민국시기 중국에서의 한국문학 비평 양상 연구
The Characteristics of Korean Literary Criticism Published in China in the Republican Period (1912-1949)
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Based on the journals published from 1912 to 1949, this paper investigates the characteristics of Korean literary criticism published in China during the Republican Period. This study can not only advance the literary communication between China and South Korea, but also provide basic data for the longitudinal study of communication and acceptability of Korean literature in China. The existing scholarship relevant to the theme of this paper is based on modern Korean novels and poetry, merely studying Chinese translation of Korean literature and the acceptability, overlooking Chinese scholars’views and understanding of Korean literature. This is out of the fact that Korean literature, compared with Western and Japanese literature that featured realism, drew less attention from Chinese scholars. However, it was in the Republican Period that Chinese modern literature and academic studies flourished, so Korean literary criticism published then was able to reflect the heights foreign literature studies achievedin that era, and helpful to fully understand the acceptability of Korean literature within Chinese academia. Based on the variations in language for criticism, literary research methods, and textual features, this paper analyzes the characteristics of Korean literary criticism made by Chinese scholars during the Republican Period, demonstrating Chinese scholars’ different understanding, their acceptability of Korean literature and the characteristics of their researches at that time. In short, this study is of practical and referential significance for the present communication and research of Korean literary in China.
Abstract
Based on the journals published from 1912 to 1949, this paper investigates the characteristics of Korean literary criticism published in China during the Republican Period. This study can not only advance the literary communication between China and South Korea, but also provide basic data for the longitudinal study of communication and acceptability of Korean literature in China. The existing scholarship relevant to the theme of this paper is based on modern Korean novels and poetry, merely studying Chinese translation of Korean literature and the acceptability, overlooking Chinese scholars’views and understanding of Korean literature. This is out of the fact that Korean literature, compared with Western and Japanese literature that featured realism, drew less attention from Chinese scholars. However, it was in the Republican Period that Chinese modern literature and academic studies flourished, so Korean literary criticism published then was able to reflect the heights foreign literature studies achievedin that era, and helpful to fully understand the acceptability of Korean literature within Chinese academia. Based on the variations in language for criticism, literary research methods, and textual features, this paper analyzes the characteristics of Korean literary criticism made by Chinese scholars during the Republican Period, demonstrating Chinese scholars’ different understanding, their acceptability of Korean literature and the characteristics of their researches at that time. In short, this study is of practical and referential significance for the present communication and research of Korean literary in China.
참고문헌 (49)
- 範泉, "朝鮮的戱劇運動", 文藝春秋, (4), pp.11~14 (1945)
- 範泉, "論朝鮮作家", 新文學, 1(2), pp.33~34 (1946)
- 伯琦, "朝鮮國詩(上, 中, 三, 四)", 社會日報, ~ (1943)
- 畢立, "朝鮮民族及其神話", 新亞細亞, 4(6), pp.137~138 (1932)
- 復, "新文學發生以後的韓國文學"", 獨立公論, (1), pp.8~14 (1936)
- 何厭, "畧評幾篇朝鮮的新興文字", 萬人雜誌, 2(2), pp.52~56 (1931)
- 昔塵, "朝鮮文化史上之光輝", 東方雜誌, 17(1), pp.36~40 (1920)
- 亨斌, "朝鮮現代文壇的簡略介紹", 現代文藝(上海), (創刊), pp.265~269 (1931)
- 胡風, "『山靈』 朝鮮臺灣短篇小說集" (1936), 文化生活出版社
- 金光洲, "朝鮮文壇的最近狀況", 文藝電影, (4), pp.5~9 (1935)
- 李台雨, "現代朝鮮文學論", 藝文志(新京), (3), pp.340~348 (1940)
- 柳樹人, "朝鮮的民族性", 世說(南京), (4, pp.5) (1948), 1~4
- 梅磊, "朝鮮之文學運動及其的沉寂原因", 亞洲文化, 1(7, pp.8) (1936), 13~17
- 天均, "朝鮮新體詩選序", 中韓文化, 1(1), pp.18~21 (1945)
- 蒲劍, "北朝鮮的人民文藝", 小說(香港), 2(3), pp.97~98 (1949)
- 雪濤, "奮鬪中的朝鮮民族", 南方靑年(南寧), 2(5), pp.4~7 (1933)
- 夏里, "韓國新文藝運動的回顧與前瞻", 中韓文化, 1(2), pp.14~18 (1946)
- 楊昌溪, "朝鮮文學在西洋", 文藝月刊, 5(4), pp.160~161 (1934)
- 楊善同, "書壇: 山靈", 衆生, (6), pp.24~25 (1938)
- 葉菲, "北朝鮮的文學和藝術: 作家․詩人․藝人", 時代雜誌, 8(8), pp.27~29 (1948)
- 王統照, "淸中葉中鮮文藝的交流-吳蘭雪與朝鮮金氏的文墨緣", 文藝復興, pp.345~351 (1949), 中國文學硏究號下
- 漁渭, "東方民族: 朝鮮新詩人", 新亞細亞, 2(2), pp.168~ (1931)
- 文靖珍, "阿里朗", 民族文化, 2(8, pp.9) (1942), 57~59
- 張次篁, "朝鮮大儒金永根之去世", 正風半月刊, 1(10), pp.101~105 (1935)
- 張秀亞, "書評: 山靈", 大衆知識(北平), 1(6), pp.55~57 (1937)
- 朱子容, "朝鮮的神話和傳說", 新學生, 4(3), pp.66~72 (1948)
- 周鋼鳴, "讀過的書: 山靈", 讀書生活, 4(7), pp.36~38 (1936)
- 周作人, "朝鮮民間故事序", 女子月刊, 2(9), pp.2913~2915 (1934)
- "華文大阪每日 1940年 第5卷 第1期", ~ (1940)
- "文藝新聞 1932年 第59期", ~ (1932)
- "中國文學(北京) 1944年 第1卷 第10號", ~ (1944)
- 松本彦次郞, "朝鮮人藝術與宗敎之觀察", 進步, 5(6), pp.46~51 (1914)
- 김장선, "20세기 전반기 중국에서의 장혁주 작품 번역 수용", 한중인문학연구, (51), pp.119~139 (2016), 한중인문학회
- 김장선, "20세기 전반기 중국에서의 한국아동문학 번역 양상", 국제문화연구, 9(2), pp.113~128 (2016), 국제문화연구원
- 김주현, "일제 강점기 한국 근대 소설의 중국 번역 현황과 그 의미", 국어국문학, (181), pp.163~193 (2017), 국어국문학회[DOI]
- 김주현, "근대 계몽기 재중 발간 매체에 실린 한국문학 자료의 조사 및 연구", 어문론총, (75), pp.181~231 (2018), 한국문학언어학회[DOI]
- 한인혜, "일제 강점기 중국에서 번역된 조선 문학－ 중화적 세계문학 개념과 조선 문학의 위치", 비평문학, (64), pp.185~227 (2017), 한국비평문학회
- 郭忠華, "20世紀上半期的“人民”語義與國家建構", 政治學硏究, (6), pp.60~70 (2016)
- 郭忠華, "淸季民初的國民語義與國家想象", 南京大學學報(哲學․人文科學․社會科學版), (6), pp.73~87 (2012)
- 何輝斌, "20世紀外國文學翻譯與評論的歷時的量化硏究", 外國語文, (4), pp.93~98 (2014)
- 金宰旭, "中國現代文學與韓國資料叢書 第1卷", pp.275~293 (2010), 延邊大學出版社
- 金鶴哲, "1949年以前韓國文學漢譯和意識形態因素", 中國比較文學, (4), pp.61~71 (2009)
- 金鶴哲, "建國三十年朝鮮和韓國文學譯介硏究"", 金鶴哲, (1), pp.32~39 (2017)
- 喬艶, "民國期刊外國文學翻譯與編輯策略", 中國出版, (14), pp.70~73 (2014)
- 申先玉, "範泉과 조선근대문학", 중국한국(조선)어교육연구학회 2018년도 국제학술대회 논문집, pp.189~199 (2018)
- 楊克敏, "論民國時期的外國文學硏究", 博士, pp.2014
- 袁荻涌, "民初文壇論外國文學", 靑海社會科學, (3), pp.72~76 (1995)
- 趙莉, "韓國文學翻譯三十年(1976-2006)", 外國文學動態, (5), pp.42~45 (2006)
- 鄭怡鵬, "朝鮮半島詩歌在中國的譯介情況(1930-2016)", 東北亞外語論壇, (4), pp.56~60 (2017)