources to help them. Medicine and science should focus on relieving their needs, not enhancing those who already have most needs met. Justice for all humans based on their inherent dignity is proposed as a significant argument against the ethics of transhuman enhancement.
참고문헌 (31)
- Annas, George J., "Science Fiction and Philosophy:From Time Travel to Superintelligence", pp.227~240 (2009), Wiley-Blackwell
- Beckwith, Francis J, "Dignity Never Been Photographed: Scientific Materialism, Enlightenment Liberalism, and Steven Pinker", Ethics & Medicine, 26(2), pp.93~110 (2010)
- Bostrom, Nick, "Two Hundred Years After Kant, Fifty Years After Turing", pp.339~371 (2004), Ria University Press
- Bostrom, Nick, "In Defense of Human Dignity", Bioethics, 19(3), pp.202~214 (2005)
- Bostrom, Nick, "Medical Enhancement and Posthumanity", pp.107~136 (2008), Springer
- Bostrom, Nick, "New Waves in Applied Ethics", pp.120~152 (2007), Palgrave Macmillan
- Cheshire, William, "Toward a Common Language of Human Dignity", Ethics & Medicine, 18(2), pp.7~10 (2002)
- "Global Health Workforce Alliance. Adding Value to Health" (2010)[URL]
- "The Birth-Mark, In President’s Council on Bioethics" (2003)[URL]
- Kateb, George, "Human Dignity" (2011), Harvard University Press
- Lee, Patrick, "The Nature and Basis of Human Dignity", Ratio Juris, 21(2), pp.173~193 (2008)
- Habermas, Jürgen, "Time of Transitions" (2006), Polity
- Horton, Richard, "Rediscovering Human Dignity", Lancet, 364, pp.1081~1085 (2004)
- Kass, Leon, "Ageless Bodies, Happy Souls: Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Perfection", The New Atlantis, 1, pp.9~28 (2003)
- Lewis, Milton, "Perspectives on Human Dignity: A Conversation", pp.93~105 (2007), Springer
- Macklin, Ruth, "Dignity Is a Useless Concept", BMJ, 327, pp.1419~1420 (2003)
- Meilaender, Gilbert, "Neither Beast nor God: The Dignity of the Human Person" (2009), Encounter Books
- O’Mathúna, Dónal P., "The Place of Dignity in Everyday Ethics", Journal of Christian Nursing, 28(1), pp.12~18 (2011)
- O’Mathúna, Dónal P, "Taking a Precautionary Approach to Nanotechnology", Nanotechnology Development, 1(e6), pp.26~30 (2011)
- O’Mathúna, Dónal P., "Nanoethics: Big Ethical Issues with Small Technology" (2009), Continuum Press
- "Giovanni. Oration on the Dignity of Man"[URL]
- "The Stupidity of Dignity" (2008)[URL]
- Seidel, Asher, "Immortal Passage: Philosophical Speculations on Posthuman Evolution" (2010), Rowman & Littlefield
- Sulmasy, Daniel P, "Perspectives on Human Dignity: A Conversation", pp.9~18 (2007), Springer
- "Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights" (2005)[URL]
- "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" (1948)[URL]
- "International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights" (1966)[URL]
- "International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and International Covenant" (1966)[URL]
- "In the Mind of the Machine"[URL]
- "What is Posthumanism" (2010)[URL]
- Zylinska, Joanna, "Bioethics in the Age of New Media" (2009), MIT Press