1910년 병합 「칙유」의 文書上의 결함과 불법성
The defect and illegal characteristic of 1910 Emperor Sunjong’s Imperial Instruction on the Transfer of Sovereign Rights to Japan
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Emperor Sunjong’s(純宗皇帝) Imperial Instruction on the Transfer of Sovereign Rights to Japan(倂合勅諭) which had been promulgated in 1910 August 29th was that Japan fabricates. This Imperial Instruction until 1907 November 9th was equipping the traditional document format namely the format of Great Seal(御璽) and countersignature. But after where November 18th Japan forces a Japanese document format, Koreans Imperial Instruction with Japan and sameness changed in the format of Royal Name(御名), Great Seal and countersignature. But to Imperial Instruction there was only Great Seal, it was different with Japanese Emperor's Imperial Edict(詔勅) which is same character. Korea and Japan promised to announce Imperial Edict simultaneously. Announcing simultaneously was not Imperial Instruction but clearly Imperial Edict. So Resident- General Terauchi Masatake(寺內正毅) August 27th prepared Imperial Edict on the assumption of Emperor Sunjong’s sanction. By the way This Imperial Edict August 29th was exchanged suddenly in Imperial Instruction. The reason is because Emperor Sunjong refuses an sanction. Japan fabricated Imperial Instruction from the objective which will complement the problem point of the Korea-Japan Annexation Treaty(倂合勒約) which lacks a ratification process. So the fabricated Imperial Instruction is historical evidence which Emperor Sunjong opposed a treaty, and to correspond to the ‘national representatives on the force’ which custom international law provide a treaty with invalidity’.
Abstract
Emperor Sunjong’s(純宗皇帝) Imperial Instruction on the Transfer of Sovereign Rights to Japan(倂合勅諭) which had been promulgated in 1910 August 29th was that Japan fabricates. This Imperial Instruction until 1907 November 9th was equipping the traditional document format namely the format of Great Seal(御璽) and countersignature. But after where November 18th Japan forces a Japanese document format, Koreans Imperial Instruction with Japan and sameness changed in the format of Royal Name(御名), Great Seal and countersignature. But to Imperial Instruction there was only Great Seal, it was different with Japanese Emperor's Imperial Edict(詔勅) which is same character. Korea and Japan promised to announce Imperial Edict simultaneously. Announcing simultaneously was not Imperial Instruction but clearly Imperial Edict. So Resident- General Terauchi Masatake(寺內正毅) August 27th prepared Imperial Edict on the assumption of Emperor Sunjong’s sanction. By the way This Imperial Edict August 29th was exchanged suddenly in Imperial Instruction. The reason is because Emperor Sunjong refuses an sanction. Japan fabricated Imperial Instruction from the objective which will complement the problem point of the Korea-Japan Annexation Treaty(倂合勒約) which lacks a ratification process. So the fabricated Imperial Instruction is historical evidence which Emperor Sunjong opposed a treaty, and to correspond to the ‘national representatives on the force’ which custom international law provide a treaty with invalidity’.
참고문헌 (30)
- "覺書(韓國合倂條約 및 兩國皇帝詔勅의 公布에 關한 覺書)(奎 23159)", ~
- "韓日協約(奎23056)", ~
- "倂合ニ關シ寺內統監ヨリ小村外務大臣宛電報應答ノ件, JACAR(アジア歷史資料センタ-) RefA03023679200", ~
- "日韓條約ノ公布日及條約ノ發效日ニ關スル件", 日本外交文書, 43(1), pp.677~
- "詔書, JACAR(アジア歷史資料センタ-) RefA03020824200", ~
- "詔勅條約宣言案, JACAR(アジア歷史資料センタ-) RefA03023679200", ~
- "重要問題와 各大臣, 皇城新聞 1910년 8월 24일", ~ (1910)
- "通告(奎 23162)", ~
- "韓國倂合ニ關スル閣議決定書-其三, JACAR(アジア歷史資料センタ-) RefA03023677700", ~
- "韓國倂合條約ノ調印後速急公ノ必要及條約發效日ニ關スル件", 日本外交文書, 43(1), pp.677~
- "韓國倂合條約案御裁可奏請ノ爲全文電報ノ件", 日本外交文書, 43(1), pp.679~680
- "1910年 韓國强占資料集", ~ (1910)
- "內閣會議案目錄(奎 18033)", ~
- "詔勅(奎 17708)", ~
- "詔勅(奎 17709 v.1)", ~
- "統別詔勅關係往復文(奎 17853 v.1)", ~
- "統別詔勅關係往復文(奎 17853 v.2)", ~
- 小松緣, "韓國倂合之裏面", pp.180~181 (1920), 中外新論社
- 德富猪一郞, "公爵桂太郞傳 坤卷", pp.460~463 (1917), 故桂公爵記念事業會
- 外務省, "倂合ニ關スル韓帝詔勅文通報ノ件", 日本外交文書, 43(1), pp.701~702 (1962), 巖南堂書店
- 外務省, "小村外交史", pp.845~ (1966), 原書房
- 정재정, "한국병합사연구" (2008), 논형
- 운노 후쿠츄, "한국병합의 역사인식, In 한국병합, 성립하지 않았다" (2001), 태학사
- 윤대원, "조작된 「朝鮮總督報告 韓國倂合始末」", 한국문화, (52), pp.253~283 (2010), 규장각한국학연구원
- 李種學, "朝鮮總督報告 韓國倂合始末, In 1910年 韓國强占資料集" (2000), 史芸硏究所
- 이태진, "공포 칙유가 날조된 “일한병합조약”, In 일본의 대한제국 강점 : “보호조약”에서 “병합조약” 까지" (1995), 도서출판 까치
- 이태진, "통감부의 대한제국 寶印 탈취와 순종황제 서명 위조, In 일본의 대한제국 강점: “보호조약”에서 “병합조약”까지" (1995), 까치
- 이태진, "약식 조약으로 어떻게 국권을 이양하는가 : 운노 교수의 비판에 답하며, In 한국병합, 성립하지 않았다" (2001), 태학사
- 이태진, "韓國倂合은 성립하지 않았다, In 한국병합, 성립하지 않았다", pp.58~ (2001), 태학사
- 倉知鐵吉, "小村外交史", pp.840~843 (1966), 原書房
