본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

데리다사상과 노장사상의 만남에 대한 또 다른 모색

An Approach on the Contact of the Derrida’s Thought and the Lao-Chuang’s Thought

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

An Approach on the Contact of the Derrida’s Thought and the Lao-Chuang’s Thought Young-Joo Kim (Chodang Univ.) In the East Asian thought the other against the Confucianism is the Lao-Chuang's thought, and in the European thought the other against the Platonism is the Derrida's Deconstructionism. Between the Derrida's thought and the Lao-Chuang's thought, there are some different contents and some similar contents, but the basic root of thought is very similar. - the opening Acceptablity among Differences · the inter-Textuality of Differance and the Hyun in Tao · inter-Relational Monogenesis · Bio-naturalism. It is very important that the Derrida's thought and the Lao-Chuang's thought encounter at this time and this spot across 2500 years and Eurasia continental. But the Derrida's thought was staying at Deconstruction against main stream of European thought and didn't suggest a new thinking vision, and the Lao-Chuang's thought had hung around nihilism and seclusion. Moreover the Derrida's thought is very dizzy and difficult, and the Lao-Chuang's thought is very obscure and bragging. If we will be not escaped from these problems, this meaningful contact will not begin to develop. Therefore we must effort to overcome these problems containing this contact. For this purpose, I will try to approach a method called 'the thinking frame of LiangGeuk and LiangMyun'. It criticise and will overcome the problems rooted in ‘the Western Dichotomy' and ‘the Eastern EumYang'. My thinking frame has similar contents and different contents with the Derrida's thought and the Lao-Chuang's thought. I will try to construct a new contact of the Derrida's thought and the Lao-Chuang's thought with the similar contents, and to overcome the problems of the Derrida's thought and the Lao-Chuang's thought with the different contents.

Abstract

An Approach on the Contact of the Derrida’s Thought and the Lao-Chuang’s Thought Young-Joo Kim (Chodang Univ.) In the East Asian thought the other against the Confucianism is the Lao-Chuang's thought, and in the European thought the other against the Platonism is the Derrida's Deconstructionism. Between the Derrida's thought and the Lao-Chuang's thought, there are some different contents and some similar contents, but the basic root of thought is very similar. - the opening Acceptablity among Differences · the inter-Textuality of Differance and the Hyun in Tao · inter-Relational Monogenesis · Bio-naturalism. It is very important that the Derrida's thought and the Lao-Chuang's thought encounter at this time and this spot across 2500 years and Eurasia continental. But the Derrida's thought was staying at Deconstruction against main stream of European thought and didn't suggest a new thinking vision, and the Lao-Chuang's thought had hung around nihilism and seclusion. Moreover the Derrida's thought is very dizzy and difficult, and the Lao-Chuang's thought is very obscure and bragging. If we will be not escaped from these problems, this meaningful contact will not begin to develop. Therefore we must effort to overcome these problems containing this contact. For this purpose, I will try to approach a method called 'the thinking frame of LiangGeuk and LiangMyun'. It criticise and will overcome the problems rooted in ‘the Western Dichotomy' and ‘the Eastern EumYang'. My thinking frame has similar contents and different contents with the Derrida's thought and the Lao-Chuang's thought. I will try to construct a new contact of the Derrida's thought and the Lao-Chuang's thought with the similar contents, and to overcome the problems of the Derrida's thought and the Lao-Chuang's thought with the different contents.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Derrida, Jacques, "Derrida. De la Grammatologie" (1967), Paris: Minuit
  2. "L'Ecriture et la difference" (1967), Paris: Seuil
  3. "La Voix et le phenomene" (1967), Paris: P.U.F.
  4. "La Dissemination" (1972), Paris: Seuil
  5. "Marges de la philosophie" (1972), Paris: Minuit
  6. "Positions" (1972), Paris: Minuit
  7. 中華書局據華亭張氏本校刊, "老子(影印本)", 保景文化社
  8. "馬王堆漢墓帛書 老子(排印本)" (1976), 文物出版社
  9. "郭店楚墓竹簡 老子" (1998), 文物出版社
  10. 안병주 , 전호근, "譯註 莊子" (2002), 전통문화연구회
  11. 김상환, "해체시대의 철학" (1999), 문학과지성사
  12. 김성곤, "탈모더니즘 시대의 미국문학" (1989), 서울대학교출판부
  13. 김영주, "서양이분법과 동양음양법의 극복", 동양사회사상, 4 (2001)
  14. "동양음양법의 상호관계론적 사색틀과 그 비판", 동양사회사상, 8 (2003)
  15. "데리다사상에 대한 사회과학적 접근", NGO연구, 2(2) (2004)
  16. 김용옥, "노자와 21세기 1·2·3" (2000), 통나무
  17. 김충열, "노자강의" (2004), 예문서원
  18. 김형효, "노장사상의 해체적 독법" (1999), 청계
  19. "데리다의 해체철학" (1993), 민음사
  20. 신영복, "강의" (2006), 돌베게
  21. 소칼, 앨런, "지적 사기" (2000), 민음사
  22. 진고응, "진고응이 풀이한 노자" (2004), 영남대학교출판부
  23. 최진석, "老莊新論" (1997), 소나무
  24. 클레망, 카트린, "악마의 창녀" (2000), 새물결
  25. 노리스, 크리스토퍼, "데리다" (1999), 시공사
  26. 한국도가철학회, "노자에서 데리다까지" (2002), 예문서원
  27. 한국철학회, "한국철학사" (1987), 동명사
  28. 헤드, 화이트, "과정과 실재" (1991), 민음사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)