본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Linguistic Typology: An Iranian Perspective

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The Iranian languages spoken in Iran reveal a very intriguing typological peculiarity. They all strongly benefit from agreement as a typological parameter. In this paper, I will begin with Comrie (1978) in which he has proposed the five possible language types based on case-marking and verb-agreement and will address the status of several varieties of Kurdish, as well as a dialect of Talyshi and Davani with respect to agreement. I will show that type (d), i.e., the Tripartite system in Comrie’s terminology where S, A, and P each has a distinct marking, and type (e), for which he has not proposed any name but is a type in which A and P are identically marked, are highly productive and stable systems in the mentioned Iranian languages. The observations reported have implications for the notion of type, language change, and linguistic variation.

Abstract

The Iranian languages spoken in Iran reveal a very intriguing typological peculiarity. They all strongly benefit from agreement as a typological parameter. In this paper, I will begin with Comrie (1978) in which he has proposed the five possible language types based on case-marking and verb-agreement and will address the status of several varieties of Kurdish, as well as a dialect of Talyshi and Davani with respect to agreement. I will show that type (d), i.e., the Tripartite system in Comrie’s terminology where S, A, and P each has a distinct marking, and type (e), for which he has not proposed any name but is a type in which A and P are identically marked, are highly productive and stable systems in the mentioned Iranian languages. The observations reported have implications for the notion of type, language change, and linguistic variation.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. Anderson, S, "Aspects of the Theory of Clitics" (2005), Oxford University Press
  2. Capell, A, "A Survey of New Guinea Languages" (1969), University of Sydney Press
  3. Comrie, B, "Ergativity, In Syntactic Typology" (1978), The Harvester Press
  4. Corbett, G, "Agreement: The Range of the Phenomenon and the Principles of the Surrey Database of Agreement", Transactions of the Philological Society, 101, pp.155~202 (2003)
  5. Croft, W, "Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective" (2001), Oxford University Press
  6. Croft, W, "Typology and Universals" (2003), Cambridge University Press
  7. Dixon, W, "The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland" (1972), Cambridge University Press
  8. Dixon, W, "Ergativity" (1994), Cambridge University Press
  9. Fattah, M, "A Generative Grammar of Kurdish", 박사, pp.1997
  10. Greenberg, J, "Language Typology: A Historical and Analytic Overview" (1974), Mouton
  11. Haig, G, "Alignment Change in Iranian Languages: A Construction Grammar Approach" (2008), Mouton de Gruyter
  12. MacKenzie, D, "Kurdish Dialect Studies I" (1961), Oxford University Press
  13. McCarus, E, "A Kurdish Grammar: Descriptive Analysis of the Kurdish of Sulaimaniya, Iraq" (1958), American Council of Learned Societies
  14. McCarus, E, "Kurdish, In The Iranian Languages", pp.587~633 (2009), Routledge
  15. Nichols, J, "Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time" (1992), University of Chicago Press
  16. Payne, J, "The Decay of Ergativity in Pamir Languages", Lingua, 51, pp.147~186 (1980)
  17. Yar-Shater, E, "A Grammar of Southern Tati Dialects" (1969), Mouton

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)