본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

才性論 認識 演變 考察 ― 孔、孟에서 ≪文心雕龍≫에 이르기까지

A Study on the Change of Cognition on JaeSeongRon (才性論: thoughts of talent and nature) ― From Confucius through Mencius to WenXinDiaoLong (文心雕龍)

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

Looking into the existing studies, WenXinDiaoLong has been studied in various fields including MunCheRon (文體論: thoughts of writing style), PungGyeokRon (風格論: thoughts of personality and dignity), JakGaRon (作家 論: thoughts of writers), ideologies and etc. It has already formed its own study field big enough to be called YongHak (龍學: oriental learning about humanism). In philosophical and literary fields, JaeSeongRon and PungGyeokRon have been studied respectively. Especially, JaeSeongRon of Wei Dynasty and talented people recruiting policies of that era have been studied sporadically. However, there are few studies on the essence of JaeSeongRon dealt in WenXinDiaoLong. Therefore, the researcher tried to look into how JaeSeongRon had been realized in WenXinDiaoLong through what kinds of changes from the JaeSeongRon of Confucius and Mencius through the era of the Han and Wèijìn Dynasties to WenXinDiaoLong. Thus, the researcher studied what kind of relation JaeSeongRon had made with literature by looking into the change of cognition on JaeSeongRon setting the scope of this study with the JaeSeongRon dealt in Lùnhéng (論衡) written by Wángchōng, a GiHwa (氣化: energy forming) focused Yin-Yang philosopher of Han Dynasty and that in Báihǔtōng (白虎通) that may have integrated all the academic achievements of that society, and setting the study scope against this study with Rénwùzhì (人物志) written by Liúshào that was used to recruit the talented people in the era of the Wèijìn Dynasties. This study results indicate that Mencius in the time before the Qin Dynasty claimed the talent and nature were same as each other in terms of concept while the JaeSeongRon of the Han Dynasty was influenced by the ideology of GiHwa focused Yin-Yang and Five Elements in the Universe to value the individual person’s born characters and his own specialties. The JaeSeongRon in the era of the Wèijìn Dynasties was focusing more on the individual person’s political talent than his morality. These results show that the JaeSeongRon in the era of the Wèijìn Dynasties was focusing more on political talent so that it tended to become more individualized and materialized particularly than that of the former era. Under this social circumstance of that era, WenXinDiaoLong did not only value the born talent but also the origins and good models of every writing style, so that it helped the literature creation through education based learning. That is why the points focused and valued by Liúxié, Gŭwénjiā (古文 家: the scholar group studying old literature) and Lǐxuéjiā (理學家: the scholar group studying principles) are all different from each other while their points are similar each other generally in terms of the thoughts of literature. That is, the group of Lǐxuéjiā claimed that the literature should agree with the writers’ moral characters focusing on their personalities and morality, so that they valued the writers’ education based personal training. Whereas, Liúxié focused more on the literature aspect and valued the writers’ born talent to claim that the born talent should be implemented by education based learning.

Abstract

Looking into the existing studies, WenXinDiaoLong has been studied in various fields including MunCheRon (文體論: thoughts of writing style), PungGyeokRon (風格論: thoughts of personality and dignity), JakGaRon (作家 論: thoughts of writers), ideologies and etc. It has already formed its own study field big enough to be called YongHak (龍學: oriental learning about humanism). In philosophical and literary fields, JaeSeongRon and PungGyeokRon have been studied respectively. Especially, JaeSeongRon of Wei Dynasty and talented people recruiting policies of that era have been studied sporadically. However, there are few studies on the essence of JaeSeongRon dealt in WenXinDiaoLong. Therefore, the researcher tried to look into how JaeSeongRon had been realized in WenXinDiaoLong through what kinds of changes from the JaeSeongRon of Confucius and Mencius through the era of the Han and Wèijìn Dynasties to WenXinDiaoLong. Thus, the researcher studied what kind of relation JaeSeongRon had made with literature by looking into the change of cognition on JaeSeongRon setting the scope of this study with the JaeSeongRon dealt in Lùnhéng (論衡) written by Wángchōng, a GiHwa (氣化: energy forming) focused Yin-Yang philosopher of Han Dynasty and that in Báihǔtōng (白虎通) that may have integrated all the academic achievements of that society, and setting the study scope against this study with Rénwùzhì (人物志) written by Liúshào that was used to recruit the talented people in the era of the Wèijìn Dynasties. This study results indicate that Mencius in the time before the Qin Dynasty claimed the talent and nature were same as each other in terms of concept while the JaeSeongRon of the Han Dynasty was influenced by the ideology of GiHwa focused Yin-Yang and Five Elements in the Universe to value the individual person’s born characters and his own specialties. The JaeSeongRon in the era of the Wèijìn Dynasties was focusing more on the individual person’s political talent than his morality. These results show that the JaeSeongRon in the era of the Wèijìn Dynasties was focusing more on political talent so that it tended to become more individualized and materialized particularly than that of the former era. Under this social circumstance of that era, WenXinDiaoLong did not only value the born talent but also the origins and good models of every writing style, so that it helped the literature creation through education based learning. That is why the points focused and valued by Liúxié, Gŭwénjiā (古文 家: the scholar group studying old literature) and Lǐxuéjiā (理學家: the scholar group studying principles) are all different from each other while their points are similar each other generally in terms of the thoughts of literature. That is, the group of Lǐxuéjiā claimed that the literature should agree with the writers’ moral characters focusing on their personalities and morality, so that they valued the writers’ education based personal training. Whereas, Liúxié focused more on the literature aspect and valued the writers’ born talent to claim that the born talent should be implemented by education based learning.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 鄭玄, "禮記, 四部叢刊景宋本", ~
  2. 侯外庐, "中国思想通史" (1957), 人民出版社
  3. 刘勰, "文心雕龙" (1958), 人民文学出版社
  4. 朱熹, "四书章句集注" (1983), 中华书局
  5. 高诱, "吕氏春秋" (1985), 上海书店
  6. 王先谦, "荀子集解" (1988), 中华书局
  7. 黄晖, "论衡校释" (1990), 中华书局
  8. 刘宝楠, "论语正义" (1990), 中华书局
  9. 陈立, "白虎通疏证" (1994), 中华书局
  10. 刘劭, "人物志" (1996), 红旗出版社
  11. 刘大傑, "魏晋思想论" (1998), 上海古籍出版社
  12. 冯友兰, "中国哲学史新编" (1998), 人民出版社
  13. 孙星衍, "孔子集语校补" (1998), 齐鲁书社
  14. 牟宗三, "心體與性體" (1999), 上海古籍出版社
  15. 赵岐, "十三经注疏⋅孟子注疏" (1999), 北京大学出版社
  16. 王友怀, "昭明文选注析" (2000), 三秦出版社
  17. 李守奎, "扬子法言译注" (2003), 黑龙江出版社
  18. 劳思光, "新编中国哲学史" (2005), 廣西师範大学出版社
  19. 牟宗三, "才性與玄理" (2006), 廣西师範大学出版社
  20. 伏俊璉, "人物志译注" (2008), 上海古籍出版社
  21. 张建, "文道、才性與心术--<文心雕龙>幾個理论命题及其在中国文论上的地位", 学术研究, (3) (2009)
  22. 朱子撰, "晦庵集, ≪文淵閣钦定四库全书≫电子版", ~
  23. 진명호, "문심조룡과 유가의 인성론 관계 탐구", 중국인문학회 학술대회 발표논문집 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)