『삼한시귀감』(三韓詩龜鑑) 소재(所載) 최해(崔瀣)의 평점비평 연구
Study on the pyeongjeom commentary by Choi-hae(崔瀣) included in Samhanshiguigam(三韓詩龜鑑)
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
I explore the pyeongjeom commentary by Choi-hae(崔瀣, 1287~1340) included in Samhanshiguigam(三韓詩龜鑑). Pyeongjeom commentary, which maximizes the dialogical relationship between writter and critic, is a peculiar way of criticism developed in the East Asia. However, studies on pyeongjeom commentary are not sufficient yet, and concentrated on the pyeongjeom commentary of late Choseon period. I intend to fill the void in the field of study of Korean traditional criticism written in classical Chinese. This study begins with examining the morphometric characteristics of the pyeongjeom commentary included in Samhanshiguigam. Next, this study discusses the background of the pyeongjeom commentary included in Samhanshiguigam. Especially, I pay attention to how ‘China=the external’ and ‘Korea=the interal’ are interweaved closely. Based on the two aspects mentioned above, I explore the pyeongjeom commentary by Choi-hae included in Samhanshiguigam. I examine how Choi criticized the poems included in Samhanshiguigam and which poetical tradition he succeeded. Finally I examine a historical meaning of Choi’s criticism included in Samhanshiguigam in a broader context. Samhanshiguigam, which is based on the selection of Korean traditional literature written in classical Chinese Donginjimun(東人之文), is the prototype of pyeongjeom commentary in premodern Korea. Pyeongjeom commentary included in Samhanshiguigam is the case of the initial stage of history of Korean traditional criticism as the appropriation of Chinese literary criticism through transforming it as an important way of organizing domestic literary tradition.
Abstract
I explore the pyeongjeom commentary by Choi-hae(崔瀣, 1287~1340) included in Samhanshiguigam(三韓詩龜鑑). Pyeongjeom commentary, which maximizes the dialogical relationship between writter and critic, is a peculiar way of criticism developed in the East Asia. However, studies on pyeongjeom commentary are not sufficient yet, and concentrated on the pyeongjeom commentary of late Choseon period. I intend to fill the void in the field of study of Korean traditional criticism written in classical Chinese. This study begins with examining the morphometric characteristics of the pyeongjeom commentary included in Samhanshiguigam. Next, this study discusses the background of the pyeongjeom commentary included in Samhanshiguigam. Especially, I pay attention to how ‘China=the external’ and ‘Korea=the interal’ are interweaved closely. Based on the two aspects mentioned above, I explore the pyeongjeom commentary by Choi-hae included in Samhanshiguigam. I examine how Choi criticized the poems included in Samhanshiguigam and which poetical tradition he succeeded. Finally I examine a historical meaning of Choi’s criticism included in Samhanshiguigam in a broader context. Samhanshiguigam, which is based on the selection of Korean traditional literature written in classical Chinese Donginjimun(東人之文), is the prototype of pyeongjeom commentary in premodern Korea. Pyeongjeom commentary included in Samhanshiguigam is the case of the initial stage of history of Korean traditional criticism as the appropriation of Chinese literary criticism through transforming it as an important way of organizing domestic literary tradition.
참고문헌 (39)
- 李義康, "滄江 金澤榮의 散文論과 批評의 實際", 석사, 한문학, pp.1991
- 姜玟求, "英祖代 文學論과 批評에 대한 硏究 : 趙龜命·林象鼎·李天輔·李廷燮을 中心으로", 박사, 한국한문학, pp.1998
- 윤호진, "『水色集』의 頭評에 대하여", 漢文敎育硏究, 19, pp.389~426 (2002), 한국한문교육학회
- 김대중, "『풍석고협집』의 평어 연구", 석사, 국문학, pp.2005
- 박희병, "연암과 선귤당의 대화" (2010), 돌베개
- 강민구, "조선후기 문학비평의 이론" (2010), 보고사
- 김수진, "『乾川藁』評點批評 再論", 고전문학연구, 39(39), pp.268~316 (2011), 한국고전문학회
- 김건곤, "삼한시귀감 연구", 정신문화연구, (겨울), pp.152~159 (1986), 정신문화연구원
- 신승운, "려각본동인지문오칠", ~ (1991)
- 박한남, "최해의 동인지문 편찬과 사료적 가치, In 고려명현 최해 연구", pp.143~154 (2002), 국학자료원
- 조동일, "고려명현 최해 연구" (2002), 국학자료원
- 박한남, "최해의 동인지문 편찬과 사료적 가치"
- 崔瀣, "三韓詩龜鑑", pp.3~ (1980), 이우출판사
- 허균, "국조시산", ~
- 임정기, "국역 목은집 2", pp.153~ (2001), 민족문화추진회
- 孫琴安, "中國評點文學史", pp.55~70 (1999), 上海社會科學院出版社
- 李穡, "牧隱詩藁 卷27", pp.387~
- 李穡, "讀詩行, In 牧隱詩藁 卷22", pp.303~
- 李圭景, "批評詩文點圈辨證說, In 五洲衍文長箋散稿 卷31", pp.888~ (1982), 명문당
- 崔瀣, "東人之文序, In 拙藁千百 卷之二", pp.27~
- 최채기, "(국역) 졸고천백", pp.93~ (2006), 민족문화추진회
- 민족문화추진회, "국역 동국이상국집 1", pp.250~ (1967), 민문고
- 김수영, "새벽에 홀로 깨어", pp.43~ (2008), 돌베개
- 이상현, "고운집", pp.157~ (2009), 한국고전번역원
- 李仁老, "破閑集 卷下, In 고려명현집 2", pp.102~ (1973), 성균관대학교 대동문화연구원
- 고려대학교 한국사연구소 고려시대사연구실, "파한집", pp.370~ (2013), 경인문화사
- 何文煥, "歷代詩話", pp.691~ (1981), 中華書局
- 魏慶之, "進退格", pp.39~ (1992), 世界書局
- 李齊賢, "고려명현집 2", pp.368~ (1973), 성균관대학교 대동문화연구원
- 신호열, "국역 동문선 2", pp.61~ (1998), 솔
- 李奎報, "過延福亭, In 東國李相國集 卷2", pp.304~
- 劉禹錫, "劉禹錫詩集編年箋注", pp.357~ (1997), 山東大學出版社
- 김종진, "최해의 현실인식과 삶의 자세, In 고려명현 최해 연구", pp.63~74 (2002), 국학자료원
- 하정승, "고려 후기 시화집에 나타난 시품 연구", 한문학보, 3, pp.61~83 (2004), 우리한문학회
- 정시열, "高麗時代 風格批評 硏究 <破閑集>과 <補閑集>을 대상으로-", 어문학, (83), pp.453~474 (2004), 한국어문학회
- 李穡, "牧隱詩藁 卷21", pp.284~
- 成俔, "慵齋叢話 卷8", 경산대학교 개교20주년 기념단 학술행사위원회 영인, pp.339~340 (2000)
- 崔恒, "謝原城君贈三韓龜鑑, In 太虛亭詩集 卷1", pp.166~
- 金宗直, "靑丘風雅", pp.177~ (1983), 아세아문화사