李白 <代壽山答孟少府移文書> 역해
A Translation and Annotation of Libai(李白)’s Answering to Reproach of Meng Shaofu on behalf of Shou Mountain(<代壽山答孟少府移文書>)
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Prose of Li Bai(李白) is a support material to ascertain Li Bai’s life and philosophy and to understand Li Bai’s poetries. It is also a critical material to shed light on his literary ideology and his world of art. But until now studies on Li Bai conducted in the country and abroad are biased towards research and translation on Li Bai’s poetry so its interest in his prose is relatively low. Especially translation comments as a basis of research are marginal. If translation comments of Li Bai’s prose have a progress, it will be one of most important material for research on Li Bai. This prose is the answer to reprimand of Meng Shaofu(孟少府) by personifying Shou Mountain(壽山). It compare that he was talented but he didn’t have a favorable opportunity by expressing that Shou Mountain had no name but it was imposing and graceful. This prose can be divided with four paragraphs. The first paragraph describes topography of Shou Mountain itself by personifying Shou Mountain. The second paragraph responses to reprimand of Meng Shaofu in the light of Taoism, and describes that Shou Mountain wasn’t famous but it did not suffer by comparison with famous mountain. The third paragraph refutes Meng Shaofu’s reprimand that denigrates Shou Mountain by describing that Shou Mountain is the place where sage lives and treasures are hidden. The fourth paragraph explains writer’s ambition and view of living. This prose corresponds to systemic characteristic of Shu(書). Taoism and idealism of this prose to perform a meritorious deed and to live in retirement are revealed by terse speech euphemistically.
Abstract
Prose of Li Bai(李白) is a support material to ascertain Li Bai’s life and philosophy and to understand Li Bai’s poetries. It is also a critical material to shed light on his literary ideology and his world of art. But until now studies on Li Bai conducted in the country and abroad are biased towards research and translation on Li Bai’s poetry so its interest in his prose is relatively low. Especially translation comments as a basis of research are marginal. If translation comments of Li Bai’s prose have a progress, it will be one of most important material for research on Li Bai. This prose is the answer to reprimand of Meng Shaofu(孟少府) by personifying Shou Mountain(壽山). It compare that he was talented but he didn’t have a favorable opportunity by expressing that Shou Mountain had no name but it was imposing and graceful. This prose can be divided with four paragraphs. The first paragraph describes topography of Shou Mountain itself by personifying Shou Mountain. The second paragraph responses to reprimand of Meng Shaofu in the light of Taoism, and describes that Shou Mountain wasn’t famous but it did not suffer by comparison with famous mountain. The third paragraph refutes Meng Shaofu’s reprimand that denigrates Shou Mountain by describing that Shou Mountain is the place where sage lives and treasures are hidden. The fourth paragraph explains writer’s ambition and view of living. This prose corresponds to systemic characteristic of Shu(書). Taoism and idealism of this prose to perform a meritorious deed and to live in retirement are revealed by terse speech euphemistically.
참고문헌 (15)
- 王 琦, "李太白全集" (1977), 中華書局
- 郁賢皓, "李白叢考" (1982), 陝西人民出版社
- 詹 鍈, "李白詩文繫年" (1984), 人民文學
- 牛寶彤, "李白文選" (1989), 學苑出版社
- 安 旗, "李白全集編年注釋" (1990), 巴蜀書社
- 李 白, "李太白文集(宋蜀刻本唐人集叢刊)" (1994), 上海古籍出版社
- 詹 鍈, "李白全集校注匯釋集評" (1996), 百花文藝出版社
- 瞿蛻園, "李白集校注" (1998), 上海古籍出版社
- 謝育爭, "李白散文硏究" (2012), 文津出版社
- 황선재, "이태백 명시문 선집: 시선(詩仙)의 향연" (2013), 박이정
- 朱金城, "論李白的散文", 李白學刊, 1 (1987)
- 林心治, "隋唐五代的巴蜀散文(三)", 渝州大學學報, 18(2) (2001)
- 杨兰凯, "從「代壽山答孟少府移文書」看李白的道家人生哲學", 河南農業, ~ (2008)
- 阮堂明, "亦真亦假, 亦莊亦諧 — 李白「代壽山答孟少府移文書」探微", 孝感學院學報, (5) (2009)
- 신하윤, "李白散文譯註 (Ⅰ) - 書類 <上安州裴長史書>", 중국어문논역총간, (26), pp.591~611 (2010), 중국어문논역학회
