본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

≪文心雕龍≫<原道>篇 硏究

A Study on Wenxindiaolong “Yuandao”

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

In the study of literary theory, what kind of method is adopted and the results of the study may be quite different. So the research method is not correct, the result will be hard to be trusted. In my opinion, During the study of the Yuandao of Wenxindiaolong, most scholars reluctantly concluded according to the philosophical contents of Confucianism, Taoism, Zenism and Metaphysics and Liu Xie’s Yuandao words. Therefore, Not the same opinion divergence. In order to correctly grasp the significance of Liu Xie’s literary theory, the author studies his literary experience and theoretical content according to his own theory of ‘talent, spirit, knowledge and practice.’ Through this research, we can get that Liu Xie is not stick to the thought of one school, Instead, it integrates the thinking of each school and the vision of great vision to establish its own system of literary theory. Liu Xie continued to ask the question of literature in the process of building his own theoretical system of literature. How to develop? What are the problems in the literary world? Correct the distortion of literature, etc. Then, Liu Xie recognized the difference of literary between natue language and humanities. Liu Xie believes that literature (generalized Literature) is born and grown-up with the world. From the modern perspective of literary understanding Xie has not yet reached a certain level, contain ambiguity. However, in the exposition of Liu Xie theory, we can find that he has clearly recognized the difference between natural and human. There are two stages of emotional involvement and the use of the diction between nature and humanity. In his discourse on Yuandao, Liu Xie discusses in detail the process of the origin, formation and development of humanism, which means that the basic purpose of Liu Xie’s Yuandao is to clarify the meaning of humanity.

Abstract

In the study of literary theory, what kind of method is adopted and the results of the study may be quite different. So the research method is not correct, the result will be hard to be trusted. In my opinion, During the study of the Yuandao of Wenxindiaolong, most scholars reluctantly concluded according to the philosophical contents of Confucianism, Taoism, Zenism and Metaphysics and Liu Xie’s Yuandao words. Therefore, Not the same opinion divergence. In order to correctly grasp the significance of Liu Xie’s literary theory, the author studies his literary experience and theoretical content according to his own theory of ‘talent, spirit, knowledge and practice.’ Through this research, we can get that Liu Xie is not stick to the thought of one school, Instead, it integrates the thinking of each school and the vision of great vision to establish its own system of literary theory. Liu Xie continued to ask the question of literature in the process of building his own theoretical system of literature. How to develop? What are the problems in the literary world? Correct the distortion of literature, etc. Then, Liu Xie recognized the difference of literary between natue language and humanities. Liu Xie believes that literature (generalized Literature) is born and grown-up with the world. From the modern perspective of literary understanding Xie has not yet reached a certain level, contain ambiguity. However, in the exposition of Liu Xie theory, we can find that he has clearly recognized the difference between natural and human. There are two stages of emotional involvement and the use of the diction between nature and humanity. In his discourse on Yuandao, Liu Xie discusses in detail the process of the origin, formation and development of humanism, which means that the basic purpose of Liu Xie’s Yuandao is to clarify the meaning of humanity.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. "南史" (1992), 中華書局
  2. "梁書" (1992), 中華書局
  3. 南懷瑾, "周易今註今譯" (1986), 臺灣商務印書館
  4. 許 愼 著, "說文解字" (1995), 上海古籍出版社
  5. 鄭 玄, "周禮注" (1988), 中華書局
  6. 黃 侃, "文心雕龍札記" (1947), 臺灣文史哲出版社
  7. 范文瀾, "文心雕龍注" (1982), 臺灣開明書局
  8. 周振甫, "文心雕龍註釋" (1973), 里仁書局
  9. 郭紹虞, "中國歷代文論選" (1982), 中華書局
  10. 尹在根, "文藝美學" (1984), 고려원
  11. 童慶炳, "談文心雕龍" (2008), 河南大學出版社
  12. 周振甫, "文心雕龍今譯" (1988), 中華書局
  13. 童慶炳, "談文心雕龍" (2008)
  14. 張少康, "文心雕龍新探" (1987), 齊魯書社
  15. 牟世金, "文心雕龍硏究" (1995), 人民文學出版社
  16. 童慶炳, "중국 고전문학이론의 이해" (2014), 충북대학교출판사
  17. 許杭生, "魏晋玄學史" (1989), 陝西師範大學出版社
  18. 李澤厚, "中國美學史" (1994), 上海古籍出版社
  19. 蔣祖怡, "文心雕龍論叢" (1985), 上海古籍出版社
  20. 李映山, "文心雕龍硏究" (2007), 第七輯
  21. 郭德茂, "文心雕龍學刊" (1992), 第七輯

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)