ハンナ・アーレント、排除なき複数性のための政治哲学 -判断力理論を手掛かりに-
Hannah Arendt: The Political Philosophy for Plurality without Exclusions―Focusing on her Judgment Theory-
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to explore a radical potentiality of “plurality” in Hannah Arendt’s political thought. Plurality is a consistent theme through her whole thought and it means diversity between men in the public sphere. However, as this conception has been generally considered with the public or political realm, then plurality has been nothing but one among people in privileged positions who can participate in political activities. Therefore in this paper I shall argue the way to overcome this implicit exclusion which has always attached to plurality. For this objective, I focus on the argument regarding “judgment” which Arendt presented in her old age. There is, however, a large question with this concept of judgment in her political thought, and it has bothered many researchers. That is to say, it is “Why there are not one but two theories of judgment in Arendt’s thought?” To this problem, I shall indicate that there is only one theory of judgment in her thought, not two theories, and that the radical dimension of plurality appeared not in the political actor but in the spectator who retreats from such a political action. Through analyzing plurality from this perspective, I would like to clarify that the range of the conception of plurality includes not only “here-now” in public realm, but also the potential others who are not here and the past others who are not now. At the end I conclude by considering the contemporary significance this radicalized plurality will have.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to explore a radical potentiality of “plurality” in Hannah Arendt’s political thought. Plurality is a consistent theme through her whole thought and it means diversity between men in the public sphere. However, as this conception has been generally considered with the public or political realm, then plurality has been nothing but one among people in privileged positions who can participate in political activities. Therefore in this paper I shall argue the way to overcome this implicit exclusion which has always attached to plurality. For this objective, I focus on the argument regarding “judgment” which Arendt presented in her old age. There is, however, a large question with this concept of judgment in her political thought, and it has bothered many researchers. That is to say, it is “Why there are not one but two theories of judgment in Arendt’s thought?” To this problem, I shall indicate that there is only one theory of judgment in her thought, not two theories, and that the radical dimension of plurality appeared not in the political actor but in the spectator who retreats from such a political action. Through analyzing plurality from this perspective, I would like to clarify that the range of the conception of plurality includes not only “here-now” in public realm, but also the potential others who are not here and the past others who are not now. At the end I conclude by considering the contemporary significance this radicalized plurality will have.
참고문헌 (20)
- Arendt, Hannah, "人間の条件" (2001), 筑摩書房
- Arendt, Hannah, "暗い時代の人々" (1995), 河出書房新社
- Arendt, Hannah, "精神の生活 下" (2003), 岩波書店
- Arendt, Hannah, "カント政治哲学の講義" (2000), 法政大学出版局
- Arendt, Hannah, "Philosophy and Politics", Social Research, (Spring) (1990)
- Arendt, Hannah, "過去と未来の間" (1995), みすず書房
- Arendt, Hannah, "全体主義の起原3" (2001), みすず書房
- Beiner, Ronald, "ハンナ・アーレントの判断作用について. in: カント政治哲学の講義" (2000), 法政大学出版局
- Benhabib, Seyla, "The Reluctant Modernism of Hannah Arendt" (1996), Sage Publications
- Bernstein, Richard J., "Philosophical Profiles" (1986), Polity Press
- Bradshaw, Lea, "Acting and Thinking-The Political Thought of Hannah Arendt" (1989), University of Toronto Press
- Canovan, Margaret, "アレント政治思想の再解釈" (2004), 未来社
- D’entrèves, "“Arendt’s theory of Judgment,” in The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt" (2000), Cambridge University Press
- Derrida Jacques, "脱構築とプラグマティズム" (2002), 法政大学出版局
- Heidegger, Martin, "存在と時間" (2001), 筑摩書房
- Kant, Immanuel, "純粋理性批判（上）" (1997), 岩波文庫
- Kateb, George, "Political action: its nature and advantages. in: The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt" (2000), Cambridge University Press
- Mouffe, Chantal, "政治的なるものの再興" (2001), 日本経済評論社
- Tlaba, Gabriel Masooane, "Politics and Freedom" (1987), University of America
- Villa, Dana R., "政治・哲学・恐怖-ハンナ・アレントの思想" (2004), 法政大学出版局