본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재후보

류성룡의 공익지향의 실용적 리더십 –CIP-sp 모델에 의한 분석

Ryu Seong-Ryong’s Leadership: Analysis from CIP-sp Model - An Excellent Case of Socialized Pragmatic Leadership

백기복
서애학회 (Seo-ae Studies Association)|2021.04|서애연구 (Seo-ae Yongu)|제3권 |pp. 83-135|DOI 10.23244/seoae.2021.3..002

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

리더십서애 류성룡CIP 모델실용적 리더십공익적(사회적)/개인적 권력지향
주제분류사회학

초록

본 연구는, 임진왜란과 정유재란 7년(1592년∼1598년) 동안 병조판서, 영의정, 도체찰사 등의 직책을 가지고 국난을 극복했던 서애 류성룡(西厓 柳成龍) 선생의 리더십을 CIP-sp(Charismatic, Ideological, Pragmatic; socialized, personalized) 모델의 관점에서 평가할 목적으로 수행되었다. 징비록과 선조실록 및 선조수정실록에 기초하여, 류성룡을 (1)인물평가, (2)민심관리, (3)명군대응, (4)군사전략, (5)분석기록 등 다섯 가지 차원에서 계량역사학적(historiomatric) 방법을 사용하여 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 류성룡은 “공익적(사회적) 권력지향의 실용적 리더(socialized pragmatic leader)”였던 것으로 나타났다. 그는 개인적 이득보다는 사회적, 공익적 이익을 위해서 헌신했으며, 카리스마 리더가 추구하는 것과 같은 먼 미래희망보다는 구체적, 실용적 문제에 천착했고, 이념적 리더가 추구하는 신념의 동질성을 추구하기보다는 실용적 리더로서 장기적 관점의 근본적 문제해결에집중했다. 본 연구를 통해서, 위기 상황에서 실용적 리더가 유효할 수 있다는 것을 확인했으며, 위기 속에서는 ‘공익적(사회적) 권력 지향’이 필수적이라는 사실도알게 되었다. 아울러, 계량 역사학적 방법론의 가능성을 다시 한번 확인했으며, 나아가 류성룡의 역사적 가치를 재인식할 수 있었다. 류성룡은 단순히 징비록의 저자가 아니라 우리 역사에서 ‘공익적 실용주의’ 의 기틀을 마련한 위인이라는 결론에 도달하였다. 향후의 연구 방향은, S-N-D-F 모델에 입각한 종합적 조망 연구의 필요성을 역설하였으며, 한국형리더십 8요인을 통한 한국형 리더십의 뿌리 찾기 연구와 ‘두름성’(versatility) 연구, 오늘날의 관료 리더십의 표준 설정 연구, 그리고 류성룡 리더십의 독자영역구축의 필요성 등을 제시하였다.

Abstract

The current study was conducted to evaluate Seoae Ryu Seong-Ryong’s leadership with the CIP-sp(C=Charismatic, I=Ideological, P=Pragmatic; s=socialized, p=personalized) Model as suggested by Michael Mumford in 2006. Ryu Seong-Ryong is a well known politician of ancient Korea, or Chosun Dynasty, who made great contributions in defending Chosun against 7-year-long Japanese invasions between 1592 and 1598, as a prime minster, defence minister, and the Commander-in-Chief. We evaluated Ryu in five categories as in (1) his standard of evaluating other generals, (2) his ability to manage people during the warfare, (3) his method of responding to the Chinese support troups, (4) his perspective in war strategy, and (5) his value manifested in his writings. In conducting the analysis, we have employed the ‘historiometric method’ just like precedent CIP studies had done so. Our analysis was mostly based upon the contents of Jingbirok, or ‘Memoir on War for Generational Lessons’ that Ryu had written, along with formal records of ‘Seonjo Sillok’ and ‘revised Seonjo Sillok’, where Sillok means the formal documents that had been recorded on daily behaviors, decision, and events of 27 Kings of Chosun for 519 years, Seonjo being the King in charge of the War. The results of our analysis revealed that Ryu was “the socialized pragmatic leader” He made sacrificial contributions to the nation not for his own personal interests, but for the sake of public or nation’s interests, put attentional focus on specific and pragmatic problems rather than on some far-reaching future vision, and pursued fundamental solutions from long-term perspective instead of seeking for convictional homogeneity just like ideological leaders often do. In our study it was verified that the pragmatic leader could be effective even during the crisis of war whilst it is a necessity for him/her to have the ‘socialized power orientation.’ The study also gave us an opportunity to recognize both the value of historiometric method and the historical position of Ryu Seong Ryong. We have reached a conclusion that Ryu should be recognized not just as the author of Jinbirok, but as a heroic leader who paved the way to the ‘socialized pragmatism’ in the history of Korea. Future research endeavors would engulf such topics as Ryu’s leadership in view of S-N-D-F model, application of 8 dimensions of Korean-style leadership to the case of Ryu, study on Ryu’s versatility, as well as establishment of Ryu Seong Ryong’s distinctive leadership style. Study limitations were also discussed.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. 류성룡, "징비록" (2001), 사단법인 서애선생기념사업회
  2. 백기복, "청암리더십", 리더십연구, 2(1), pp.3~45 (2010)
  3. 백기복, "리더십리뷰" (2016), 창민사
  4. 백기복, "서애 경세론의 현대적 조망" (2016), 연세대학교 서애학술연구단
  5. 백기복, "계량역사학적 방법(historiometry)을이용한 리더십연구", 리더십연구, 9(2), pp.157~175 (2018), 리더십학회
  6. 백기복, "리더십현장의 패러독스", 리더십연구, 10(3), pp.179~201 (2019), 리더십학회
  7. 백기복, "역사적 위기와 리더십", 한국경영학회 동계발표 (2021)
  8. 백기복, "한국형 리더십", 인사조직연구, 18(4), pp.33~69 (2010), 한국인사조직학회
  9. 백기복, "King Sejong’s Issue Leadership", 리더십연구, 8(4), pp.3~19 (2017), 리더십학회
  10. 백기복, "Can a leader be both pragmatic and ideological?: Answers from King Sejong’s cases", 리더십연구, 9(1), pp.151~166 (2017), 리더십학회
  11. 백기복, "계량역사학적 방법(historiometry)을이용한 리더십연구", 리더십연구, 9(2), pp.157~175 (2018), 리더십학회
  12. Calas, M., "Emerging Leadership Vistas", pp.222~226 (1988), Lexington Books
  13. Collinson, D. L., "‘Only connect!’ : Exploring the critical dialectical turn in leadership studies", Organization Theory, 1, pp.1~22 (2020)
  14. Conger, J. A., "Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings", Academy of Management Review, 12(4), pp.637~647 (1987)
  15. Crotty, M, "The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process" (1998), SAGE Publications Ltd
  16. Galton, F., "Hereditary Genius" (1869), MacMillan & Co
  17. Glaser, B., "The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research" (1967), Aldine
  18. Grabo, A., "Charisma as signal : An evolutionary perspective on charismatic leadership", Leadership Quarterly, 28, pp.473~485 (2017)
  19. Hernandez, M., "The loci and mechanisms of leadership : Exploring a more comprehensive view of leadership theory", Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), pp.1165~1185 (2011)
  20. House, R. J, "Leadership: The cutting edge, Carbondale, Ill", pp.1976~ (1977), Southern Illinois University Press
  21. House, R. J., "Personality and charismatic leadership", Leadership Quarterly, 3, pp.81~108 (1992)
  22. Hunt, J. G., "Out-of-the-box leadership:Transforming the-twenty-first-century army leadership and other top-performing organizations" (1999), Emarald
  23. Hunter, S. T., "First and ten leadership : A historiometric investigation of the CIP leadership model", Leadership Quarterly, 22, pp.70~91 (2011)
  24. Johnson-Laird, P., "Mental model" (1983), Harvard University Press
  25. Mumford, M. D., "Pathways to outstanding leadership: A comparative analysis of charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders" (2006), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers
  26. Mumford, M. D., "Michael D. Mumford’s Pathways to outstanding leadership: A comparative analysis of charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders", pp.51~80 (2006), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers
  27. Mumford, M. D., "Michael D. Mumford’s Pathways to outstanding leadership: A comparative analysis of charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders", pp.25~50 (2006), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers
  28. Mumford, M. D., "Charismatic and transformational leadership: The road ahead", pp.109~142 (2002), Elsevier
  29. Mumford, M. D., "Quantifying genius: A review of Dean Keith Simonton’s Psychology, Science, and History: An Introduction to Historiometry", Contemporary Psycholgy, 37, pp.216~218 (1992)
  30. Mumford, M. D., "The leadership pragmatism:Reconsidering Franklin in the age of charisma", Leadership Quarterly, 12, pp.279~309 (2001)
  31. Parry, K., "Qualitative and historiometric methods in leadership research: A review of the first 25 years of The Leadership Quarterly", Leadership Quarterly, 25, pp.132~151 (2014)
  32. Popper, K, "The logic of scientific discovery" (1959), Basic Books
  33. Rost, J. C., "Leadership for the twenty-first century" (1993), Praeger Publications
  34. Stogdill, R. M, "Stogdill’s handbook of leadership" (1974), The Free Press
  35. Waldman, D. A., "Leadership and neuroscience: Can we revolutionize the way that inspirational leaders are identified and developed?", Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(1) (2017)
  36. Weber, M., "Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft chapter III", pp.10~ (1947), Originally published in
  37. Winter, D. G., "Leader appeal, leader performance, and the motive profiles of leaders and followers: A study of American Presidents and elections", Journal of Personality anf Social Psychology, 52, pp.196~202 (1987)
  38. Woods, F. A., "Historiometry as an exact science", Science, 33(850), pp.568~574 (1911)
  39. Woods, F. A., "The influence of Monarchs: Steps in a new science of history" (1913), Macmillan
  40. Yammarino, F. J., "Assassination and leadership : Traditional approaches and historiometric methods", Leadership Quarterly, 24, pp.822~841 (2013)
  41. Yukl, G. A., "Leadership in organizations" (2020), Pearson

관련 논문AI추천

류성룡 리더십 - 한국형 리더십의 원조를 찾아서백기복서애학회 · 서애연구2022 · 제5권 진성리더십의 패러다임으로 본 서애 류성룡이민수서애학회 · 서애연구2020 · 제2권 영웅론으로 읽는 류성룡 리더십전상인서애학회 · 서애연구2020 · 제1권 유연의 리더 류성룡서재진서애학회 · 서애연구2020 · 제1권 류성룡의 주역 이해가 리더십에 미친 영향정승안서애학회 · 서애연구2021 · 제4권 류성룡의 유연 리더십의 학문적 토대서재진서애학회 · 서애연구2021 · 제3권

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)

류성룡 주도의 임진왜란 대응전략 –시스템 다이내믹스를 중심으로백권호pp. 5-82류성룡의 유연 리더십의 학문적 토대서재진pp. 137-198서애 류성룡의 경력역량에 대한 탐구 –경력자본가 모델을 중심으로박용호, 권대봉pp. 199-238류성룡의 전략적 인재관리 -인재 등용을 중심으로김동삼pp. 239-307류성룡의 일본 인식이종각pp. 309-370
원문 보기